The title word of this article means, and is meant to mean, that this is a summing-up of this website’s service to my White race, thus far. This subtotal may be followed by more items or this may be followed by nothing more than the final total.

If you find anything on this website valuable to you, copy it now. This website and its contents may not be around a lot longer. When I started this website, back in 2012 or so, I said I would continue it until late 2016, perhaps more. Late 2016 is nearly upon us.

Below, you will find some subtotaling mixed with some new items that I want to get off my chest.

If Worms Owned Hollywood

visual aid

visual aid

I ask you to imagine this one-panel cartoon image. It is mine. An adult mother robin (yes, the bird) is talking to a neighbor robin standing next to her, and to the side we see a young robin sitting in a nest and watching tv.

The mother robin, speaking of her child in the nest, says to the neighbor robin: “Robbie still hasn’t learned to fly yet, and he wants to eat vegetables, get a tattoo, and marry a blackbird!”

In the nest, the young robin is glued to the tv as the wormtube says, “You robins are the villains of Earth!”

Commentary: As we see, if worms owned Hollywood, they certainly would use the power of tv to influence thoughts of watchers. They would tell their enemy, in this case robins, that they were the villains of Earth.

If Arabs owned Hollywood, I mean true Arabs and not the jews pretending to be Arabs that Hollywood presents to tv watchers, the Arabs would rightly use that power to show jews as the prime enemy, and they would say bad things about all other races while presenting their own race as the best. (Of course, the hybrid-race Arabs are not the best, and they probably know that, but they would lie. Lying is an automatic behavior among all nonWhite races. Only the White race has a propensity for truth even when it hurts.)

If Negroes (Congoids, blacks, Africans) owned Hollywood, they would be too stupid to make full use of it. The African race is a low-IQ, violence-prone, dishonest race. Thus, they can’t work together to build nor maintain anything of value.

If Whites owned Hollywood –. We should, of course, in our own White-founded White-built country, we should own everything, especially the companies and institutions that influence public opinion. But we don’t. But if we did, Hollywood would be used to produce honest information and educational entertainment. The extent of the educational aspect would depend on the extent to which our White race in the USA was aware of the enemy of humanity that is jewry. At present, with the awful ignorance and profound gullibility of our race, the imagined White owners of Hollywood would do almost as huge a disservice to our race as the current owners of Hollywood.

If jews owned Hollywood, we would get what we have — subtle and outrageous propaganda against our White race. Lies about history, with all lies going against our White race and in favor of other races, which all works to the benefit of jewry. Promotion of nonWhites, even the stupid Negroes, into positions of authority over Whites. Every kind of insult and lie against Whites. Every problem created by jews and other races gets blamed on Whites. Need I continue to describe every aspect of what jewHollywood is doing against us? Need I even go into detail about tattoos, the bottle-blond jews, the almost total lack of White-looking light-haired men, etc., etc.?

Image source:

Image source:   Folks, those are all jews. That was then. And now? Hollywood is still jewlywood.

Jews own Hollywood. What jews have done with that power is reason enough for us to kill them all. Remember that “awful ignorance and profound gullibility” I mentioned above? Only that disagrees with me.


The headline says “run by” — an understatement, as is the count of jews among the owners of the movie corporations. That’s because the article was written and published by jews knowing Whites would see it. I’ll bet they wish they had not published it.

The Service Of This Website To My White Race

It has to be said, otherwise the ignorant and gullible will not even think it. It has to be said that we have to actually kill the enemy.

As far as I know, only this website, and JB Campbell’s websites, and the CrushZion website say it. We are the top level of true White anti-jew men writing websites. Others are afraid, or still too ignorant — and often those two reasons are one and the same.

Exposing jews. I have gone immensely further than anyone else to expose crypto-jews. From George Washington, James Madison, and other historical figures, up to Samuel Langhorne Clemens (fake name Mark Twain), to current living jews pretending to be Whites as politicians, whistle-blowers, as actors, as doctors and lawyers and musicians and more, even in cities and towns where I have lived (especially in the states of Michigan, California, and Tennessee). Many jews I have named, even an ex-girlfriend, were/are so-called “private” citizens. Also, I have greatly extended our toolkit for identifying jews. Most of the articles on those jews and topics are easily found on this website. (Some of my early articles were on my two previous websites, which were deleted by, and I no longer have any of that archived.)

Food and health. In my first of three websites, I beat everybody to the scientific conclusion that high consumption of grass seeds (especially wheat) is the main cause of the rampant sinus, nose, and throat ailments our White people suffer. (I don’t care about the other races’ suffering.) The chemicals in those seeds damage our mucous-membrane cells, thus allowing bacteria and viruses to infect us. When we’re healthy (not self-poisoning by grass seeds), we shrug off those bacteria and viruses. David Duke mentioned part of this truth. Dr. Mercola’s site was one of my sources of info, the specifics of which I no longer find there. Why don’t other Whites’ websites spread this info, nay, trumpet this info?! Here is my recent repeat of this knowledge.

Coffee. I detailed the effects of coffee on us. Nobody repeated that info, as far as I know. Why? Weakness and ignorance keep even other White webwriters from acknowledging these facts and making the personal sacrifices to improve themselves, let alone to inform other Whites of this important information.

Alcohol. Most White writers even defend alcohol consumption. The crypto-jews pretending to be Whites encourage alcohol consumption and brag about their own abuse of it. On my first of three successive websites, the first two of which are long dead, I detailed the science of alcohol and pronounced it as poison to be used only medicinally. I have repeated the gist of those findings on this site. Yes, I sure do go against the grain, don’t I?!

Now, let me add that these grass-seed poisons can reasonably be used “medicinally,” otherwise rarely. Not daily. Daily is addiction. Daily is self-poisoning, self-decapacitating. In the case of alcohol, it’s slow suicide. If you don’t think so, keep it up. Your limit will come, and your body will tell — by rashes, by hallucinations, by something — that it has had enough, too much. And then you can think about the level of partial-incapacitation at which you have kept yourself for so many years.

My graphics from previous sites are gone, so I got this "Paleo Pyramid" image from a simple web search. It's a  useful image.

My graphics from previous sites are gone, so I got this “Paleo Pyramid” image from a simple web search. It’s very good. See the tiny bit of grains compared to the real food? That’s right.

Food pyramid. I made a very good food pyramid and posted it on a previous website. Along with my info on wheat and other grass seeds, my food pyramid made it clear and obvious what White human food is: fresh meat, fresh vegetables, fresh fruit. Little else. 80 percent of what’s in grocery stores is not food. I have repeated the gist of all of this on this website. How many other supposedly true-White webwriters have repeated this info? None I know of.

When you’re not healthy, the first thing to do is stop self-poisoning!

Vital Book reviews. I have read hundreds of the books on the White book websites and on, and I have reviewed many of them and pointed out their useful facts, their mistakes, and I have exposed many of the impostors who wrote some of them. My selections of the most important of those books are listed and linked on my WhiteSchool page.

Yes, the WhiteSchool page. That’s a service. When I was researching and learning my way up from vast ignorance to this summit, I often grumbled that there ought to already be a well-explained list of the great resources to save us the time of having to read “everything” and spend years sifting, sorting, and comparing to determine who were the authors of truth, the authors of mistakes, and the authors of lies. I put in that time. I made that well-explained list. You’d think that other White website owners would link to it. But except for a couple, they don’t.

Likewise, the TruthfulSites pages.

The title page of the historic publication of the notes of Robert Yates. I believe it was first published in 1821 though this page says 1844, perhaps a later edition.

The title page of the historic publication of the notes of Robert Yates. I believe it was first published in 1821 though this page says 1844, perhaps a later edition.

The CONstitution. JB Campbell inspired me by his mentioning of Patrick Henry’s opposition to the Constitution. I went miles farther. The CON, the treason, the overthrow of the original USA by jewry, stands fully exposed now. Again, other White webwriters, except for a couple, don’t mention it, don’t link to it. Why? It’s over their heads. That’s why.

Current events. On a previous site of mine, I immediately exposed the jews at the head of the sham “Occupy Wall Street” movement. On this site, I repeated the gist of that info. Also on this site, I used to cover selected current events in the hopes of attracting beginners to see the jews behind the curtain. At this time (Oct. 2016) I could show how Donald J. Trump must be a jew, and repeat that Hillary Clinton is a jew. Also, I mixed a lot of beginner-oriented articles into this website. But my website mission is mostly geared to high-level jew-aware Whites for the purpose of inspiring action. News is never enough. News with analysis and exposure of jews is better but still never enough. Everybody should urge action.

Recently, I received an email from a site owner whose site is one of my most highly recommended TruthfulSites, and he said that I was suspected of being an “enemy agent” because of my call for killing the enemy. When I was a step or two below my current level, I had the same suspicion about JB Campbell, so I initiated an email exchange with him and asked him point-blank. He replied persuasively. I improved, and now I don’t doubt his sincerity. We at the top doubt those who seem to refuse to rise to our level.

WhiteHonor.cover.jtl.a.e.miniMy book, WHITE HONOR. I exposed my own past of awful ignorance as I also unveiled a treasure trove of knowledge about American history and our own race’s recent history of falling for the jews’ monstrous lies and letting jews take control of every important institution and industry and ruin our lives. Yet, it’s a “love story.” And it’s a tribute to the great White man named Meriwether Lewis. And dare I say it’s inspirational. I gave it away, and I’m still giving it away. Nobody links to it. How many have even read it? Too few.

Well, this blowing my own horn could go on and on, expounding on Adolf Hitler, 9/11, Revilo Oliver, Gen. George Patton, the worldwide pyramid network, music, my “peers,” and a lot of specifics. But it doesn’t feel right. So, enough.

Other things –.

Our Language Constantly Degraded by jewry

(Update, 18 Oct. 2016: Several items added in this Language section. Also see the comments for more terms recommendations.)

The less we keep distinctions of meaning for our words, the less efficient and the more stupid our language and communications become.

The following misuses of words and phrases can be traced to jew origins. Since the jews spread the misuses so very far and wide by way of their ownership of nearly all “popular” media, Whites pick up the garbage and repeat it. Thus, even you, dear reader, probably say and/or write some of these.

jew-beatles.babydrivemycarBaby. I remember when I was a kid listening to songs on the radio and I realized that the singer was singing “baby” about his girlfriend, not a baby. I didn’t like it. As I grew up, I got better brainwashed, and I accepted it. But now I reject it again. It’s sickening to hear it. Of course, the songs were written and broadcast by jews, and still are. I write songs, and I say “Honey” or “Darling,” appropriate terms for grown-up loved ones. In my book on this website, the main female railed about referring to children as “kids,” which she said meant “baby goats.” I thought her position admirable though a bit much. Is there even a single reader who agrees with me about “baby”? It’s lonely at the top.

old man” and “old lady“. The opposite extreme from the misuse of “baby.” These terms applied to parents and, most absurdly, to spouses, have always grated on my ears. Disgusting, degrading terms. They are not colorful terms of endearment. They are terms of erosion of White self-respect and White family solidarity. Sweep this crap from your vocabulary.

a number of“. When I was getting my second master’s degree, at the University of Hawaii, I sent a department-wide email about this one. We were writing science, in which specificity is vital. Yet, professors, fellow grad students, and most journal articles contained the asinine phrase “a number of”. Example: “A number of languages put the verb at the end of the sentence.” Most often, the writers want the reader to think the “number” is a big one while they dishonestly refrain from telling us the actual number. Other writers are too lazy to make the count so that they can tell us the actual number. Still other writers think it sounds academic or scholarly to say that empty phrase. Now, I find it everywhere from popular science magazines to gun magazines. And now I know that most of those pieces of shit are jews.

Utilize. They say “utilize” when the nice little “use” is better, more appropriate, and right. Much of the description above for “a number of” applies here, too.

That. The jews write and say “that” when they are talking about people! I first thought they were only doing it against nonjews. But no, they are even so stupid as to apply “that” to jews. Here’s what I mean. “Among humanity, Whites are the group that invented science and everything else we value.” It’s a great sentence except for “that.” The “that” in that sentence is wrong. It should say, “… the group who invented science….” The jews often screw up the language in pursuit of their anti-Whites anti-human agenda. But sometimes, such as in this “that” case, they inadvertently put their stupidity on display.

Percentage. The jewsmedia are simply wrong in their usage — or shall I say utilization!? — of “percentage.” Nearly every time, they should be saying “percent” instead of “percentage.” For example, 60% is a percent, not a percentage. That expressed as a percentage is .60 — you see? Huge difference. A percentage is a percent divided by 100. I learned that in about 1970 from my fine White math teacher in Engadine, Michigan. His name was Mr. Nelson, and if I remember correctly, he was Mr. James Nelson.

Sport. An activity of strong physical exertion, often a game, can be called a sport. Not chess. Not golf. Not flying drones. Yeah, I read an aviation magazine a couple of days ago in which the scum jews called standing still while operating a joystick “a sport.” Fly fishing a sport? No. Hunting from a tree stand is a sport? No. That’s not even “hunting”! That’s sitting and shooting. But jews infest it all, and so they exaggerate it all.

Art. Similar to the misuse of “sport” just above, the jews call anything and everything they do or make “an art” or “artwork” or “art.” The proper term for nearly all of it would be “craft,” not art. I have defined “art” elsewhere on this website. If you are interested, do a quick search in the search field near the top of this site. None of what jew Picasso did was art. It seems that every tourism magazine, and Popular Mechanics, and of course advertisements, trumpet the craft of beer-making when done by jews as “art.” Ridiculous, especially so applied to poison-production!

Time. The jews like to say such verbose crap as the following: “I’ve got a nephew who can write a song in only two minutes time.” To give an amount of time and then say the word “time” is asinine redundancy. It’s jew. I remember when I used to think watching tv could be good and that “60 Minutes” was a good show of journalism. Yep, ridiculous. But I was very ignorant. (“Ignorant” means “not knowing, yet”; “stupid” means “incapable of knowing.”) Andy Rooney, the curmudgeon jew on that show, used to use “time” in that stupid way. By the way, in my example sentence above, I started it with “I’ve got.” That’s a Brit-jew stupidity. “I have.” Or “I got.” No need for “I have got,” unless that particular verb tense is the appropriate one. But the Brit-jews use it all the time, and you find it infesting songs in the USA, among other jew emissions.

Badass. This was the adjective of the year for 2015 for jewry in their mass media. The “American Sniper,” what was his name, Chris Kyle?, used it maybe a hundred times in his autobiography, which I think was published back in 2012. And then he was killed. Ha ha. I say he was a jew, by the way. So, that offensive term had a long gestation, from 2012 to recent usage throughout media. The other day, I even saw “badass” in an automobile ad, Japanese or Korean. The jews want to degrade everything in every way so that White children always think their parents are wrong to try to control their own children’s use of words. It’s just one of the MANY ways the jews erode White families into dust.

