George Washington’s Very Flawed ‘Farewell’
This is how most true Americans picture George Washington, and this is one of the quotes used to defend him. But please see below for some revelations. Also, it’s important to remember that every single president has said some pretty words to us, most of which were meant only to deceive.
Historical statements must be considered within the time and conditions in which they were made. When we apply this rule to the USA’s first president under the CONstitution, George Washington, we realize why he said what he said and why he did not say what the first president certainly should have said.
A great example, though it is one just as unbelievable to the ignorant masses as the example of Washington that I am about to expose, is the example of Samuel Langhorne Clemens, a secret jew, better known by his pen name (a false name) Mark Twain, which was not his first fake name. Samuel Clemens, always glorified by the jew media, spoke against education, saying that it was indoctrination in “conformity.”
At the time Samuel Clemens said that, education in the USA was quite good. It was mostly done in local schoolhouses, with multiple classes in a big room, with the neighborhood children being taught what their parents wanted them to be taught, as it should be. They knew our race was the best, as judged by performance, throughout known history.
Samuel Clemens helped to undermine and overthrow that local-controlled education practice in the USA. Today, his 150-year-old anti-education statement sounds good! Of course, it does — after the education system has been completely corrupted in service to the jew agenda, and thus it is an awful experience for most Whites.
This is my final paragraph here about Clemens. Readers may read a large collection of the evidence in my linked article “Samuel Langhorne Clemens, a.k.a. Mark Twain, Was A Jew.” For doubters, I would like to throw in one more, now-obvious, piece of damning evidence. As his most famous and damaging books and characters were anti-family, they were also multi-cult. Especially multi-cult was Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn and its glorified African to whom Clemens gave the White name “Jim.” And the jews force children in schools across the country to read it while, at the same time, the jews falsely whine against Twain’s use of the etymologically correct term “nigger,” as in “Nigger Jim.” In truth, jews hate the Africans — as they hate all non-jews — but they feign fondness for that low-IQ race only to further employ them as tools against our White race.
Again, the typical portrait of George Washington, the main painting used by the U.S. government and Federal Reserve notes. But among major paintings of GW, this is the odd one out.
Now, let us delve into the “Farewell” statement by George Washington. He did not speak it. He only issued it on paper to be published by the government, newspapers, and other outlets around the country. Furthermore, to say that it was “by” Washington is misleading, to say the least. Explanation below.
Endeavoring to be brief, I first present links to various versions and drafts of the “Farewell” as evidence that this analysis was not superficial. Second, I discuss specific points about the “Farewell.”
1. The introduction at the Library Of Congress website (http://www.loc.gov/rr/program/bib/ourdocs/farewell.html) to the “Farewell” admits the following, with a remarkable date for Madison’s first contribution, “1792.” That year was when Washington first wanted to retire from office, or so we’re told.
“Although the ideas expressed were Washington’s, Alexander Hamilton wrote a large part of the address. James Madison drafted an earlier version of the address in 1792.”
2. The following link is to the so-called “first draft” by Washington, which he sent to Alexander Hamilton. Anyone’s simple skim of this document and the final, published version would show that this first draft is very different from the final version.
3. The full version of the “Farewell” at the following link is probably the most authentic and easiest to read, although one must flip through it page by page on the loc.gov site. It offers images of the actual paper pages of a publication of the “Farewell,” with the final page dated Sept. 17, 1796.
4. The following linked version offers images of the actual handwritten pages, which are difficult to read, and one must flip page by page through the images:
5. The presentation at the following link is an easy version to read because it is in simple type all on one page. However, it begins egregiously. Washington’s initial line, “To The People Of The United States,” is not present. Also, Washington’s second line, “Friends And Fellow-Citizens,” is changed to “Friends and Citizens.” Unacceptable. Thus, I chose not to spend any of my time in further reading of that version.
Important note: Of course, jews are lording over all of these linked websites, but the Yale site deserves special disgust for the above reason and because it is directly tied to the jews Sol Goldman and Lillian Goldman.
This authentic publication offers one of the most useful, and rarely seen, portraits of Washington. Below, we will return to further consider this revealing image.
Point 1. In the “Farewell,” Washington referred only once to the “states” as in the separate states of the United States. Exactly, that single reference reads: “the happiness of the people of these States,…” He never referred to the States as the independent, locally-governed groups of people they were supposed to be. Thus, he confirmed his complicity in the CONstitution’s obliteration of “We the United States” for the deceit of “We The People.” (See my historic publication “The CONstitution” for a full exposure of the entire affair.)
