Art or Craft? What’s the difference?
Do you know anybody who can define the difference between art and craft?
Almost certainly, your answer is “no.” This includes students and everybody else at universities, where there’s always a so-called “Fine Arts” department.
I had a professor who said, “Art is what artists say it is.” Isn’t that nice? So, then, what needs to be defined is the term “artist,” which the prof did not define. Of course.
For me, that was a couple of decades ago. But I’ll bet it’s even worse now, given what I have seen recently in magazines. I don’t watch tv, which always, relentlessly, gets worse.
According to magazines, such as the Smithsonian, Guitar Player, Rolling Stone, and any other big name mag you care to name, art is whatever anybody decides to call art, and it can even be the product of four-legged animals. No kidding. Example: the “painting” by an elephant.
If you are new to this site, please brace yourself for the use of a word that is forbidden for us to use in a manner favorable to our own people.
Definition: Art must serve to improve the artist’s race.
Yes, a race-based definition. Absolutely. Actually, the above definition is just a part of my complete definition. Here’s the rest:
A piece of work rises above craft and becomes art if it successfully achieves or performs the maker’s specific intention(s) toward education and/or inspiring members of his or her race — all in service of the ultimate and necessary goal of improving his or her race.
The successful maker, then, in light of the definition above, already was a craftsperson and now is an artist.
Art is no accident.
A person who cannot clearly define what art is cannot be an artist.
A race-blind nation cannot produce art.
For race-blind craftspeople, art production is impossible.
In other words, if it is art by a White person, it
improves our race, and it does so by
1. educating, or
2. inspiring, or
* Our whole lives, we have had the question “What Is The Meaning Of Life?” put before us and left hanging as if there is no important answer, as if anybody can answer that question with any answer whatsoever.
Improvement is what gives life meaning. By that, I mean improvement in self, family, and race. Thus, the Meaning Of Life is IMPROVEMENT.
* It is important to know who has so diluted the meaning of the term “art” that it has become both meaningless and ubiquitous in use. It is also important to know who has been pushing the question “What Is The Meaning Of Life?” and leaving it hanging our whole lives.
The answer is jews. I don’t capitalize that race term because I show absolutely no respect for that race. I capitalize White. I capitalize Japanese because the Japanese are the only admirable slice of the Mongoloid race (Asian race). I always capitalize White and Japanese, and I capitalize others merely when I feel like it. The knowledge and respect, and lack of respect, come from my extensive experiences living with and teaching members of all of the major races. Doubt it? Ask me, and I’ll tell you.
“No respect for jews?!” That’s right. I respect, in a sense, what they can do against us because of their unity against us, but I do not respect them. And only ignorance disagrees. Readers who disagree with me are also, to varying degrees, in disagreement with Martin Luther, Henry Ford, GLK Smith, Gen. George Patton, Revilo Oliver, Eustace Mullins, George Lincoln Rockwell, William Pierce, and many others. The only reason for most people being ignorant of the jew-awareness of those great men is because the jews ban the truth from being told in all the jew-owned media. And most people have no clue that jews own all the big media, including all the tv networks and big newspapers and magazines down to nearly all little newspapers and magazines. Book publishers, too.
Libraries, too, are controlled by jews across our country. They make sure that Henry Ford’s two books are not in the stacks. Also banned are the books by GLK Smith, Eustace Mullins, George Lincoln Rockwell, William Pierce, and works by other great White authors, professors, investigators, and reporters. The late Eustace Mullins noted that jews stole his books out of libraries. Yep, that’s what they did, and that’s what they still do whenever a book of truth gets donated to a library and somehow gets put on public shelves.
The jews hold their “banned books” events annually just as distractions, to keep people busy with emotional issues that are designed to stay away from the central truth. For example, they like to say that Mark Twain books were banned occasionally because of the use of the term “nigger.”
The controversy over using the term “nigger” uses up all of the participants’ time and attention for subject of “book banning.” They never get to the core truth that the jews are controlling the limits of the discussion on the subject. Furthermore, they never realize that Mark Twain, real name Samuel Langhorne Clemens, was a jew himself. I am the only — the only — White person to ever, as far as I know, unveil Twain/Clemens as a jew. See that historic article, with its mountain of evidence: “Samuel Langhorne Clemens … Was A jew.”
Art. It is the product of human effort that rises above and beyond craft, and it is in service to one’s race.
Therefore, one could argue that some of Samuel Clemens’s work as “Mark Twain” was art — in service of his race, jewry. His craft and/or “art” was against our White race, which was his primary purpose, of course, followed closely by his purpose of enriching himself. He promoted the culture-killing and race-killing behaviors of White youngsters disobeying their parents, of pretending nonWhites are “the same as” us, of accepting the living with — and ultimately the breeding with — Africans and, thus, breeding with any nonWhites. And more.
Most of what the jew publications and broadcasts promote as “art” is obviously against our culture and race, or for the profits of the jews, or both. Did you know Picasso was a jew? That tells you why his jigsaw crap has been promoted by jew publications and deemed so “valuable.” A couple decades ago, that so-called “artist” who put a crucifix into a jar of his urine and called it “Piss Christ” was a jew, of course. (I remember that it was Robert Mapplethorpe, but the jews have rewritten that history already and given the deed to a supposedly “a half Honduran, half Afro-Cuban” named Andres Serrano — yes, a jew.) And currently, look at any of the “controversial” so-called “art,” and you’ll see that jews are there every time. In the rare case that the perpetrator is not a jew, it’ll be a negro or other nonWhite who is being glorified by jew-owned media.
We need WHITE art. White art blossomed in Germany during the great 12-year era that began in 1933 (the year that international jewry declared war on Germany and all German people worldwide). White art can and will help to educate and inspire our nation (not “our country” but “our American part of our White race“) to rise up and conquer jewry once and for all.
I have written about art before, especially in regard to music:
An article about Van Morrison and his one use of the term “White” man
Those articles have links to other articles.
Now, I say to you, my fellow Whites: be doers. We need you now.
Whites Will Win.