Like. Is it all across the country or is it only in this craphole in the South where I’m living that “like” is used constantly in speech as a replacement for “said” or “did” or anything like that? I hear parents and children saying, “I was like, ‘Can you be serious?’ And she was like swearing right in the face of her, like, mother.” Actually, it’s hard for me to write it as stupid as they say it. When I was a kid, the jews got young people to say “goes” instead of “says” or some form of “does.” Example: “He got an ‘A’ on the test, and the teacher goes, ‘He’s the only real student in the room!’ And I turned to my friend, and I goes, ‘He’s the only brown-noser in the room!’” Yeah, that’s the way it was.

Gay. This is an old one but nonetheless valid. Young people probably don’t even know that “gay” used to be a form of “happy.” Now, gay is homo, while “homo” has been declared taboo. Isn’t that something? So obvious. The jews of the media decided to put a positive spin on one of their most common perversions: homosexuality. “Homosexuality” was, and is, a perfectly good scientific term for it. Nearly all real Americans knew homosexuality was a disgusting thing we wanted to go away. So, the jews united in replacing it with “gay.” But “gay” was identified with male homos. For a while, they tried to include females in it. I guess the jewess homos wanted their own term, which they already had, “lesbian.” By then, the jews had the gullible public so indoctrinated with “gay” that they didn’t need a new happy term for female homos. They just tacked on “lesbian.” And now, there’s LGBT or some such shit to be inclusive of nearly all forms of the jews’ perversions. They keep trying to tell us by way of all their media that our White race is infested with those perversions, too. But our race is not infested with them. It’s rare. And we will easily wipe it all out after we wipe the scum jews off our land and, eventually, off this planet. That’s the only full solution, by the way.

“Human” said as “yuman”. When I used to watch tv, a portion of the jews said it like that. Example, jew Martin Sheen on “West Wing,” always said “yuman” and “yumanity.” Echhh.

“white” instead of “White.” We see this in print all the time. The jews won’t capitalize “White” when referring to our race. They don’t want us to think of race but only of color.

People of color. On top of, and in contrast with, “white” above, the jews say “people of color” when referring to anybody but Whites. I remember when I was an ignorant intellectual 20-something sponge watching the Donahue show every day, pre-Oprah (which is “Harpo” backward, which is jew). Donahue, surely a crypto-jew despite how White he looks and how Irish he has claimed to be, often said that phrase, “people of color.” At first, it bothered me, but only a little. And then, as the jewsmedia-taught White-guilted zombie that I was, I accepted it. Yeah, it took me way too long to break out of that jew-made bubble in which I existed and to finally say, “Hey, but, but, but, ‘white’ is a color, too! Hmmm. What’s really going on here?

Diversity. According to the jewSA government and jewsmedia, we must have more “diversity,” by which they mean more nonWhites must be mixed into every single group of Whites — even down to the group size of two! They are not calling for more diversity in jew groups, nor Arab groups, nor African groups, nor Asian groups (except for the jews’ efforts in Japan against the admirable Japanese). In other words, in our White-founded White-built countries, “diversity” is a code word for anti-White. It is used as one of the many tools in jewry’s vast toolbox for the killing of our White race. Think about it: Racial diversity would require keeping the races separate, which is how the races developed in the first place. Mixing races is the killing of diversity. If all races mix together, there will be no diversity, only low-IQ mud. That’s what the jews want — all races mixed but their own. The jews keep their core population separate with the full intent of being the ruling race over the Earth’s future population of mud. When they cry “diversity,” they really mean “DIEversity,” that is, “die Whites, die.”

Federal, federalist. Oh, the jews have been at it a long time. As proved in my article (and website page) “CONstitution,” the jews reversed the meaning of “federal” and “federalist.” Even now, the jews of government and media say “the federal government” all the time. It’s not a federal government, it’s a supreme central government. The document called the Constitution even says so. A “federal” government would serve the “federation” of mostly-sovereign states, you see. The jew-instigated so-called “Civil War” proved the lie of federal once and for all. And that war was not a “Civil” war because the South was not trying to take control of the whole. We’re born into these lies and grow up accepting them as if they are the truth and established reality. They are neither!

Nazi. I’ll say it yet again. Adolf Hitler never said nor wrote the term “Nazi.” It was and is an insult term made-up by the jews as a quick nickname that they could demonize. They’re not smart enough and are too lazy to try to demonize National Socialist German Workers Party, so the jews came up with “Nazi” — which was the sound many actual Germans made when they began to speak “National” in the German language.

Adolf Hitler was the opposite of what Hollywood tv, movies, and textbooks "taught" us.

Adolf Hitler was the opposite of what Hollywood tv, movies, and textbooks taught us. You’re looking at an honest, principled, multi-talented White man. Do what I did: Read what he actually wrote and what he actually said rather than letting the jews tell you what he supposedly said. You will agree with me.

Adolf Hitler. Nearly always in the jewsmedia articles I see, the jews only say “Hitler,” without ever giving Mr. Hitler’s first name. Everybody else, upon first mention in an article, gets first name and last name — even serial killers. Mr. Adolf Hitler was the best, most honest, most successful, yet somewhat flawed, leader of our White race in modern history. That’s why the jews insult him — and us — by not giving the simple “journalistic” respect of providing the given name with the family name on first mention.

See the WhiteSchool page for the link to Adolf Hitler’s book Mein Kampf — stalag edition, which is the best. What does “mein kampf” mean? It means “my struggle.” An honest title to an honest book, perhaps the greatest book of all time. Interestingly, he wrote it a few years after Henry Ford published the historic series of jewry-expose articles in his Dearborn Independent newspaper. And then Ford published his series of articles as a book after Mein Kampf was published. Both sides of the Atlantic. Great White men telling the vital, shocking truth.

“We” and “humanity.” I find these terms misused throughout jewsmedia, especially the magazines that I have free access to. Their common crime is to talk about how “we” or “humanity” has invented many things and progressed in certain ways. Actually, WHITES have invented all of those good inventions and Whites promote the only true progress ever proposed and/or made.

Whites invent. Whites work. Jews own.

Whites invent and forget. Asians copy and remember. Negroes use and abuse. (That’s an adaptation of a great statement on the very good Robert Frenz site. The statement is with Item 61 on my TruthfulSites page1.

Our hybrid Southerners

As some readers may know, I grew up in Michigan, and then I lived in Tennessee during a lot of my 20s, 30s, and 40s. And then a combined 12 years in Japan (1), Hawaii (2), and Vietnam. When I finally escaped — and got robbed by — Vietnam, I mistakenly came back to Tennessee. But now I know, thanks to my late arrival to the Reality Of Race, why I always had a problem with most people here. Most of the people called “Whites” are hybrids of Whites mixed with Negro and/or Indian. Evidence: black hair, curly hair, dark-dark brown eyes, malformed bodies. That’s why, compared to the Whites of Michigan, these Southern “Whites” are, in general, stupid. And worse. But since I’m still here, that’s enough said, for now.

But I will say, that I love the Reality Of Race! I look at people and I see the races in them. I see White characteristics, which I love. And I see physical characteristics from other DNA, such as too-wide fingernails, or curly hair of whatever color, or no neck, or legs too short for their overall height, or nonWhite eye color. And many other characteristics, some of which I have provided in my articles on how to identify crypto-jews. I see the nonWhite crap mixed into these supposed Whites. For me, most of them no longer qualify as Whites. And some of them are the enemy scum of humanity, jews.

We real and true Whites are already a minority in this USA. That might get you downhearted. But remember that it’s always a minority making history happen. The White Founding Fathers were a small slice of the total White population here in the pre-USA colonies. Adolf Hitler’s NSDAP (the initials of the name of his political party in German) was a small slice of the great White German population.

Our hybrid Northerners

Can’t speak of the hybrid Southerners as if there aren’t a lot of hybrid Northerners. There are. But I think that generally the Whites of the North are still more White than the Whites of the South. In the North, the damned race-mixing is more likely with the Mongoloids (Indians) than the Congoids (Negroes/blacks/Africans), Congoids being the worst of the pair. The jews are the worst on this planet, and Congoids are second to the jews. the way, the great George Lincoln Rockwell (who earned the adjective “great” only shortly before his death) said that he found Northerners quicker to accept the warning about jewry than about Negroes, and the Southerners quicker to accept the warning about Negroes than about jews. I think it is still true, though likely not as sharp a contrast as it was.

Ha ha. Many readers are asking themselves, “Who is/was Rockwell?” Look on the WhiteSchool page, folks. Read his linked book — either before or after you read Henry Ford’s book The International Jew, also linked on that page.

Which Race They Are

Here at hand is a “WORLD” magazine, issue 30 April 2016, and it has an article about American Indians. Of course, they are wrongly called “Native Americans” in the article, likewise in all jewsmedia. Specifically, the article refers to a female child who is “one-sixty-fourth Choctaw”. Therefore, the article says, a federal law called the Indian Child Welfare Act applied to her and gave “the Oklahoma-based Choctaw Nation enormous influence in determining her placement” with any proposed foster parents or guardians. Yeah, 1/64.

I respond: What about the race that is 63/64 of her?! What if she is sixty-three sixty-fourths White? Why don’t White people then have “enormous influence” over her placement?!

And the answer is: Because White people have been duped, poisoned, and threatened into cowering and allowing everything everything everything against us.

The jew Crime that Killed My Parents’ Business

michigan-mapIn the late 1960s, my parents bravely moved our family from the Detroit metropolitan area to a rural place in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. My dad was the prime mover. He wanted to escape the employment situation he was in, which was frustrating and angering him into ill health. Also, there was probably an element of White Flight involved, too.

We moved into a somewhat rundown motel, restaurant, and gas station combination business that my parents decided to buy. It was seven miles from the nearest little town, Gould City, and thirteen miles from the school we had to bus to, in the little town of Engadine.

We — parents and children — fixed up the place and greatly improved the business. We entirely depended on tourism. In those days, the highway U.S. 2 was all two-lane as it ran, and still runs, westward from the great Mackinac Bridge. In summer, that road was bumper-to-bumper traffic nearly every day with tourists mostly from the Detroit area and other population centers in southern Michigan. Gasoline was cheap, so people drove far and wide — especially families on vacation. Yes, in those days, usually the father had a job that paid a living wage supporting the whole family — including the buying of a house, owning one or two cars, and taking a one-week or two-week vacation every year. What happened to that? Jews happened to that.

Update, 18 Oct. 2016. I came across the info of King Saud bringing his 3-year-old son to the USA for medical treatment in 1957. The ailment: cerebral palsy. Another diseased jew, folks. They are pictured here with jew Dwight David Eisenhower, the president at the time.

Update, 18 Oct. 2016. I came across the info of King Saud bringing his 3-year-old son to the USA for medical treatment in 1957. The ailment: cerebral palsy. Another diseased jew, folks. They are pictured here with jew Dwight David Eisenhower, the president at the time.

In our case, what the jews’ did to kill my family’s business was their deliberate choking-off of the supply of gasoline. The year was 1973. They called it an “energy crisis” that they blamed on “Arabs” of Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries. They used the dire shortage of gasoline as an excuse to skyrocket the price of gasoline. Thus, they still received huge profits even though sales were restricted. I’m not going to go into detail on the supply of oil in U.S. territory nor the supply in other countries. It is enough to know that the supposed Arabs in control of Saudi Arabia were not and are not Arabs but were and are jews. I have published this info before, and I linked to the good source. I included photos and choice details such as the jew family or families the Saudis were directly related to. Sassoons, as I recall, being the main jew family name.

So, tourism into and through the Upper Peninsula of Michigan died. Again, that was 1973. Look it up. Long lines at gas stations. Long lines at gas stations that had signs up saying “Out Of Gas!” There was some recovery in the middle 1970s. But not enough. And the supplier of gasoline to our little gas station was a Shell jobber out of Manistique, Michigan, 25 miles from us. That scum, whether jew or not, charged us more for the gas he delivered to us than he charged for gas he sold at retail in Manistique! Yes, the supposed wholesale price to us was higher than the retail price on his gas pumps 25 miles away. We were robbed. Nothing we isolated Whites in a rural place could do about it. Actually, we should have killed the fucker. Wisely, covertly, and easily — with a rifle in that rural setting with no witnesses (not near our own business, of course) — we should have killed that killer of our family business.

I can still picture the cars pulling into our place, and the drivers looking at the price on our pumps, and then their tires spinning and throwing gravel as they furiously drove out of our driveway and back onto U.S. 2. They all drove from city to city, not buying gas nor anything else in the rural areas between. As I said, there was some recovery but not much. And then, they did another gas crisis! Yep. As I recall, it was 1978.

My parents, nearly penniless, decided there was no choice but to abandon the business. I was in southern Michigan at the time of their decision. They invited me to accompany them and my younger brother to the chosen location: Crossville, Tennessee, because of an extended family connection. We had moved to the Upper Peninsula as a family of seven (my oldest brother already had been drafted into the Army). We moved to Tennessee as a family of four. The ordeal had taken quite a toll on our family. The jews won again.

You see, I don’t have the short attention span that most dumbed-down Whites have. I remember. I spend time thinking about the important events of the past. I connect them to what I have learned, to what is going on, and then I write about some of the gained knowledge and wisdom for the benefit of my website readers. This I have done for several years.

The spark that caused me to write here about this piece of history was an article and chart in the magazine Science, dated 26 August 2016, Volume 353 Issue 6302. The chart, on page 860, shows a petroleum timeline from the years 1890 to 2013. At or near the year 1970 on the chart, there is this statement: “Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries imposes oil embargo on United States.” And then right next to and after that point on the chart, there is one that says “Soviet gas production is privatized as Gazprom.”

I’m telling you, jews controlled Saudi Arabia, and OPEC, and jews controlled the Soviet Union. “Privatization” meant, and still means, the government “selling” a government function or government “business” to jews. President Ronald Reagan was the king of privatization here in the USA.

Can you see that jews created the embargo, the gas “crisis,” for their benefit, partly for windfall profits, partly to squeeze more Whites out of business, partly for whatever. Can you see?

This one episode in history is reason enough for me, personally, to kill jews. But neither I, nor you, need any personal reasons. Yes, we have them, and they are many. But the jews’ crimes against our entire race are monstrous, obvious, and ongoing. They are reason for all of us to kill all of the jews. And kill them we must — in order for our White race to survive and make a future not only as good as parts of the past but better. Only our White race can do that.

Also, I have weighed solution ideas. There is only one that each and every one of us can do that is absolutely 100 percent effective.

Free Will

To Christians I say, Your God Is AWOL. (Maybe I should copyright that statement. It’s great, isn’t it? “God Is AWOL” and “Your God Is AWOL.” Perfect for bumperstickers, or write it with dry-erase marker on your car’s back window.) Yes, Christians, AWOL. Is that not painfully obvious for you? The wars! Your god doesn’t stop any wars, doesn’t prevent new ones. Car accidents occur every day that kill even your fellow Christians. Every day. Christians pray pray pray and yet all the carnage continues. Tornadoes and hurricanes kill and kill and kill. The jews’ insurance companies call those “acts of God” or “acts of nature.” Since your God knows the future, your God lets it all happen. It can also be said that since your God made everything and knew what everything would do, he actually makes it all happen.