Indeed, the “Farewell” begins:
“To The People Of The United States. Friends And Fellow-Citizens:”
Moreover, in a passage discussing the large size of the country, he asked:
“Is there a doubt whether a common government can embrace so large a sphere? … We are authorized to hope that a proper organization of the whole, with the auxiliary agency of governments for the respective subdivisions, will afford a happy issue to the experiment.”
This is another portrait of George Washington anyone can find on valid pro-GW websites. How very different it is from the standard portrait. Note, especially, the nose, but also other features. To those of us who are jew-wise, this man looks to be a jew. (Yes, blurry. But see below for clarity.)
Why did he, or Hamilton, or Madison, write “auxiliary … governments for … subdivisions” instead of “States”? The answer is obvious: He and his jews fully intended to continue the abolishment of state sovereignty (rights and limited independence) that the CONstitution had set well on its way. Yes, “his jews.” Hamilton was a crypto-jew (secret jew), a fact that has long been known. Madison was also a crypto-jew, a fact that I suggested in the “CONstitution” article linked above and that I further support and profess in my forthcoming book, White Honor.
Point 2. Of that CONstitution, Washington wrote that he hoped “the free Constitution, which is the work of your hands, may be sacredly maintained”.
In what way, we must ask, was the CONstitution the work of the hands of any true Americans? It was not. It was the work of the jews. Even the Ten Amendments known as “The Bill Of Rights,” which were demanded by true but compromising Americans, were deliberately written in final form by jews to be confusing and often ambiguous, allowing for erosion in “interpretations” by the jews’ almighty Supreme Court of the “supreme” central government.
“Supreme” is no exaggeration. Washington wrote that the CONstitution was “sacredly obligatory upon all,” and we know that its most infamous clause is openly called “the supremacy clause.”
This portrait of George Washington, also available for anyone to find on pro-GW websites, is quite like the preceding image. Same nose, same crease shape off each nostril. Again, this man looks to be a jew.
Point 3. Also, in utter gall, Washington wrote that if any changes should be thought necessary in the CONstitution, it should be changed only by the exact process(es) as specifically written into the CONstitution. Gall? Yes. He and his co-conspirators had been tasked with exactly such a mission in 1787 in the Convention in Philadelphia, which they made a secret convention, and in which the traitors completely broke their oaths and overthrew the USA’s Articles Of Confederation instead of properly enhancing those Articles.
What Washington and his jews had done in that CONvention in 1787 was the overthrow of the original United States Of America. (Anyone who disagrees has only to read my “CONstitution” article, linked above, to have his or her ignorance evaporated.)
Point 4. In an extension of that gall, he wrote — or merely signed the combined writings of Hamilton and Madison — a long paragraph about credit and debt. This was after he had given control of that system to jewry. Thus, his pretty words were nothing but deceit. In this, he set a precedent that nearly every president thereafter followed, making a complicit pattern of behavior. Immediately below, a famous example will serve as exposition.
Another valid portrait of George Washington, this one from his younger days. This portrait is in agreement with the two jewy images above. Oh, but there is a third jewy image above. Look again, please, at the portrait on the large, aged document above. Why have the jews chosen the softest, the most White-looking, the least jew-looking portrait for mass publication such as on the dollar?
Point 5. The retiring first president warned against having strong ties with any other nations or countries. We have been taught that that was a great and true directive. But at that time, the nation of jewry had no country, thus there was no Israel for jewry to tie us to. Certainly, jewry did not want Americans to have strong ties with fellow White nations in other countries who might have been correctly anti-jew. (Nowadays, with jews at the helm of our countries, jews want strong ties with their Israel and “allies.”)
Meanwhile, Washington and Alexander Hamilton had already bound the USA with the strongest tie to the worldwide nation of jewry: They had given jewry control of the USA’s money system. (A “nation” is a group of people of one race. A “country” is the territory staked out by that nation.) The warning by Washington shares similarity with cryto-jew Dwight David Eisenhower’s so-called warning, as he was leaving office, about the dangers of the “military-industrial complex.”
The military-industrial complex was a complex that Eisenhower willingly had helped to build, and it was a complex owned by his own jewry. Eisenhower told only a half-truth about it, of course. The half-truth was deliberately misleading, thus a lie. Most of us wrongly assumed that Whites were the owners of that complex of traitors. The actual owners were, and are, jews — most of whom pretend to be Whites.
Point 6. Washington, in elaborating on his 1796 “warning,” specifically mentioned Europe, saying that Europe’s primary interests “to us have none, or a very remote relation.” That was blatant division of the White race (known as the “European” race in Europe). England, with a government controlled by jews, was the enemy of true Americans, but the vast majority of people in Europe were distant kin to Americans, not enemies in any way. The backbone of the USA population was, indeed, the productive Germans who had begun settling in North America en masse in the 1600s. And jews tagged along from the very beginning, to be the merchants, lawyers, and bankers, not to do any manual labor but to profiteer off of the inventions and labor of the best race. This has been true of the jews for at least 2,000 years, since their undermining of the Roman Empire.