Once in a while, in the right situation, when some numbskull Christian tells me “thank God” for his or her illness going away, or getting a new wage-slave job, or whatever, I respond:

“Now I know why God doesn’t stop the wars and murders and car accidents. You keep him too busy with all your little issues!”

As for Free Will, there is no such thing. Christians are supposed to believe that their God knows the past, present, and future. All of it. Therefore, when he creates something, such as people, he knows exactly what every bit of their future is going to be. It’s all “God’s Plan,” say the Baptist preachers around here in Crossville. I’ve heard many of them, in person. I know of what I speak. So, there’s no Free Will. You can’t choose anything that is not already in God’s Plan. You can not choose to do something that God already knows you are not going to do. You must choose to do everything that God already knows you are going to do. He knows the future, remember? Thus, there is no Free Will.

The jew Bible. We know that jews wrote the stories that got put together to form the Bible. And jews rewrote and rearranged the Bible into what it is now. The jews wrote the Bible and wrote that they, themselves, were the “Chosen People.” How about that? Is that meek? Is that Christian-like? Ha ha. Of course not. It’s jew.

Why believe that crap? Why believe an absurd bunch of nonsense stories about impossibilities IN THE DESERT of the MIDDLE EAST? Our White race is from great green forests and grasslands! We sailed and seeded the world with our great stone structures — pyramids and Stonehenge and sea ports (such as what’s underwater at Bimini) thousands of years BEFORE the jews began writing their tales — tales that are NOT in any historical writings by historians, by the way. The tales in the Bible are not “history.”

They get you when you’re a kid, when you know nothing. And then you grow up with it as a part of you — a poisonous part of you. Then, you’re a parent and you pass it to your kids from their innocent ignorant births. Now, as an adult, if you just start reading the Bible armed with your actual knowledge, you will scoff at every page and quickly and correctly decide to deposit that mere book in the trash. Right off the top, read about the creation. The jews were “divinely inspired,” so they must not have been WRONG, eh? — wrote about the Earth, Moon, and stars being created. Hey, what about the PLANETS? Those scum jews almost 2,000 years didn’t know that some of the “stars” are actually planets. Divinely inspired ignorance? Or crap? It’s crap!

Here’s a good line by me that I have carried with me for decades: I would be a better god than God! And so would you.

We wouldn’t create a whole population, knowing what every one of them was going to do in their lives, and then blame them for what they do and DROWN THEM ALL except for one family in a WORLDWIDE FLOOD.

Oh, it’s all so utterly ridiculous. I know that this Waking Up is traumatic. It turns your world upside-down. I know. My world was overturned when I came to realize that I had wrongly felt White guilt, and believed “everybody’s equal,” and all that jew crap for my entire life. I went through the disbelief, then the anger and acceptance and disgust and regrets and acceptance and ….

At most, One Sect is correct. Think of all the Christian groups, divisions, sects. Every one of them claims they are “divinely inspired” to believe what they believe and not quite what any other Christian faction believes. They ALL disagree. Therefore, only ONE at most can be right! All are wrong, or all but one are wrong!

Why do I say all this about religion yet again? Because it is a major roadblock. Most Christians can’t open their eyes to the reality of jews and the reality of race while they are still suffering under the poison ideas of their religion. Remember, religion is by definition a set of “beliefs.” “Believing” is thinking that something is true when there is no verifiably factual basis for thinking it true. Why not base your life on what is factual and verifiably true? Base your life on our White Knowledge Foundation instead of on the jew-written foundation of poisonous beliefs?

Identity Theft by jews Against Us

The following is more of what I have reported before. Very recently, I started an email account with and posted that email address on this site. Already, jews have used that email address OF MINE to subscribe to publications by the jew and the jew SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center, a branch of the jew B’nai B’rith worldwide anti-humanity organization). I have received the “confirmation” or “thank you” emails from those anti-White organizations. Now, if somebody wants to say that may have occurred either by individual jew action or automatic webbot action, I say IT DOESN’T MATTER which it is. It is united jew action against us true, anti-jew, WHITE men and women.

Surely, it happens against others, though I have yet to read it reported on any other White website.

Three Personal Events of Very Recent History

First, I recently met a White man whose close relative was/is actively anti-White but foolishly so. This meeting occurred completely by chance. In a coffeeshop at, for me, was a strange time for me to drop in there. He spoke to me first, offering a completely casual statement as he sat down in my vicinity. After a few minutes, I offered a fact and a question — related to the recent anniversary of 9/11. And he replied with a good answer! We went on to speak rather openly about the enemy jews.

At my invitation, we met again. It was a very satisfying event, thanks to speaking almost totally openly about race, jews, and the solution.

And then he sent a text message to me saying he had seen my website and it was too much for him. No communication has been initiated by him since then, as far I can possibly know. He has declined my invitations, and I have given up. Of course, I am not identifying him with any specificity because he deserves his anonymity because he is a fellow White person and he still has the capacity to learn his way up to this level.

Second, I thought I had a friend here who is White and could learn to accept the knowledge I offered in bits and pieces, this despite his Christinsanity. He didn’t want to learn anything, though, as I now fully realize. Ignorance is most adamant among the C-insane. But his most recent act was to take on a Mexiturd “lady friend.” That is anti-White. Unacceptable. I told him so. He replied, by text, that he would “pray” for me. I did not flame him in return, such as saying he might pray first (and also completely uselessly) to end wars or rapes or child abuse, nor did I reply at all. Let it go. He seems White, though with a taint of other, and so I give him space and retain hope.

Another thing he said in that text deserves comment. I had texted that he has rejected the knowledge, “knowledge” I said, that I have been offering. In his reply, he said he has always accepted that we have had different “ideas.” He also has said, “Everybody has an opinion,” which is a way to dismiss anything and everything uncomfortable. He has learned well, hasn’t he, from tv and other jewsmedia? Every adult White person should figure out the following — without having to be told:

  1. Opinions and ideas are not necessarily reality.
  2. Facts are reality. Assembled facts become knowledge.
  3. Knowledge is reality.
  4. Only from facts and knowledge can we achieve wisdom.

Third, I reunited with an old friend from decades ago. This friend is married. We three had a meal together. It was great to see the spouse looking quite White, and both of them spoke well about guns and against “socialism” and “communism” and related issues. One good example, the usefulness of killing. Christinsanity was there, though. I left it uncritiqued. And because of that, I didn’t mention jews. Oh, yes, I know, their raising of socialism and communism was an open door to pointing out the jew link — jews invented both of those mind-poisons/anti-White systems. I thought it best to save that for a second meeting :-) . And I still think so.

I finished with that third and most recent event in order to finish on a positive note. We do best by maintaining positivity — before, during, and after we recognize the negative. Positivity inspires.

To drop another great White name, Revilo Oliver — yeah, I mentioned him above and said I would not expound upon his name. But he perfectly illustrates the following point. His great body of work for the Liberty Bell magazine and his own books would have had greater positive effect if he had not so often concluded those works with his negative assessment of the situation and our prospects, as he saw them. While reading his works over the course of a couple of years, I became aware of that mental effect, and I had to steel myself against the negativity in order to carry on and get the full benefit of the knowledge he offered. A treasure of knowledge. was Revilo Oliver? Again, see the WhiteSchool page, please. Liberty Bell magazine, our greatest treasure of first-draft history 1970s – 1990s? Again, the WhiteSchool page.


So, I said upon the launch of this website that I promised to continue this site until at least November 2016. And I have, into October thus far. And I will continue at least another month. Unless, of course, the jews get the site deleted from my very admirable host-server.

Will I continue the site, and continue writing new articles at least occasionally after November 2016? I don’t know, but I doubt it. My time could be better spent elsewhere. And I’ll tell ya, the lack of donations to help with one of my efforts elsewhere – song production – is a factor in this.

Here on this website, there certainly is plenty of knowledge and wisdom to wake up any White person with a functioning brain and to bring him, her, maybe you, up onto this supreme plateau of pro-White anti-jew awareness. At this point, we have the necessary knowledge. Knowledge brings duty. It’s automatic among us true Whites. And wisdom helps us do our duty. As always, I say that for now we do our duty covertly, efficiently, as safely as possibly, telling no one. Upon our White Victory, we silent heroes will enjoy the glory, not until.

Meanwhile, copy what you like on this site. I have used the following site to make pdf files of web pages, free (and there are others):

If you think the pdf or paper publication of any of this website would make a profit for you and me, then let me know what your plan is (by email, or by comment if the comment section is still open).

Finally, see the best advice for budding White heroes linked at the bottom of this website.


‘Nation and Race’

‘Nation and Race’

The title of this article is the title of a chapter in one of the greatest books of all time, perhaps the greatest.

The author — whose name I will give at the bottom of this article — and the superb content of the “Nation and Race” chapter of his book, give me plenty of reason to abandon my string of one-word titles of articles (have you noticed?) Hint: This chapter is from the recently available “Stalag edition” of the great book, clearly the best English version of all (though it is British English).

Without further ado, I now present the entire chapter below. Note: I have corrected the typos that were introduced into the copy almost certainly by the OCR (optical character recognition) software used to convert the paper pages to a pdf file. I retained the page numbers, and I retained British-English word usages and spellings though I did eliminate some of the many superfluous uses of the word “which.”

________ ________

Nation and Race


There are certain truths which are so obvious that the general run of people disregard them. People are so blind to some of the simplest facts in everyday life that they are highly surprised when somebody calls attention to what everybody ought to know.

Examples of the Columbus egg are around us in hundreds of thousands, but Columbuses are rare.

Walking about in the garden of Nature, most men have the self-conceit to think that they know everything, yet almost all are blind to one of the outstanding principles that Nature employs in her work.

This principle may be called the inner isolation which characterises each and every living species on this earth.

Even a superficial glance is sufficient to show that all the innumerable forms in which the life-urge of Nature manifests itself are subject to a fundamental law—one may call it an iron law of Nature—which compels the various species to keep within the definite limits of their own life-forms when propagating and multiplying their kind.

Each animal mates only with one of its own species. The titmouse cohabits only with the titmouse, the finch with the finch, the stork with the stork, the field-mouse with the field-mouse, the house-mouse with the house-mouse, the wolf with the she-wolf, etc.

Deviations from this law take place only in exceptional circumstances. This happens especially under the compulsion of captivity, or when some other obstacle makes procreative intercourse impossible between individuals of the same species.

Nature abhors such irregular intercourse with all her might, and her protest is most clearly demonstrated by the fact that the hybrid is either sterile or the fecundity of its descendants is limited.

In most cases hybrids and their progeny are denied the ordinary powers of resistance to disease or the natural means of defence against attack.

Such a dispensation of Nature is quite logical. Every crossing of two


breeds which are not of equal standing results in a product which holds an intermediate place between the levels of the two parents.

This means that the offspring will indeed be superior to that parent which belongs to a biologically lower order of beings, but not so high as the superior parent.

For this reason, it must eventually succumb in any struggle against the higher species. Such mating contradicts the will of Nature toward the selective improvement of life in general.

The favourable preliminary to this improvement is not to mate individuals of higher and lower orders of being, but rather to allow the complete triumph of the higher order.

The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature.

Only the born weakling can look upon this principle as cruel, and if he does so, it is merely because he is of a feebler nature and narrower mind, for if such a law did not direct the process of evolution then the higher development of organic life would not be conceivable at all.

This urge for the maintenance of the unmixed breed which is a phenomenon that prevails throughout the whole of the natural world, results not only in the sharply defined outward distinction between one species and another but also in the internal similarity of characteristic qualities which are peculiar to each breed or species.

The fox remains always a fox, the goose remains a goose, and the tiger will retain the character of a tiger. The only difference that can exist within the species is in the various degrees of structural strength and active power, in the intelligence, efficiency, endurance, etc., with which the individual specimens are endowed.

It would be impossible to find a fox which has a kindly and protective disposition toward geese, just as no cat exists which has a friendly disposition toward mice.

That is why the struggle between the various species does not arise from a feeling of mutual antipathy, but rather from hunger and love.


In both cases Nature looks on calmly and is even pleased with what happens. The struggle for daily livelihood leaves behind in the ruck everything that is weak, diseased, or wavering; while the fight of the male to possess the female gives to the strongest the right, or at least the possibility, to propagate its kind.

This struggle is a means of furthering the health and powers of resistance of the species, thus it is one of the causes underlying the process of development toward a higher grade of being. If this were otherwise, the progressive process would cease, and even retrogression might set in.

Since the inferior always outnumber the superior, the inferior would always increase more rapidly if they possessed the same capacity for survival and for the procreation of their kind, and the final consequence would be that the best in quality would be forced to recede into the background.

Therefore, a corrective measure must intervene in favour of the better quality. Nature supplies this by establishing rigorous conditions of life, to which the weaker will have to submit and will thereby be numerically restricted, but even that portion which survives cannot multiply indiscriminately, for here a new and rigorous selection takes place, according to strength and health.

If Nature does not wish that weaker individuals should mate with stronger, she wishes even less that a superior race should intermingle with an inferior one, because in such a case all her efforts, throughout hundreds of thousands of years, to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being, may be rendered futile.

History furnishes us with innumerable instances that prove this law. It shows, with startling clarity, that whenever Aryans have mingled their blood with that of an inferior race, the result has been the downfall of the people who were the champions of a higher culture.

In North America, where the population is prevalently Teutonic, and where those elements intermingled with the inferior race only to a very small degree, we have a quality of mankind and a civilisation which are different from those of Central and South America.

In these latter countries, the immigrants—who belonged mainly to the Latin races—mated with the aborigines, sometimes to a very large extent



In this case, we have a clear and decisive example of the effect produced by the mixture of races.

In North America the Teutonic element, which has kept its racial stock pure and did not mix it with any other racial stock, has come to dominate the American Continent and will remain master of it as long as that element does not fall a victim to the habit of adulterating its blood.

In short, the results of miscegenation are always the following:

(a) The level of the superior race becomes lowered.

(b) Physical and mental degeneration sets in, thus leading slowly but steadily toward a progressive drying up of the vital sap.

The act which brings about such a development is a sin against the will of the Eternal Creator, and as a sin this act will be avenged.

Man’s effort to build up something that contradicts the iron logic of Nature brings him into conflict with those principles to which he, himself, exclusively owes his own existence.

By acting against the laws of Nature, he prepares the way that leads to his ruin.

Here we meet with the insolent objection, which is Jewish in its inspiration and is typical of the modem pacifist, that “Man can overcome Nature.”

There are millions who repeat by rote that piece of Jewish babble and end up by imagining that somehow they themselves are the conquerors of Nature.

Yet their only weapon is a mere idea, and a very preposterous idea into the bargain, because if one accepted it, then it would be impossible to form a conception of the world.

The real truth is that not only has man failed to overcome Nature in any sphere whatsoever but that at best he has merely succeeded in getting hold of and lifting a tiny corner of the enormous veil which she has spread over her eternal mysteries and secrets.


He never invents anything; all he can do is to discover something. He does not master Nature but has only come to be master of those living beings who have not gained the knowledge he has arrived at by penetrating into some of Nature’s laws and mysteries.

Apart from all this, an idea can never subject to its own sway those conditions which are necessary for the existence and development of mankind, for the idea itself has come only from man.