Point 7. Washington wrote against anyone forming any political party or parties. That sounds like a good idea to us, as we know that the current parties are partners in jew crime. In fact, anyone in power wants no true opposition group. In 1796, jewry held the reins. Their CONstitution was in place, although burdened with the ten Amendments called “The Bill Of Rights.” Washington was either a crypto-jew or complete puppet of jews Hamilton and Madison. Of course, jewry didn’t want any organized opposition. But Thomas Jefferson rose in opposition, and around him formed a party.
Image note: Below, right, is an image showing the text of an ad placed by George Washington pursuing the return of two of his White slaves. It is authentic, as anyone can verify by simple searches, finding such sites as this and this, and more, including government document sites.
As we know, the jews were the owners and operators of the African slave trade. The top owners of slaves in the USA were jews. Washington not only had African slaves, he had White slaves. I ask you: Would any admirable White man have White slaves?
Point 8. Washington wrote, or at least he signed onto what Madison and Hamilton wrote, that it was necessary for people to believe in religion before they could have morals. Of course, our fellow Whites who suffer from such mind-poison as Christianity will see this as evidence in favor of Washington. But such people are also probably ignorant of the fact of many jew Popes, and many jew ministers of every major slice of Christianity. Such people are ignorant of the fact that jewry invented and force-fed the Christian mind-poison on humanity, meanwhile playing both sides, for and against, the toxic nonsense of it, including its suicidal pacifism. Thus, Washington was serving the jew agenda in saying morals cannot exist in us without religion.
My own life stands as proof against Washington’s assertion, as did the life of my father, my mother after 50 years old, Revilo Oliver, the mature Adolf Hitler, and certainly thousands of our White scientists and countless others who shun that mental sickness most openly expressed on Sundays.
There is much more to criticize about Washington’s “Farewell,” but the several points made in this article should suffice to persuade any jew-wise White person that Washington was not the man that schoolbooks and jewsmedia have painted and portrayed.
Already in other articles I have given conclusive evidence about Washington, especially in the historic assemblage, linked above, titled “Why Was The Convention In Philadelphia Secret?” In my forthcoming book, I will offer further evidence — most notably in regard to the jews he kept around him and the jews in the military who he repeatedly saved from court-martial and worse.
But let me now state for the record that my firm conclusion is that George Washington was a jew. The secret of his membership in that anti-human race has been one of jewry’s best-kept secrets of American History. The secret of Samuel Clemens’ jewness was another one. My self-adopted duties as a true White man born in the USA, thus a true American, are to expose jews, kill jews, and urge my fellow White MEN to do the same.
Thanks to my deep study of jews and my particular inherited White talents, my success in exposing crypto-jews, both historical and current, continues to set precedents in aid of my race. Therefore, I recognize it as a duty that I must continue.
Finally, a plea. Please do not let this knowledge of jews infesting the Founding Fathers persuade you to cast out the entirety of the Founding Fathers. The best Founding Fathers — that means the intelligent White Founding Fathers — invented, established, and built the United States Of America into a great country despite the infestation and crimes of jewry. However, as we know, that infestation eventually undermined and overwhelmed Whites’ best efforts, and now we have a huge clean-up job to do.
So be it.
It’s our turn.
In Europe, our ancestors had to fight off the Mongoloid invasion. Later, Germany had to fight off the jew-directed hordes of dupes from the Soviet Union, Britain, and the USA; and although they ultimately lost, the great Germans won enough battles to greatly delay jewry’s progress in Europe and the USA. Here in North America, White Americans had to fight off the jew-controlled Brits, and the jew-influenced Spanish, and then the jew-influenced Mexicans.
But in all of that warring, our Whites never killed a significant number of the real enemy, the root-cause enemy: jewry.
That duty, that privilege, that honor, falls to us.
Contrary to the pacifism and guilt-tripping that the jewsmedia sow, it is actually a joy to kill the correct enemy. Pride is an automatic and instant reward. Ultimate victory will bring the supreme rewards, especially the great White peace, happiness, and prosperity that only the White race can do for us. Only the White race has done it before, even for the other races at times when jewry wasn’t instigating those races into hatred and violence against us.
Kill jews, all jews, now.
Kill jews, Save America, Save Our Race, and Secure Peace for All White Families.
That’s “14 words.”
James T. Laffrey