Without man there would be no human idea in this world. The idea as such is, therefore, always dependent on the existence of man and is consequently dependent on those laws which furnish the conditions of his existence.

Not only that. Certain ideas are even confined to certain people. This holds true with regard to those ideas, in particular, which have not their roots in objective scientific truth but in the world of feeling.

In other words, to use a phrase which is current to-day and which well and clearly expresses this truth: They reflect an inner experience.

All such ideas, which have nothing to do with cold logic as such, but represent mere manifestations of feeling, such as ethical and moral conceptions, etc., are inextricably bound up with man’s existence.

It is to the creative powers of man’s imagination that such ideas owe their existence.

For this very reason, a necessary condition for the preservation of such ideas is the existence of certain races and certain types of men.

For example, anyone who sincerely wishes the pacifist idea to prevail in this world ought to do all he is capable of doing to help the Germans conquer the world, for in case the reverse should happen, it may easily be that the last pacifist would disappear with the last German.

I say this because, unfortunately, scarcely any other people in the world has ever fallen a prey to this nonsensical and illogical idea to the same degree as our own.

Then, if you are serious, whether you like it or not, you must make up your mind to wage wars in order to pave the way for pacifism. This was in fact


the plan of Woodrow Wilson, the American world-redeemer (at least so our visionaries believed), and that was all that was required.

The pacifist-humanitarian idea may indeed become an excellent one when the most superior type of manhood will have succeeded in subjugating the world to such an extent that this type is then sole master of the earth. This idea could have an injurious effect only in the measure in which its application became difficult and finally impossible.

So, first of all, the fight, and then pacifism. If it were otherwise, it would mean that mankind has already passed the zenith of its development, and accordingly, the end would not be the supremacy of some moral ideal, but degeneration into barbarism and consequent chaos.

People may laugh at this statement, but our planet moved through space for millions of years, uninhabited by men, and at some future date may easily begin to do so again, if men should forget that wherever they have reached a superior level of existence, it was not as a result of following the ideas of crazy visionaries but by acknowledging and rigorously observing the iron laws of Nature.

What reduces one race to starvation stimulates another to harder work. All the great civilisations of the past became decadent because the originally creative race died out, as a result of contamination of the blood.

The most profound cause of such a decline is to be found in the fact that the people ignored the principle that all culture depends on men, and not the reverse.

In other words, in order to preserve a certain culture, the type of manhood that creates such a culture must be preserved, but such a preservation goes hand in hand with the inexorable law that it is the strongest and the best who must triumph and that they have the right to endure.

He who would live must fight. He who does not wish to fight in this world, where permanent struggle is the law of life, has not the right to exist.

Such a saying may sound hard, but, after all, that is how the matter really stands. Yet far harder is the lot of him who believes that he can overcome Nature, and thus in reality insults her. Distress, misery, and disease are her rejoinders.


Whoever ignores or despises the laws of race really deprives himself of the happiness to which he believes he can attain, for he places an obstacle in the victorious path of the superior race and, by so doing, he interferes with a prerequisite condition of all human progress.

Loaded with the burden of human sentiment, he falls back to the level of a helpless animal.

It would be futile to attempt to discuss the question as to what race or races were the original champions of human culture and were thereby the real founders of all that we understand by the word ‘humanity.’

It is much simpler to deal with this question in so far as it relates to the present time. Here the answer is simple and clear.

Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. All that we admire in the world to-day, its science and its art, its technical developments and discoveries, are the products of the creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their first beginnings must be attributed to one race.

The existence of civilisation is wholly dependent on such peoples. Should they perish, all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the grave.

However great, for example, be the influence which the soil exerts on men, this influence will always vary according to the race on which it produces its effect. Dearth of soil may stimulate one race to the most strenuous efforts and highest achievements; while, for another race, the poverty of the soil may be the cause of misery and finally of undernourishment with all its consequence.

This very fact fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded a superior type of humanity; therefore he represents the archetype of what we understand by the term: MAN.

He is the Prometheus of mankind, from whose shining brow the divine spark of genius has at all times flashed forth, always kindling anew that fire which, in the form of knowledge, illuminated the dark night by drawing aside the veil of mystery and thus showing man how to rise and become master over all the other beings on the earth.


Should he be forced to disappear, a profound darkness will descend on the earth; within a few thousand years human culture will vanish and the world will become a desert.

If we divide mankind into three categories—founders of culture, champions of culture, and destroyers of culture—the Aryan alone can be considered as representing the first category.

It was he who laid the groundwork and erected the walls of every great structure in human culture. Only the shape and colour of such structures are to be attributed to the individual characteristics of the various nations.

It is the Aryan who has furnished the great building-stones and plans for the edifices of all human progress; only the way in which these plans have been executed is to be attributed to the traits of each individual race.

Within a few decades the whole of Eastern Asia, for instance, appropriated a culture and called this culture its own, whereas the basis of that culture was the Greek mind and Teutonic technical skill as we know it.

Only the external form—at least to a certain degree—shows the traits of an Asiatic inspiration.

It is not true, as some believe, that Japan adds European technology to a culture of her own. The truth rather is that European science and technology are just decked out with the peculiar characteristics of Japanese civilisation. The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the native Japanese culture, although this characterises the external features of the country, features that strike the eye of European observers on account of their fundamental difference from our own; but the real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America, that is to say, of Aryan peoples.

Only by adopting these achievements as the foundations of their own progress can the various nations of the Orient take a place in contemporary world progress.

The scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America provide the basis on which the struggle for daily livelihood is carried on in the Orient.

They provide the necessary arms and instruments for this struggle, and


only the outer forms of these instruments have become gradually adapted to Japanese ways of life.

If, from to-day onward, the Aryan influence on Japan were to cease, and if we suppose that Europe and America were to collapse, then the present progress of Japan in science and technique might still last for a short duration; but within a few decades the inspiration would dry up, and native Japanese character would triumph, while the present civilisation would become fossilised and fall back into the sleep from which it was aroused about seventy years ago, by the impact of Aryan culture.

We may, therefore, draw the conclusion that, just as the present Japanese development has been due to Aryan influence, so in the immemorial past an outside influence and an outside culture brought into existence the Japanese culture of that day.

This opinion is very strongly supported by the fact that the ancient civilisation of Japan actually became fossilised and petrified.

Such a process can take place only if a people loses the racial cell which had originally been creative, or if the outside influence should be withdrawn after having awakened and maintained the first cultural developments in that region.

If it be shown that a people owes the fundamental elements of its culture to foreign races, assimilating and elaborating such elements, and if subsequently that culture becomes fossilised whenever the external influence ceases, then such a race may be called the champion, but never the creator, of a culture.

If we subject the different peoples to a strict test from this standpoint, we shall find that scarcely any one of them has originally created a culture, but almost all have been merely the recipients of a culture created elsewhere.

This development may be depicted as always happening somewhat in the following way. Aryan tribes, often almost ridiculously small in number, subjugated foreign peoples and, stimulated by the conditions of life which their new country offered them (fertility, the nature of the climate, etc.), and profiting also by the abundance of manual labour furnished them by the inferior race, they developed intellectual and organising faculties which had hitherto been dormant in themselves.


Within the course of a few thousand years, or even centuries, they gave life to cultures whose characteristics completely corresponded to the character of the founders, though modified by adaptation to the peculiarities of the soil and the characteristics of the subjugated people.

But finally the conquering race offended against the principles which they had first observed, namely, the preservation of their racial stock unmixed, and began to intermingle with the subjugated people.

Thus they put an end to their own separate existence, for the original sin committed in Paradise has always been followed by the expulsion of the guilty parties.

After a thousand years or more the last visible traces of those former masters may then be found in a lighter tint of the skin which the Aryan blood had bequeathed to the subjugated race, and in a fossilised culture of which those Aryans had been the original creators; for, just as the blood of the conqueror, who was a conqueror not only in body but also in spirit, became submerged in the blood of the subject race, so the substance disappeared from which the torch of human culture and progress was kindled.

In so far as the blood of the former ruling race has left a light nuance of colour in the blood of its descendants, as a token and a memory, the night of cultural life is rendered less dim and dark by a mild light radiated from the products of those who were the bearers of the original fire.

Their radiance shines across the barbarism to which the subjected race has reverted and might often lead the superficial observer to believe that he sees before him an image of the present race when he is really looking into a mirror, wherein only the past is reflected.

It may happen that in the course of their history such a people will come into contact a second time, and even oftener, with the original founders of their culture and may not even remember that distant association.

Instinctively, the remnants of blood, left from that old ruling race will be drawn toward this new phenomenon, and what had formerly been possible only under compulsion can now be successfully achieved in a voluntary way. A new cultural wave flows in and lasts until the blood of those who brought it becomes once again adulterated by intermixture with the originally conquered race.


It will be the task of those who set themselves to write a universal history of civilisation to investigate history from this point of view instead of allowing themselves to be smothered under the mass of external data, as is only too often the case with our present historical science.

This short sketch of the changes that take place among those races that are only the depositories of a culture also furnishes a picture of the development, the activity, and the disappearance of those who are the true founders of culture on this earth, namely the Aryans themselves.

Just as in our daily life the so-called man of genius needs a particular occasion, and sometimes needs a special stimulus to bring his genius to light, so too, in the life of the peoples the race that has genius in it needs the occasion and stimulus to give that genius expression.

In the monotony and routine of everyday life, even persons of significance seem just like the others and do not rise beyond the average level of their fellow-men, but as soon as such men find themselves in a special situation which disconcerts and unbalances the others, the humble person of apparently common qualities reveals traits of genius often to the amazement of those who have hitherto known him in the petty round of everyday life.

That is the reason why a prophet is seldom honoured in his own country.

War offers an excellent occasion for observing this phenomenon. In times of distress, when the others despair, apparently harmless boys suddenly spring up and become heroes, full of determination, undaunted in the presence of Death and manifesting wonderful powers of calm reflection in such circumstances.

If such an hour of trial did not come, nobody would have thought that the soul of a hero lurked in the body of that beardless youth. A special impulse is almost always necessary to bring a man of genius into the foreground.

The sledge-hammer of Fate, which strikes down the one so easily, suddenly finds the counter-impact of steel when it strikes at the other, and after the common shell of everyday life is broken, the core that lay hidden is displayed to the eyes of an astonished world.

This surrounding world then grows perverse and will not believe that what had seemed so like itself is really of that different quality so suddenly displayed.


This is a process which is repeated probably every time a man of outstanding significance appears.

Though an inventor, for example, does not establish his fame until the very day on which he completes his invention, it would be a mistake to believe that the creative genius did not become alive in him until that moment. From the very hour of his birth, the spark of genius is alive within the man who has been endowed with the real creative faculty.

True genius is an innate quality. It can never be the result of education or training. As I have stated already, this holds good not merely of the individual but also of the race.

Those peoples who manifest creative ability in certain periods of their history have always been fundamentally creative. It belongs to their very nature, even though this fact may escape the eyes of the superficial observer. Here also, recognition from outside is only the consequence of practical achievement.

Since the rest of the world is incapable of recognising genius as such, it can only see the visible manifestations of genius in the form of inventions, discoveries, buildings, paintings, etc., but even here a long time passes before recognition is given.

Just as the individual person who has been endowed with the gift of genius, or at least talent of a very high order, cannot develop that gift to the full until he comes under the urge of special circumstances, so in the life of the nations their creative capacities and powers frequently have to wait until certain conditions stimulate them to action.

The most obvious example of this truth is furnished by that race which has been, and still is, the champion of human progress; I mean the Aryan race.

As soon as Fate brings them face to face with special circumstances, their powers begin to develop progressively and to be manifested in tangible form. The characteristic cultures which they create in such circumstances are almost always conditioned by the soil, the climate, and the people they subjugate.


The last factor—that of the character of the people—is the most decisive one. The more primitive the technical condition under which the civilizing process takes place, the more necessary the existence of manual labour which can be organised and employed so as to take the place of mechanical power.

Had it not been possible for them to employ members of the inferior race which they conquered, the Aryans would never have been in a position to take the first steps on the road which led them to their culture of a later era; just as, without the help of certain suitable animals, which they were able to tame, they would never have come to the invention of mechanical power, which has subsequently enabled them to do without these animals.

The remark that the Moor, having done his duty, could now go, can, unfortunately, be applied more or less universally.

For thousands of years the horse has been the faithful servant of man and has helped him to lay the foundations of human progress; but now, motor power has rendered the horse superfluous.

In a few years, the use of the horse will cease entirely; and yet without its collaboration man could scarcely have reached the stage of development at which he now is.

For the establishment of superior types of civilisation, the members of inferior races formed one of the most essential prerequisites. They alone could supply the lack of mechanical means, without which no progress is possible.

It is certain that the first stages of human civilisation were not based so much on the use of tame animals as on the employment of human beings who were members of an inferior race.

Only after subjugated races were employed as slaves was a similar fate allotted to animals, and not vice versa, as some people would have us believe.

At first it was the conquered enemy who had to draw the plough and only afterwards did the ox and horse take his place. Nobody but puling pacifists can consider this fact a sign of human degradation.

Such people fail to recognise that this evolution had to take place in order that man might reach that degree of civilisation which these apostles now exploit in an attempt to make the world pay attention to their rigmarole.


The progress of mankind may be compared to the process of ascending an infinite ladder. One does not reach the higher level without first having climbed the lower rungs.

The Aryan, therefore, had to take that road which his sense of reality pointed out to him, and not that of which the modern pacifist dreams.

The path of reality is, however, difficult and hard to tread; yet it is the only one which finally leads to the goal where the others envisage mankind in their dreams.

The real truth is that those dreamers help to lead man away from his goal rather than toward it.

It was not by mere chance that the first forms of civilisation arose where the Aryan came into contact with inferior races, subjugated them, and forced them to obey his command.

The members of the inferior race became the first mechanical tools in the service of a growing civilisation. Thereby the way was clearly indicated which the Aryan had to follow.

As a conqueror, he subjugated inferior races and turned their physical powers into organised channels under his own leadership, forcing them to follow his will and purpose.

By imposing on them a useful, though hard, manner of employing their powers, he not only spared the lives of those whom he had conquered, but probably made their lives easier than they had been in the former state of so-called ‘freedom.’

While he ruthlessly maintained his position as their master, he not only remained master, but he also preserved and advanced civilisation, for this depended exclusively on his inborn abilities and, therefore, on the preservation of the Aryan race as such.

As soon, however, as his subjects began to rise and approach the level of their conqueror, a phase of which ascension was probably the use of his language, the barriers that had distinguished master from servant broke down.

The Aryan neglected to maintain his own racial stock unmixed and thereby lost the right to live in the paradise which he himself had created. He


became submerged in the racial mixture and gradually lost his cultural creativeness, until he finally grew, not only mentally but also physically, more like the aborigines whom he had subjected rather than his own ancestors.

For some time he could continue to live on the capital of that culture which still remained; but a condition of fossilisation soon set in and he sank into oblivion.

That is how cultures and empires decline and yield their places to new structures.

The adulteration of the blood and racial deterioration conditioned thereby are the only causes that account for the decline of ancient civilisations, for it is never by war that nations are ruined, but by the loss of their powers of resistance, which are exclusively a characteristic of pure racial blood. In this world everything that is not of sound racial stock is like chaff.

Every historical event in the world is nothing more nor less than a manifestation of the instinct of racial self-preservation, whether for weal or woe.

The question as to the basic reasons for the predominant importance of Aryanism can be answered by pointing out that it is not so much that the Aryans are endowed with a stronger instinct for self-preservation, but rather that this manifests itself in a way which is peculiar to themselves.

Considered from the subjective standpoint, the will to live is, of course, equally strong all round and only the forms in which it is expressed are different.

Among the most primitive organisms, the instinct for self-preservation does not extend beyond the care of the individual ego.

Egotism, as we call this passion, is so predominant that it includes even the time element, which means that the present moment is deemed the most important and that nothing is left to the future.

The animal lives only for itself, searching for food only when it feels hunger, and fighting only for the preservation of its own life.

As long as the instinct for self-preservation manifests itself exclusively in such a way, there is no basis for the establishment of a community, not even


the most primitive form of all, that is to say, the family.

The community formed by the male with the female, where it goes beyond the mere conditions of mating, calls for the extension of the instinct of self-preservation, since the readiness to fight for one’s own ego has to be extended also to the mate.

The male sometimes provides food for the female, but in most cases both parents provide food for the offspring. Almost always they are ready to protect and defend each other, so that here we find the first, though infinitely simple, manifestation of the spirit of sacrifice.

As soon as this spirit extends beyond the narrow limits of the family, we have the conditions under which a larger community and finally even States can be formed.

The lowest species of human beings give evidence of this quality only to a very small degree, so that often they do not go beyond the foundation of the family.

With an increasing readiness to place their immediate personal interests in the background, the capacity for organising more extensive communities develops.

The readiness to sacrifice one’s personal work and, if necessary, even one’s life, for others shows its most highly developed form in the Aryan race. The greatness of the Aryan is not based on his intellectual powers but rather on his willingness to devote all his faculties to the service of the community.

Here the instinct for self-preservation has reached its noblest form, for the Aryan willingly subordinates his own ego to the common weal and, when necessity calls, he will even sacrifice his own life for the community.

The constructive powers of the Aryan and that peculiar ability he has for the building up of a culture are not grounded in his intellectual gifts alone.

If that were so, he might only be destructive and could never have the ability to organise; for the essence of organising activity consists in the readiness of the individual to renounce his own personal opinions and interests and to lay both at the service of the human group.


By serving the common weal, he receives his reward in return; he does not, for example, work directly for himself but makes his productive work a part of the activity of the group to which he belongs, not only for his own benefit but for the general welfare.

The spirit underlying this attitude is expressed by the word WORK which to him does not at all signify a means of earning one’s daily livelihood but rather a productive activity which cannot clash with the interests of the community.

Whenever human activity is directed exclusively to the service of the instinct for self-preservation, regardless of the general weal, it is called theft, usury, robbery, burglary, and so on.

This mental attitude, which forces self-interest to recede into the background in favour of the common weal, is the first prerequisite for any kind of really human civilisation.

It is out of this spirit alone that great human achievements have sprung, for which the original doers have scarcely ever received any recompense, but which turn out to be the source of abundant benefit for their descendants. It is this spirit alone which can explain why it so often happens that people can endure a harsh but honest existence which offers them no return for their toil except a poor and modest livelihood, but such a livelihood helps to consolidate the foundations on which the community exists.

Every worker, every peasant, every inventor, every government official, etc., who works without ever achieving fortune or prosperity for himself is a representative of this sublime ideal, even though he may never become conscious of the profound meaning of his own activity.

Everything that may be said of that kind of work which is the fundamental condition for providing food and the basic means of human progress is true even in a higher sense of work that is done for the protection of man and his civilisation.

The renunciation of one’s own life for the sake of the community is the crowning significance of the idea of all sacrifice. In this way only is it possible to protect what has been built up by man and to ensure that this will not be destroyed by the hand of man or of Nature.

In the German language we have a word which admirably expresses the


significance underlying all work. It is Pflichterfüllung (fulfilment of duty), which means the service of the common weal before the consideration of one’s own interests.

The fundamental spirit out of which this kind of activity springs is the reverse of ‘egotism,’ and we call it ‘idealism.’ By this we mean to signify the willingness of the individual to, make sacrifices for the community and his fellow-men.

It is of the utmost importance to insist again and again that idealism is not merely a superfluous manifestation of sentiment but rather something which has been, is, and always will be, a necessary precondition of human civilisation; it is to this that the very conception ‘human’ owes its origin.

To this kind of mentality the Aryan owes his position in the world, and, the world is indebted to the Aryan mind for having developed the concept of ‘mankind,’ for it was out of this spirit alone that the creative force grew, which in a unique way, combined robust muscular power with a first-class intellect, and thus created the monuments of human civilisation.

Were it not for idealism, all the faculties of the intellect, even the most brilliant, would be nothing but intellect itself, a mere external phenomenon without inner value, and never a creative force.

Since true idealism, however, is essentially the subordination of the interests and life of the individual to the interests and life of the community, and since this subordination in turn represents the prerequisite condition for every form of organisation, this idealism accords in its innermost essence with the final purpose of Nature.

This idealism alone makes men voluntarily acknowledge that strength and power are entitled to take the lead and makes them a constituent particle of that order out of which the whole universe is shaped and formed.

Without being conscious of it, the purest idealism is always associated with the most profound knowledge. How True this is and how little genuine idealism has to do with fantastic self-dramatization will become clear the moment we ask an unspoilt child, a healthy boy, for example, to give his opinion.

The very same boy who listens to the rantings of an ‘idealistic’ pacifist without understanding them, and even rejects them, would readily sacrifice his


young life for the ideal of his people.

Unconsciously, his instinct will submit to the knowledge that the preservation of the species, even at the cost of the individual life, is a primal necessity and he will protest against the fantasies of pacifist ranters, who are in reality nothing better than cowardly, though camouflaged, egotists, who contradict the laws of human development.

It is an essential aspect of human evolution that the individual should be imbued with the spirit of sacrifice in favour of the common weal; he should not be influenced by the morbid notions of those who pretend to know better than Nature and who have the impudence to criticise her decrees.

It is just at those junctures when the idealistic attitude threatens to disappear that we notice a weakening of this force which is a necessary constituent in the founding and maintenance of the community and is therefore a necessary condition of civilisation.

As soon as the spirit of egotism begins to prevail among a people, then the bonds of the social order break, and man, by seeking his own personal happiness, tumbles out of heaven and falls into hell.

Posterity will not remember those who pursued only their own individual interests, but it will praise those heroes who renounced their own happiness.

The Jew offers the most striking contrast to the Aryan. There is probably no other people in the world which has so developed the instinct of self-preservation as the so-called ‘chosen’ race.

The best proof of this statement is to be found in the simple fact that this race still exists. Where is another people to be found that in the course of the last two thousand years has undergone so few changes in mental outlook and character as the ‘Jewish’ people?

And yet what other people has played such a constant part in the great revolutions? Even after having passed through the most gigantic catastrophes that have overwhelmed mankind, the Jews remain the same as ever.

What an infinitely tenacious will to live, to preserve one’s kind, is demonstrated by that fact!


The intellectual faculties of the Jew have been trained throughout thousands of years. To-day the Jew is looked upon as especially ‘clever’ and in a certain sense, he has been so throughout the ages. His intellectual powers, however, are not the result of an inner evolution but have rather been shaped by the object lessons he has received from

The human spirit cannot climb upward without taking successive steps. For every step upward it needs the foundation of what has been constructed before, namely, the past, which, in the comprehensive sense here employed, can have been laid only by a general civilisation.

All thinking originates only to a very small degree in personal experience. The largest part is based on the accumulated experiences of the past. The general level of civilisation provides the individual, who, in most cases, is not consciously aware of the fact, with such an abundance of preliminary knowledge, that with this equipment he can more easily take
further steps on the road of progress.

The boy of to-day, for example, grows up among such an overwhelming mass of technical achievement, which has accumulated during the last century, that he takes for granted many things which, a hundred years ago, were still mysteries even to the greatest minds of those times.

Yet these things that are now so much a matter of course are of enormous importance to those who would understand the progress we have made in certain spheres and would carry that progress a step farther.

If a man of genius belonging to the twenties of the last century were to rise from his grave to-day, he would find it more difficult to understand our present age than the contemporary boy of fifteen years of age who may even have only an average intelligence. The man of genius, thus come back from the past, would need to provide himself with an extraordinary amount of preliminary information which our contemporary youth receives automatically, so to speak, during the time of growing up among the products of our modern civilisation.

Since the Jew—for reasons that I shall deal with immediately—never


had a civilisation of his own, he has always been furnished by others with a basis for his intellectual work. His intellect has always been developed by the use of those cultural achievements he has found ready to hand around him. The process has never been the reverse.

Although among the Jews the instinct of self-preservation has not been weaker but much stronger than among other peoples, and although the impression may easily be created that the intellectual powers of the Jew are at least equal to those of other races, the Jews completely lack the most essential prerequisite of a cultural people, namely, the idealistic spirit.

With the Jewish people the spirit of self-sacrifice does not extend beyond the simple instinct of individual preservation.

In their case, the feeling of racial solidarity which they apparently manifest, is nothing but a very primitive gregarious instinct, similar to that which may be found among other organisms in this world.

It is a remarkable fact that this herd instinct brings individuals together for mutual protection only as long as there is a common danger which makes mutual assistance expedient or inevitable.

The same pack of wolves which, a moment ago, joined together in a common attack on their victim will dissolve into individual wolves as soon as their hunger has been satisfied.
This is also true of horses, which unite to defend themselves against any aggressor but separate the moment the danger is over.

It is much the same with the Jew. His spirit of sacrifice is only apparent. It manifests itself only as long as the existence of the individual makes this a matter of absolute necessity, but as soon as the common foe is conquered, the danger which threatened the individual Jew overcome and the prey secured, then the apparent harmony disappears and the original conditions obtain again.

Jews act in concord only when a common danger threatens them or a common prey attracts them. Where these two motives no longer exist, then the most brutal egotism appears and these people, who had previously lived together in unity, will turn into a swarm of rats that fight bitterly against each other.


If the Jews were the only people in the world, they would be wallowing in filth and mire and would exploit one another and try to exterminate one another in a bitter struggle, except in so far as their utter lack of the ideal of sacrifice, which shows itself in their cowardly spirit, would prevent this struggle from developing.

It would, therefore, be a complete mistake to interpret the mutual help the Jews render one another when they have to fight or, to put it more accurately, to exploit their fellow-beings, as the expression of a certain idealistic spirit of sacrifice.

Here again, the Jew merely follows the call of his individual egotism.

That is why the Jewish State, which ought to be a vital organisation to serve the purpose of preserving or increasing the race, has absolutely no territorial boundaries, for the territorial delimitation of a State always demands a certain idealism of spirit on the part of the race which forms that State, and especially a proper acceptance of the idea of work.

A State which is territorially delimited cannot be established or maintained, unless the general attitude toward work is a positive one. If this attitude is lacking, then the necessary basis of a civilisation is also lacking.

That is why the Jewish people, despite the intellectual powers with which they are apparently endowed, have not a culture, certainly not a culture of their own. The culture which the Jew enjoys to-day is the product of the work of others and this product is debased in the hands of the Jew.

In order to form a correct judgment of the place the Jew holds in relation to the whole problem of human civilisation, we must bear in mind the essential fact that there never has been any Jewish art, and consequently that nothing of this kind exists to-day.

We must realise that, especially in the two royal domains of art, namely, architecture and music, the Jew has done no original creative work.

When the Jew comes to producing something in the field of art he merely ‘borrows’ from something already in existence, or simply steals the intellectual work of others. The Jew essentially lacks the qualities which are characteristic of those creative races that are the founders of civilisation.


To what extent the Jew appropriates the civilisation built up by others—or to speak more accurately, corrupts it—is indicated by the fact that he cultivates chiefly the art which calls for the smallest amount of original invention, namely the dramatic arts, and even here, he is nothing better than a kind of juggler or, perhaps more correctly, a kind of monkey imitator, for in this domain also he lacks the creative élan which is necessary for the production of all really great work.

Even here, therefore, he is not a creative genius, but rather a superficial imitator who, in spite of all his retouching and tricks, cannot disguise the fact that there is no inner vitality in the shape he gives his products.

At this juncture, the Jewish press comes in and renders friendly assistance by shouting hosannas over the head of even the most ordinary bungler of a Jew, until the rest of the world is persuaded into thinking that the object of so much praise must really be an artist, whereas in reality, he may be nothing more than a low-class mimic.

The Jews have not the creative ability which is necessary for the founding of a civilisation, for in them there is not, and never has been, that spirit of idealism which is an absolutely necessary element in the higher development of mankind.

Therefore, the Jewish intellect will never be constructive, but always destructive. At best, it may serve as a stimulus in rare cases, but only in the limited meaning of the poet’s lines, “The Power which always wills the bad, and always works the good” (Die stets Böse will und stets das Gute schafft.).

It is not through him, but in spite of him, that mankind makes progress.

Since the Jew has never had a State based on territorial delimitations, and therefore never a civilisation of his own, the idea arose that here we were dealing with a people who had to be considered as nomads.

That is a great and mischievous mistake. The true nomad does actually possess a definite delimited territory where he lives. It is merely that he does not cultivate it, as the settled farmer does, but that he lives on the products of his herds with which he wanders over his domain.

The natural reason for this mode of existence is to be found in the fact that the soil is not fertile and that it does not give the steady produce which makes a fixed abode possible.


Outside of this natural cause, however, there is a more profound cause, namely, that no mechanical civilisation is at hand to make up for the natural poverty of the region in question.

There are territories where the Aryan can establish fixed settlements by means of the technical skill he has developed in the course of more than a thousand years, even though these territories would otherwise have to be abandoned, unless the Aryan were willing to wander about them in nomadic fashion, but age-long tradition of settled residence have made the nomadic life unbearable for him.

We ought to remember that during the first period of American colonisation, numerous Aryans earned their daily livelihood as trappers, hunters, etc., frequently wandering about in large groups with their women and children, their mode of existence very much resembling that of ordinary nomads.

The moment, however, that they grew more numerous and were able to accumulate larger resources, they cleared the land and drove out the aborigines, at the same time establishing settlements which rapidly increased all over the country.

The Aryan himself was probably at first a nomad and became a settler in the course of the ages, but yet he was never of the Jewish kind. The Jew is not a nomad, for the nomad has already a definite attitude towards the concept of ‘work,’ and this attitude served as the basis of a later cultural development when the necessary intellectual conditions existed.

There is a certain amount of idealism in the general attitude of the nomad, even though it is rather primitive. His whole character may, therefore, be foreign to Aryan feeling, but it will never be repulsive.

Not even the slightest trace of idealism exists, however, in the Jewish character. The Jew has never been a nomad, but always a parasite, battening on the substance of others. If he occasionally abandoned regions where he had hitherto lived, he did not do it voluntarily. He did it because, from time to time, he was driven out by people who were tired of having their hospitality, abused by such guests.

Jewish self-expansion is a parasitic phenomenon, since the Jew is


always looking for ‘pastures new’ for his race. But this has nothing to do with nomadic life as such, because the Jew does not ever think of leaving a territory which he has once occupied. He sticks where he is with such tenacity that he can hardly be driven out even by superior physical force.

He expands into new territories only when certain conditions for his existence are provided therein; but even then—unlike the nomad—he will not change his former abode. He is, and remains, a parasite, a sponger who, like a pernicious bacillus, spreads over wider and wider areas according as some favourable area attracts him.

The effect produced by his presence is also like that of the vampire, for wherever he establishes himself the people who grant him hospitality are bound to be bled to death sooner or later.

Thus the Jew has at all times lived in States that have belonged to other races, and within the organisation of those States, he has formed a State of his own, which is, however, hidden behind the mask of a ‘religious community,’ as long as external circumstances do not make it advisable for this community to declare its true nature.

As soon as the Jew feels himself sufficiently established in his position to be able to hold it without a disguise, he lifts the mask and suddenly appears in the character which so many did not formerly believe or wish to see, namely, that of the Jew.

The life which the Jew lives as a parasite thriving on the substance of other nations and States has resulted in developing that specific character which Schopenhauer once described when he spoke of the Jew as ‘the great master of lies.’

The kind of existence which he leads forces the Jew to the systematic use of falsehood, just as naturally as the inhabitants of northern climates are forced to wear warm clothes.
He can live among other nations and States only as long as he succeeds in persuading them that the Jews are not a distinct people but the representatives of a religious faith who thus constitute a ‘religious community,’ though this is of a peculiar character. As a matter of fact, however, this is the first of his great falsehoods. He is obliged to conceal his own particular character and mode of life, in order


that he may be allowed to continue his existence as a parasite among the nations.

The greater the intelligence of the individual Jew, the better will he succeed in deceiving others. His success in this line may even go so far that the people who grant him hospitality are led to believe that the Jew among them is a genuine Frenchman, for instance, or Englishman or German or Italian, who just happens to belong to a religious denomination which is different from that prevailing in these countries.

Especially in circles concerned with the executive administration of the State, where the officials generally have only a minimum of historical sense, the Jew is able to impose his infamous deception with comparative ease. In these circles, independent thinking is considered a sin against the sacred rules according to which official promotion takes place.

It is, therefore, not surprising that even to-day in the Bavarian government offices, for example, there is not the slightest suspicion that the Jews form a distinct nation in themselves and are not merely the adherents of a ‘confession,’ though one glance at the press which belongs to the Jews ought to furnish sufficient evidence to the contrary even for those who possess only the smallest degree of intelligence.

The Jewish Echo, however, is not an official gazette and therefore not authoritative in the eyes of these government potentates.

The Jews have always been a people of a definite racial character and never merely the adherents of a religion.

At a very early date, urged on by the desire to make their way in the world, they began to cast about for a means whereby they might distract such attention as might prove inconvenient for them.

What could be more effective, and at the same time above suspicion, than to borrow and utilise the idea of the religious community?

Here also everything is copied, or rather stolen, for the Jew could not possess any religious institution which had developed out of his own consciousness, seeing that he lacks every kind of idealism, which means that belief in a life beyond this terrestrial existence is foreign to him.

In the Aryan mind no religion can ever be imagined unless it embodies


the conviction that life in some form or other will continue after death. As a matter of fact, the Talmud is not a book that lays down principles according to which the individual should prepare for the life to come. It only furnishes rules for a practical and convenient life in this world.

The religious teaching of the Jews is principally a collection of instructions for maintaining the Jewish blood pure and for regulating intercourse between Jew and Jew and between Jews and the rest of the world, that is to say non-Jews.

The Jewish religious teaching is not concerned with moral problems. It is concerned rather with economic problems, and very petty ones at that. In regard to the moral value of the religious teaching of the Jews there exist, and always have existed, exhaustive studies (not from the Jewish side, for whatever the Jews have written on this question has naturally always been of a tendentious character) which show up the kind of religion that the Jews have in a light which makes it look very uncanny to the Aryan mind.

The Jew himself is the best example of the kind of product which this religious training evolves. His life is of this world only and his mentality is as foreign to the true spirit of Christianity as his character was foreign to the great Founder of the new creed two thousand years ago.

The Founder of Christianity made no secret of His estimation of the Jewish people; when He found it necessary, He drove those enemies of the human race out of the Temple of God, because then, as always, they used religion as a means of advancing their commercial interests.

At that time Christ was nailed to the Cross for his attitude toward the Jews, whereas our modern Christians enter into party politics, and when elections are being held they debase themselves to beg for Jewish votes.

They even enter into political intrigues with the atheistic Jewish parties against the interests of their own Christian nation.

On this first and fundamental lie, the purpose of which is to make people believe that Jewry is not a people, but a religion, other lies are subsequently based.

One of these further lies concerns, for example, the language spoken by


the Jew. For him language is not an instrument for the expression of his inner thoughts, but rather a means of cloaking them.

When talking French his thoughts are Jewish, and when writing German rhymes he only gives expression to the character of his own race.

As long as the Jew has not succeeded in mastering other peoples, he is forced to speak their language whether he likes it or not, but the moment that the world became the slave of the Jew, it would have to learn some universal language (Esperanto, for example) so that by this means the Jew could dominate it the more easily.

How much the whole existence of this people is based on a permanent falsehood is proved in a unique way by ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,’ which are so violently repudiated by the Jews.

With groans and moans, the Frankfurter Zeitung repeats again and again that these are forgeries. This alone is evidence in favour of their authenticity.

What many Jews unconsciously wish to do is here clearly set forth. It is not necessary to ask out of what Jewish brain these revelations sprang, but what is of vital interest is that they disclose, with an almost terrifying precision, the mentality and methods of action characteristic of the Jewish people and these writings expound, in all their various aspects, the final aims toward which the Jews are striving.

The study of real happenings, however, is the best way of judging the authenticity of these documents. If the historical developments, which have taken place within the last century, be studied in the light of this book, we shall understand why the Jewish press incessantly repudiates and denounces it, for the Jewish peril will be stamped out the moment the general public comes into possession of that book and understands it.

In order to get to know the Jew properly, it is necessary to study the road which he has been following among the other peoples during the last few centuries.

One example will suffice to make this clear. Since his career has been the same throughout the ages—just as the people at whose expense he has lived have remained the same—it will be best for the purpose of making the requisite analysis to mark his progress by stages. For the sake of simplicity, we shall indicate these stages by letters of the alphabet.


The first Jews came into what was then called Germania during the period of the Roman invasion, and, as usual, they came as merchants.

During the turmoil caused by the great migrations of the German tribes, the Jews seem to have disappeared. We may, therefore, consider the period when the Germans formed the first political communities as the beginning of that process whereby Central and Northern Europe were again, and this time permanently, Judaised.

A development then began which has always been the same or similar, wherever and whenever Jews came into contact with Aryan peoples.

(a) As soon as the first permanent settlements had been established, the Jew was suddenly ‘there.’ He arrived as a merchant and, in the beginning, did not trouble to disguise his nationality.

He still remained openly a Jew, partly it may be, because his appearance betrayed the racial difference between him and the people of the country in which he dwelt, or because he knew too little of the language. It may also be that people of other races refused to mix with him, so that he could not very well adopt any other pose than that of a foreign merchant.

Because of his subtlety and cunning and the lack of experience on the part of the people whose guest he became, it was not to his disadvantage openly to retain his Jewish character. This may even have been advantageous to him, for the foreigner was
received kindly.

(b) Slowly but steadily, he began to take part in the economic life around him, not as a producer, however, but only as a middleman.

His commercial cunning, acquired through thousands of years of negotiation as an intermediary, made him superior in this field to the Aryans, who were still quite ingenuous and indeed clumsy, and whose honesty was unlimited, so that after a short time commerce seemed destined to become a Jewish monopoly.

The Jew began by lending out money and, as usual, at a usurious rate of interest. It was he who first introduced the payment of interest on borrowed money.


The danger which this innovation involved was not at first recognised; indeed, the innovation was welcomed, because it offered momentary advantages.

(c) At this stage the Jew had become firmly settled; that is to say, he inhabited special sections of the cities and towns and had his own quarter in the market-towns. Thus he gradually came to form a State within the State.

He came to look upon the commercial domain and all monetary transactions as a privilege belonging exclusively to himself, and exploited it ruthlessly.

(d) At this stage, finance and trade had become his complete monopoly.

Finally, his usurious rate of interest aroused opposition, and the increasing impudence which the Jew began to manifest all round stirred up popular indignation, while his display of wealth gave rise to popular envy.

The cup of his iniquity became full to the brim when he included landed property among his commercial wares and degraded the land to the level of a market commodity.

Since he himself never cultivated the soil but considered it as an object to be exploited, allowing the peasant to remain on the land, but only on condition that he submitted to the most heartless exactions of his new master, public antipathy against the Jew steadily increased and finally turned into open animosity.

His extortionate tyranny became so unbearable that people rebelled against his control and used physical violence against him. They began to scrutinise this foreigner somewhat more closely and then began to discover the repulsive traits and characteristics inherent in him, until finally the gulf between the Jews and their hosts could no longer be bridged.

In times of distress a wave of public anger has usually arisen against the Jew; the masses have taken the law into their own hands; they have seized Jewish property and ruined the Jew in their urge to protect themselves against what they consider to be a scourge of God.

Having come to know the Jew intimately in the course of centuries, they looked upon his presence among them as a public danger comparable only to the plague.


(e) Then the Jew began to reveal his true character. He paid court to governments, with servile flattery, used his money to ingratiate himself further and thus regularly secured for himself once again the privilege of exploiting his victims.

Although public wrath flared up against this eternal profiteer and drove him out, after a few years he reappeared in those same places and carried on as before. No persecution could force him to give up his trade of exploiting other people and no amount of harrying succeeded in driving him out permanently.

He always returned after a short time and it was always the old story with him. In an effort to prevent at least the worst from happening, laws were passed which debarred the Jew from obtaining possession of land.

(f) In proportion as the powers of kings and princes increased, the Jew sidled up to them. He begged for ‘charters’ and ‘privileges’ which those gentlemen, who were generally in financial straits, gladly granted if they received adequate payment in return.

However high the price he has to pay, the Jew will succeed in getting it back within a few years with interest and even with compound interest thanks to the privilege he has acquired. He is a real leech who clings to the body of his unfortunate victims and cannot be removed, so that when the princes found themselves in need once again the Jew took the blood from his swollen veins with their own hands.

This game was repeated unendingly. In the case of those who were called the ‘German princes,’ the part they played was quite as contemptible as that played by the Jew. They were a real scourge to their people. Their compeers may be found in some of the government ministers of our time. It was due to the German princes that the German nation could not succeed in definitely freeing itself from the Jewish peril.

Unfortunately, the situation did not change at a later period. The princes finally received the reward which they had a thousand-fold deserved for all the crimes committed by them against their own people. They had allied themselves with Satan and later on they discovered that they were in Satan’s power.

(g) By permitting themselves to be entangled in the toils of the Jew, the


princes prepared their own downfall. The position which they held among their people was slowly but steadily undermined, not only by their continued failure to guard the interests of their subjects, but by their positive exploitation of them.

The Jew calculated exactly the time when the downfall of the princes was approaching and did his best to hasten it. He intensified their financial difficulties by hindering them in the exercise of their duty towards their people, by encouraging them, through the most servile flattery, to indulge in vicious habits, whereby he made himself more and more indispensable to them.

His astuteness, or rather, his utter unscrupulousness in money affairs enabled him to exact fresh payments from the princes’ subjects, to squeeze the money out of them and then have it spent as quickly as possible.

Every Court had its ‘Court Jew,’ as this plague was called, who tortured the innocent victims until they were driven to despair, while at the same time he provided the means which the princes squandered on their own pleasures.

It is not to be wondered at that these ornaments of the human race became the recipients of official honours and were even admitted to the ranks of the hereditary nobility, thus contributing not only to expose that social institution to ridicule but also to contaminate it from the inside.

Naturally, the Jew could now exploit the position which he had attained and advance even more rapidly than before.

Finally, he only needed to be baptised in order to become entitled to all the rights and privileges which belonged to the children of the nation on which he preyed.

This was an excellent stroke of business for him, and he often availed himself of it, to the great joy of the Church, which was proud of having gained a new child in the Faith, and also to the joy of Israel, which was happy at seeing the trick pulled off successfully.

(h) At this stage a transformation began to take place in the world of Jewry. Up to now they had been Jews, that is to say, they had not hitherto set any great value on pretending to be something else, and anyhow, the distinctive characteristics which separated them from other races could not be easily overcome.


Even as late as the time of Frederick the Great, nobody looked upon the Jews as other than a ‘foreign’ people, and Goethe rose up in revolt against the failure legally to prohibit marriage between Christians and Jews. Goethe was certainly no reactionary and no timeserver; through him there spoke the voice of the blood and the voice of reason.

Notwithstanding the disgraceful happenings taking place in Court circles, the people recognised instinctively that the Jew was the foreign body in their own flesh and their attitude toward him was dictated by recognition of that fact.

But a change was now destined to take place. In the course of more than a thousand years the Jew had learned to master the language of his hosts so thoroughly that he considered he might now lay less stress on his Jewish character and emphasise his ‘Germanism’ more.

Though it must have appeared ridiculous and absurd at first sight, he was impudent enough to call himself a ‘Teuton,’ which in this case, meant a German.

In that way began one of the most infamous impositions that can be imagined. The Jew did not possess the slightest traces of the German character. He had only acquired the art of twisting the German language to his own uses, and that in a disgusting way, without having assimilated any other feature of the German character. Therefore, his command of the language was the sole ground on which he could pretend to be a German.

It is not, however, by the tie of language, but exclusively by the tie of blood that the members of a race are bound together, and the Jew himself knows this better than any other, seeing that he attaches so little importance to the preservation of his own language while at the same time he strives his utmost to keep his blood free from intermixture with that of other races.

A man may acquire and use a new language without much trouble, but it is only his old ideas that he expresses through the new language; his inner nature is not modified thereby. The best proof of this is furnished by the Jew himself. He may speak a thousand tongues and yet his Jewish nature will always remain one and the same.

His distinguishing characteristics were the same when, as a grain-


merchant, he spoke the Latin language at Ostia two thousand years ago, as they are to-day when he tries to sell adulterated flour with the aid of his German gibberish. He is always the same Jew.

That so simple a fact is not recognised by the average head-clerk in a German government department, or by an officer in the police force, is also self-evident and obvious, since it would be difficult to find another class of people who are so lacking in instinct and intelligence as the civil servants employed by our modern German state authorities.

The reason why, at the stage I am dealing with, the Jew so suddenly decided to transform himself into a German is not difficult to discover. He felt the power of the princes slowly crumbling and therefore looked about to find a new social plank on which he might stand.

Furthermore, his financial domination in all the spheres of economic life had become so great that he felt he could no longer sustain that enormous structure, or extend his influence, unless he were admitted to the full enjoyment of the ‘rights of citizenship.’

He aimed at both, preservation and expansion; for the higher he could climb, the more alluring became the prospect of reaching the old goal, which was promised to him in ancient times, namely world domination to which he now looked toward with feverish eyes, as he thought he saw it within his grasp.

Therefore, all his efforts were now directed to becoming a fully-fledged citizen, endowed with all civil and political rights. That was the reason for his emancipation from the ghetto.

(i) Thus the Court Jew slowly developed into the democratic Jew, but naturally, he still remained associated with persons in higher quarters, and he even attempted to push his way further into the inner circles of the ruling set.

At the same time, some other representatives of his race were currying favour with the people.

If we remember the crimes the Jew had committed against the masses of the people in the course of so many centuries, how repeatedly and ruthlessly he had exploited them and how he had sucked the very marrow of their substance, and when we further remember how they gradually came to hate him and


finally considered him as public scourge, then we can well understand how difficult the Jew must have found this final transformation; indeed, it must have taxed all his powers to be able to present himself as ‘the friend of humanity’ to the poor victims whom he had bled white.

Therefore, the Jew began by making public amends for the crimes which he had committed against the people in the past.

He started his metamorphosis by first appearing as the ‘benefactor’ of humanity.

Since his new philanthropic policy had a very concrete aim in view, he could not very well apply to himself the biblical counsel, not to allow his left hand to know what his right hand was doing.

He felt obliged to let as many people as possible know how deeply the sufferings of the masses grieved him and to what excesses of personal sacrifice he was ready to go in order to help them.

With this manifestation of innate modesty, so typical of the Jew, he trumpeted his virtues to the world until finally the world actually began to believe him. Those who refused to share this belief were considered to be doing him an injustice.

Thus, after a little while he began to twist things round so as to make it appear that it was he who had always been wronged, and not vice versa. There were actually some particularly foolish people who could not help pitying this poor unfortunate creature of a Jew.

Attention may be called to the fact that, in spite of his proclaimed readiness to make personal sacrifices, the Jew never becomes poor thereby. He has a happy knack of always making both ends meet.

Occasionally, his benevolence might be compared to the manure which is not spread over the field merely out of kindness, but rather with a view to future produce.

Anyhow, after a comparatively short period of time, the world was given to know that the Jew had become a general benefactor and philanthropist. What a unique transformation!

What is looked upon as more or less natural when done by other people,


here became an object of astonishment, and even sometimes of admiration, because it was considered so unusual in a Jew.

That is why he has received more credit for his acts of benevolence than ordinary mortals. And something more! The Jew became liberal all of a sudden and began to talk enthusiastically of how human progress must be encouraged.

Gradually he assumed the air of being the herald of a new age. Yet, at the same time, he continued to undermine the groundwork of that economic system which is of most benefit to the people.

He bought up stock in the various national undertakings and thus pushed his influence into the circle of national production, making this latter an object of buying and selling on the Stock Exchange, or rather what might be called a pawn in a financial game of chess, thus ruining the only basis on which personal proprietorship is possible.

Only with the entrance of the Jew did that feeling of estrangement between employers and employees begin which led at a later date to the political class-struggle.

Finally, the Jew gained an increasing influence in all economic undertakings by means of his predominance on the Stock Exchange. He secured, if not the ownership, at least the control of the working capacity of the nation.

In order to strengthen his political position, he directed his efforts toward removing the barrier of racial and civic discrimination which had hitherto hindered his advance at every turn.

With characteristic tenacity he championed the cause of religious tolerance for this purpose, and in the Freemason organisation, which had fallen completely into his hands, he found a magnificent weapon which helped him to achieve his ends.

Government circles, as well as the higher sections of the political and commercial bourgeoisie, fell prey to his plans through his manipulation of the masonic net, though they themselves did not even suspect what was happening.

Only the people as such, or rather the masses which were just becoming conscious of their own power and were beginning to use it in the fight for their


rights and liberties, had hitherto escaped the grip of the Jew.

At least, his influence had not yet penetrated to the deeper and wider sections of the people, This was unsatisfactory to him.

The most important phase of his policy was therefore to secure control over the people.

The Jew realised that in his efforts to reach the position of public despot he would need a ‘pacemaker,’ and he thought he could find a pace-maker if he could whip-in sufficiently large sections of the bourgeoisie, but the Freemasons failed to catch the glove-manufacturers and the linen-weavers in the frail meshes of their net, and so it became necessary to find a grosser and withal a more effective means.

Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry had to be secured. This was the press. The Jew exercised all his skill and tenacity in getting hold of it.

By means of the press he began gradually to control public life in its entirety. He began to drive it along the road which he had chosen for the purpose of reaching his own ends, for he was now in a position to create and direct that force which, under the name of ‘public opinion,’ is better known today than it was some decades ago.

Simultaneously, the Jew gave himself the air of thirsting after knowledge.

He lauded every phase of progress, particularly those phases which led to the ruin of others, for he judges all progress and development from the standpoint of the advantages which these bring to his own people. When it brings him no such advantages, he is the deadly enemy of enlightenment and hates all culture which is real culture as such. All the knowledge which he acquires in the schools of others is exploited by him exclusively in the service of his own race.

He now guarded his Jewish ‘nationality’ more jealously than ever before. Though bubbling over with talk of ‘enlightenment,’ ‘progress,’ ‘liberty,’ ‘humanity,’ etc., his first care was to preserve the racial integrity of his own people.

He occasionally bestowed one of his female offspring on an influential Christian, but the racial stock of his male descendants was always preserved unmixed on principle. He poisoned the blood of others, but preserved his own blood unadulterated.


The Jew scarcely ever married a Christian girl, but the Christian took a Jewess to wife. The mongrels that were the issue of this latter union always took after the Jewish side. Thus a part of the higher nobility in particular became completely degenerate.

The Jew was well aware of this fact and systematically used this means of disarming the intellectual leaders of the opposite race. To mask his tactics and fool his victims, he talked of the equality of all men, no matter what their race or colour, and the simpletons began to believe him.

Since his whole nature still retained too much that was alien for the broad masses of the people to allow themselves to be caught in his snare, he used the press to put before the public a picture of himself which was entirely untrue to life but well designed to serve his purpose.

In the comic papers, special efforts were made to represent the Jews as an inoffensive little race which, like all others, had its peculiarities.

The comic papers presented the Jews as fundamentally goodhearted and honourable in spite of their manners, which might seem a bit strange. An attempt was generally made to make them appear insignificant, rather than dangerous.

During this phase of his progress, the chief goal of the Jew was the victory of democracy, or rather the supreme hegemony of the parliamentary system, which embodied his concept of democracy.

This institution harmonised best with his purpose, for thus the personal element was eliminated and in its place we had the dunder-headed majority, inefficiency and, last but by no means least, cowardice.

The final result must necessarily have been the overthrow of the monarchy, which had to come sooner or later.

(j) A tremendous economic development transformed the social structure of the nation. As the small handicrafts gradually disappeared, the manual worker was robbed of the chance of earning his bread independently and sank to the level of the proletariat.

In his stead came the factory worker, whose essential characteristic is


that he is seldom in a position to support himself independently in later life. In the true sense of the word, he is ‘disinherited.’ His old age is a misery to him and can hardly be called a life at all.

In earlier times, a similar situation had been created which had imperatively demanded a solution and for which a solution was found.

Side by side with the peasant and the artisan, a new class had gradually developed, namely, that of officials and employees, especially those employed in the various services of the State.

They also were a ‘disinherited’ class, in the true sense of the word, but the State found a remedy for this unhealthy situation by taking upon itself the duty of providing for the State official who was not in a position to make provision for his old age.

Thus the system of pensions and retiring allowances was introduced.

Private enterprises slowly followed this example in increasing numbers so that to-day every permanent non-manual worker receives a pension in his later years if the firm which he has served is one that has reached or exceeded a certain limit of size.

It was only by virtue of the assurance given to State officials that they would be cared for in their old age that such a high degree of unselfish devotion to duty was developed, which in pre-war times was one of the distinguishing characteristics of German officials.

Thus a whole class which had no personal property was saved from destitution by an intelligent system of provision and found a place in the social structure of the national community.

The problem has once again arisen for the State and the nation, but this time it is more comprehensive. When the new industries sprang up and developed, millions of people left the countryside and the villages to take up employment in the big factories.

The conditions under which this new class found itself forced to live were worse than miserable. The more or less mechanical transformation of the methods of work hitherto in vogue among the artisans and peasants did not fit in well with the habits or mentality of this new working-class.

The way in which the peasants and artisans had formerly worked had


nothing comparable to the intensive labour of the new factory-worker. In the old trades, time did not play a highly important role, but it became an essential element in the new industrial system.

The formal taking over of the old working hours by the mammoth industrial enterprises had fatal results. The actual amount of work hitherto accomplished within a certain time was comparatively small because the modern methods of intensive production were then unknown. Therefore, although under the older system a working day of fourteen or even fifteen hours was not unendurable, now it was beyond the limits of human endurance because under the new system every minute was utilised to the extreme.

This absurd transference of the old working hours to the new industrial system proved fatal in two directions.

Firstly, it ruined the health of the workers; secondly, it destroyed their faith in a superior law of justice.

Finally, on the one hand, a miserable wage was received and, on the other, the employer held a much more lucrative position than before.

In the open country there could be no social problem because the master and the farm-hand were doing the same kind of work and doing it together.

They ate their food in common, and sometimes even out of the same dish. But this, too, was altered. The division created between employer and employee seems now to have extended to all branches of life.

How far this Judaising process has been allowed to take effect among our people is illustrated by the fact that manual labour not only receives practically no recognition, but is even considered degrading.

That is not a natural German attitude. It is due to the introduction of a foreign element into our lives, and that foreign element is the Jewish spirit, one of the effects of which has been to transform the high esteem in which our handicrafts were once held into a certain contempt for all manual labour.

Thus a new social class has grown up which stands in low esteem, and the day must come when we shall have to face the question of whether the nation will be able to make this class an integral part of the social community or whether the difference of status now existing will become a permanent gulf


separating this class from the others.

One thing, however, is certain, namely, that this class does not include the worst elements of the community in its ranks. On the contrary, it includes the most energetic elements of the nation.

The sophistication which is the result of a so-called civilisation has not yet exercised its disintegrating and degenerating influence on this class. The broad masses of this new lower class, consisting of the manual labourers, have not yet fallen prey to the morbid weakness of pacifism. They are still robust and, if necessary, they can be brutal.

While our bourgeois middle class paid no attention at all to this momentous problem and indifferently allowed events to take their course, the Jew realised the manifold possibilities the situation offered him for the future.

While, on the one hand, he organised capitalistic methods of exploitation to the highest possible degree, he curried favour with the victims of his policy and his power and in a short while became the leader of their struggle against himself.

‘Against himself’ is here only a figurative way of speaking; for this ‘great master of lies’ knows how to appear in the guise of the innocent and throw the guilt on others.

Since he had the impudence to take a personal lead among the masses, they never for a moment suspected that they were falling a prey to one of the most infamous deceptions ever practised.

Yet that is what it actually was. The moment this new class had arisen out of the general economic situation and taken shape as a definite body in the social order, the Jew clearly saw where he would find the necessary pacemaker for his own progressive march.

At first he had used the bourgeois class as a battering-ram against the feudal order, and now he used the worker against the bourgeois world.

Just as he succeeded in obtaining civic rights by intrigues carried on under the protection of the bourgeois class, he now hoped that by joining in the struggle which the workers were waging for their own existence, he would be able to obtain the mastery he desired.


When that moment arrives, the only objective the workers will have to fight for will be the future of the Jewish people.

Without knowing it, the worker is placing himself at the service of the very power against which he believes he is fighting. Apparently he is being made to fight against capital and thus he is all the more easily brought to fight for capitalistic interests.

Outcries are systematically raised against international capital, but in reality it is against the national economic structure that these slogans are directed. The idea is to demolish this structure and on its ruins triumphantly erect the structure of the International Stock Exchange.

The method of procedure of the Jew was as follows: He kowtowed to the worker, hypocritically pretended to feel pity for him and his lot, and even to be indignant at the misery and poverty which he had to endure.

That is the way in which the Jew endeavoured to gain the confidence of the working class. He showed himself eager to study their various hardships, whether real or imaginary, and strove to awaken a yearning on the part of the workers to change the conditions under which they lived.

The Jew artfully enkindled that innate yearning for social justice which is a typical Aryan characteristic. Once that yearning became alive, it was transformed into hatred against those in more fortunate circumstances of life.

The next stage was to give a precise ideological aspect to the struggle for the elimination of social wrongs, and thus the Marxist doctrine was invented. By presenting this doctrine as part and parcel of a just vindication of social rights, the Jew propagated it all the more effectively, but at the same time he provoked the opposition of decent people who refused to admit these demands which, because of the form and pseudo-philosophical trimmings in which they were presented, seemed fundamentally unjust and unrealisable, for, under the cloak of purely social concepts there were hidden aims which were of a Satanic character.

These aims are even openly expounded with the clarity of unlimited impudence. This Marxist doctrine is an indivisible mixture of human reason and human absurdity, but the combination is arranged in such a way that only the absurd part of it could ever be put into practice, never the reasonable part.

By categorically repudiating the personal worth of the individual and


also of the nation and its racial constitution, this doctrine destroys the fundamental basis of all civilisation, for civilisation depends essentially on these very factors.

Such is the true essence of the Marxist Weltanschauung, in so far as the word Weltanschauung can be applied at all to these phantoms arising from a criminal brain.

The destruction of the concept of personality and of race removes the chief obstacle which barred the way to domination of the social body by its inferior elements, which are the Jews.

The very absurdity of the economic and political theories of Marxism gives the doctrine its peculiar significance.

Because of its pseudo-logic, intelligent people refuse to support it, while all those who are less accustomed to use their intellectual faculties, or who have only a rudimentary notion of economic principles, join the Marxist cause wholeheartedly.

The intelligence behind the movement—for even this movement needs intelligence if it is to subsist—is supplied by the Jews themselves, as a ‘sacrifice’ on their part.

Thus arose a movement composed exclusively of manual workers under the leadership of Jews. To all external appearances, this movement strives to ameliorate the conditions under which the workers live, but in reality its aim is to enslave and thereby annihilate the non-Jewish peoples.

The propaganda the Freemasons had carried on among the so-called intelligentsia, whereby their pacifist teaching paralysed the instinct for national self-preservation, was now extended to the broad masses of the workers and the bourgeoisie by means of the press, which was almost everywhere in Jewish hands.

To those two instruments of disintegration, a third and still more ruthless one was added, namely, the organisation of brute force. Massed columns of Marxist attackers were intended to complete the work of attrition that the two weapons formerly employed had brought to the verge of fulfilment.

The combined activity of all these forces has been marvellously


managed, and it will not be surprising if it turns out that those institutions which have always appeared as the organs of the more or less traditional authority of the State should now fall before the Marxist attack.

With very few exceptions, the Jew has found the most complacent promoters of his work of destruction among the higher, and even the highest, government officials.

An attitude of sneaking servility toward ‘superiors’ and supercilious arrogance toward ‘inferiors’ are the characteristics of this class of people, as well as an appalling stupidity exceeded only by its amazing self-conceit.

These qualities are of the greatest utility to the Jew in his dealings with our authorities and consequently he appreciates them.

If I were to sketch roughly the actual struggle which is now beginning, I should describe it somewhat thus:

Not satisfied with the economic conquest of the world, but demanding that it must also come under his political control, the Jew subdivides the organised Marxist power into two parts that correspond to the ultimate objectives to be fought for in this struggle carried on under his direction.

To outward appearance, these seem to be two independent movements, but in reality they constitute an indivisible unity.

The two divisions are the political movement and the trade-union movement.

The trade-union movement has to gather-in the recruits. It offers assistance and protection to the workers in the hard struggle they have to wage for the bare means of existence, a struggle which has been occasioned by the greediness and narrow-mindedness of many of the industrialists.

Unless the workers are ready to surrender all claims to an existence which the mere dignity of human nature itself demands, and unless they are ready to submit their fate to the will of employers who, in many cases, have no sense of human responsibility and are utterly callous to human wants, then the worker must necessarily take matters into his own hands, seeing that the organised social community—that is to say, the State—pays no attention to his



The so-called national-minded bourgeoisie, blinded by its own material interests, opposes this life-and-death struggle of the workers and places the most difficult obstacles in their way.

Not only does this bourgeoisie hinder all efforts to bring in legislation which would shorten the inhumanly long hours of work, prohibit child-labour, grant security and protection to women and improve the hygienic conditions in the workshops and the dwellings of the working class, but while it is engaged in so doing, the shrewd Jew takes the cause of the oppressed into his own hands.

He gradually becomes the leader of the trade-union movement, which is an easy task for him, because he does not genuinely intend to find remedies for the social wrong; he pursues only one objective, namely, to gather and consolidate a body of followers who will act under his command as an armed weapon in the economic war for the destruction of national economic independence.

For, while a sound social policy has to aim at a double objective, that of securing a decent standard of public health and welfare on the one hand, and that of safeguarding the independence of the economic life of the nation on the other, the Jew does not take these two aims into account at all.

The destruction of both is one of his main objects. He would ruin, rather than safeguard, the independence of the national economic system.

Therefore, as the leader of the trade-union movement, he has no scruples about putting forward demands which not only go beyond the declared purpose of the movement, but could not be carried into effect without ruining the national economic structure.

On the other hand, he has no interest in seeing a healthy and sturdy population develop; he would be more content to see the people degenerate into an unthinking herd which could be reduced to total subjection.

Because these are his final objectives, he can afford to put forward the most absurd claims.

He knows very well that these claims can never be realised and that, therefore, nothing in the actual state of affairs can be altered by them, but that


the most they can do is to arouse the spirit of unrest among the masses. That is exactly the purpose he wishes such propaganda to serve and not a real and honest improvement of the social status of the worker.

The Jews will, therefore, remain the unquestioned leaders of the trade-union movement as long as no far-reaching campaign is undertaken for the enlightenment of the masses, in order that they may be better enabled to understand the causes of their misery.

The same end might be achieved if the government authorities were to get rid of the Jew and his work, for as long as the masses remain as ill-informed as they actually are to-day, and as long as the State remains as indifferent to their lot as it now is, the masses will follow whatever leaders make them the most extravagant promises in regard to economic matters.

The Jew is a past-master in this art and his activities are not hampered by moral considerations of any kind. Naturally, it takes him only a short time to defeat all his competitors in this field and drive them from the scene of action.

In accordance with the general brutality and rapacity of his nature, he turns the trade-union movement into an organisation for the exercise of physical violence. The resistance and antipathy of those whose insight has hitherto saved them from swallowing the Jewish bait have been broken down by terrorism.

The success of that kind of activity is enormous. Actually, the Jew is using the trade-union, which could be a blessing to the nation, as a weapon with which to destroy the foundations of the national economic structure.

Side by side with this, the political organisation advances. It operates hand-in-hand with the trade-union movement, inasmuch as the latter prepares the masses for the political organisation and even forces them into it.

This is also the source that provides the money the political organisation needs to keep its enormous apparatus in action. The trade-union organisation is the organ of control for the political activity of its members and whips-in the masses for all great political

In the end, it ceases to struggle for economic interests but places its chief weapon, refusal to continue work (which takes the form of a general


strike) at the disposal of the political movement.

In a press, the reading matter of which is adapted to the level of the most ignorant readers, the political and trade-union organisations are provided with an instrument which prepares the lowest stratum of the nation for a campaign of ruthless destruction.

It is not considered part of the purpose of this press to inspire its readers with ideals which might help them to lift their minds above the sordid conditions of their daily lives, but, on the contrary, it panders to their lowest instincts.

Among the lazy-minded and self-seeking sections of the masses this kind of speculation turns out lucrative.

It is this press, above all, which carries on a fanatical campaign of calumny, strives to tear down everything that might be considered mainstay of national independence, cultural standing and economic self-sufficiency.

It aims its attacks especially against all men of character who refuse to fall into line with the Jewish efforts to obtain control over the State, or who appear dangerous to the Jews merely because of their superior intelligence.

In order to incur the enmity of the Jew it is not necessary to show any open hostility toward him; it is sufficient if a man is considered capable of opposing the Jew at some time in the future, or of using his abilities and character to enhance the power and position of a nation which the Jew considers hostile to himself.

The Jew’s instinct, which never fails where these problems have to be dealt with, readily discerns the true mentality of those whom he meets in everyday life, and those who are not of a kindred spirit may be sure of being listed among his enemies.

Since the Jew is not the object of aggression, but himself the aggressor, he considers as his enemies not only those who attack him, but also those who may be capable of resisting him.

The means which he employs to break people of this kind who show themselves decent and upright is no honourable conflict, but falsehood and calumny. He will stop at nothing. His utterly lowdown conduct is so appalling that one really cannot be surprised if, in the imagination of our people, Satan,


as the incarnation of all evil, assumes the form and features of the Jew.

The ignorance of the broad masses as regards the inner character of the Jew, and the lack of instinct and insight displayed by our upper classes, are among the reasons which explain how it is that so many people fall an easy prey to the systematic campaign of falsehood which the Jew carries on.

While the upper classes, with their innate cowardliness, turn away from anyone whom the Jew thus attacks with lies and calumny, the common people are credulous of everything, whether because of their ignorance or their simple-mindedness.

Government authorities wrap themselves in a cloak of silence, but more frequently they persecute the victims of Jewish attacks in order to stop the campaign in the Jewish press.

To the fatuous mind of the government official, such a line of conduct appears to be in line with the policy of upholding the authority of the State and preserving public order.

Gradually, the Marxist weapon in the hands of the Jew becomes a constant bogey to decent people and weighs upon them like a kind of nightmare. People begin to quail before this fearful foe and thereby become his victims.

(k) The domination of the Jew in the State seems now so fully assured that not only can he afford to call himself a Jew once again, but he even acknowledges freely and openly his ideas on racial and political questions.

A section of the Jews avows itself quite openly as an alien people, but even here there is another falsehood.

When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Aryan.

They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they are really aiming at is to establish a central organisation for their international swindling and cheating.

As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other


States. Therefore, it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out, and at the same time, a high school for the training of other swindlers. As a sign of their growing confidence and sense of security, a certain section of them openly and impudently proclaims its Jewish nationality, while another section hypocritically pretend to be German, French or English, as the case may be.

Their blatant behaviour in their relations with other people shows how clearly they envisage their day of triumph in the near future.

The black-haired Jewish youth lies in wait for hours on end, Satanically glaring at and spying on the unsuspecting girl whom he plans to seduce, adulterating her blood and removing her from the bosom of her own people.

The Jew uses every possible means to undermine the racial foundations of a people to be subjugated.

In his systematic efforts to ruin girls and women, he strives to break down the last barriers of racial discrimination.

The Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the White race which they hate, and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate.

As long as a people remains racially pure and race-conscious, it can never be overcome by the Jew. Never in this world can the Jew become master of any people except a bastardised people.

That is why the Jew systematically endeavours to lower the racial quality of a people by permanently adulterating the blood of the individuals who make up that people.

In the field of politics, he now begins to replace the idea of democracy by that of the dictatorship of the proletariat.

In the masses organised under the Marxist banners, he has found a weapon which makes it possible for him to discard democracy, so as to subjugate and rule the nations in a dictatorial fashion by the aid of brute force.

He works systematically in order to bring about this revolution by two methods, the economic and the political.

Aided by international influences, he forms a ring of enemies around


those nations which have proved themselves too sturdy for him in withstanding attacks from within.

He tries to force them into war and then, if it should be necessary to his plans, he will unfurl the banners of revolt even while the troops are actually fighting at the front.

Economically, he brings about the destruction of the State by a systematic method of sabotaging social enterprises until these become so costly that they are taken out of the hands of the State and submitted to the control of Jewish finance.

Politically, he works to withdraw from the State its means of subsistence, inasmuch as he undermines the foundations of national resistance and defence, destroys the confidence which the people have in their government, reviles the past and its history, and drags everything really great into the gutter.

Culturally, his activity consists in poisoning art, literature and the theatre, holding the expression of natural sentiment up to scorn, overturning all concepts of the sublime and beautiful, the worthy and the good, finally dragging the people down to the level of his own low mentality.

Of religion he makes a mockery. Morality and decency are described as antiquated prejudices and thus a systematic attack is made for the purpose of undermining those last foundations on which the national being must rest if the nation is to struggle for its existence in this world.

(l) Now begins the great and final revolution. As soon as the Jew is in possession of political power he drops all pretence. Out of the democratic Jew, the Jew of the people, arises the Jew lusting for blood, the tyrant of the peoples.

In the course of a few years, he endeavours to exterminate all those who represent the national intelligentsia, and by thus depriving the peoples of their natural intellectual leaders, he prepares them for their fate as slaves under a lasting despotism. Russia furnishes the most terrible example of such slavery.

In that country the Jew killed or starved thirty millions of the people in a bout of savage fanaticism and resorted to the employment of inhuman torture. He did this so that a gang of Jewish would-be literati and financial bandits should dominate over a great people.


The final consequence is not merely that the people lose all their freedom under the domination of the Jews, but that in the end, these parasites themselves disappear. The death of the victim is followed sooner or later by that of the vampire.

If we review all the causes which contributed to bring about the downfall of the German people we shall find that the most profound and decisive cause lies in lack of insight into the racial problem and especially in failure to recognise the Jewish menace. It would have been easy enough to endure the defeats suffered on the battlefields in August 1918. They were nothing as compared with the military victories our nation had achieved.

Our downfall was not the result of those defeats; we were overthrown by that force which had prepared those defeats by systematically operating for several decades to destroy those political instincts and that moral stamina which alone enable a people to struggle for its existence and thereby secure the right to exist.

By neglecting the problem of preserving the racial foundations of our national life, the old Reich abrogated the sole right which entitles a people to live on this planet.

Nations that make mongrels of their people or allow their people to be turned into mongrels, sin against the Will of Eternal Providence, and thus their overthrow at the hands of a stronger opponent cannot be looked upon as a wrong but, on the contrary, as a restoration of justice.

If a people refuses to guard and uphold the qualities with which it has been endowed by Nature and which have their roots in the racial blood, then such a people has no right to complain over the loss of its earthly existence.

Everything on this earth can be changed for the better.

Every defeat may be made the foundation of a future victory.

Every lost war may be the cause of a later resurgence.

Every form of distress can give a new impetus to human energy, and from oppression those forces can develop which bring about a re-birth of the national soul—provided always that the racial blood is kept pure.

The loss of racial purity will wreck inner happiness for ever.


It degrades men for all time to come, and the physical and moral consequences can never be wiped out.

If this unique problem be studied and compared with the other problems of life, we shall easily recognise how small is their importance in comparison with this.

They are all limited in time, but the problem of the maintenance or loss of the purity of the racial blood will last as long as man himself exists. All the symptoms of decline which manifested themselves in pre-war times can be traced back to the racial problem.

Whether one is dealing with questions of general law, of monstrous wrongs in economic life, of phenomena which point to a cultural decline or political degeneration, whether it be a question of defects in the school-system or of the evil influence which the press exerts over the adult population, in every case these phenomena are caused by a lack of consideration for the interests of the race to which one’s own nation belongs, or by failure to recognise the danger that comes from allowing a foreign race to exist within the national body.

That is why all attempts at reform, all institutions for social relief, all political striving, all economic progress, and all apparent increase in the general stock of knowledge, were doomed to be unproductive of any significant results.

The nation, as well as the organisation which enables it to exist, namely, the State, were not developing in inner strength and stability but were, on the contrary, visibly losing their vitality.

The false brilliance of the Second Reich could not disguise its inner weakness, and every attempt to invigorate it anew failed, because the main and most important problem was left out of consideration. It would be a mistake to think that the followers of the various political parties which tried to doctor the condition of the German people, or even all their leaders, were bad in themselves or meant wrong. Their activity was doomed to fail, merely because, at best, they saw nothing but the symptoms of our general malady and they tried to doctor the symptoms while they overlooked the real cause of the disease.

If one makes a methodical study of the lines along which the old Reich


developed, one cannot help seeing, after a careful political analysis, that a process of inner degeneration had already set in, even at the time when the united Reich was established and the German nation was enjoying prosperity.

The general situation was declining, in spite of apparent political success and in spite of increasing economic wealth. At the Reichstag elections, the growing number of Marxist votes indicated that the internal breakdown and the political collapse were rapidly approaching.

All the victories of the so-called bourgeois parties were fruitless, not only because they could not prevent the numerical increase in the growing mass of Marxist votes, even when the bourgeois parties triumphed at the polls, but mainly because they themselves were already infected with the germs of decay.

Though quite unaware of it, the bourgeois world was infected from within with the deadly virus of Marxist ideas. The fact that they sometimes openly resisted was to be attributed to rivalry between ambitious political leaders rather than to any opposition on principle between adversaries who were determined to fight one another to the bitter end.

During all those years, only one protagonist was fighting with steadfast perseverance. This was the Jew. The Star of David steadily ascended, as the will to national self-preservation declined.

Therefore, it was not a nation filled with the determination to attack which rushed to the battlefields in August 1914, but it was rather the manifestation of the last flickering instinct of national self-preservation in the face of the progress of the paralysis with which the pacifist and Marxist doctrine threatened our people. Even in those days when the fate of the nation hung in the balance, the internal enemy was not recognised and therefore all efforts to resist the external enemy were bound to be in vain.

Providence did not grant the reward to the victorious sword, but followed the eternal law of retributive justice. A profound recognition of all this was the source of those principles and tendencies which inspire our new Movement. We were convinced that only by recognising such truths could we stop the national decline in Germany and lay a granite foundation on which the State could again be built up, a State which would not be a piece of mechanism
alien to our people, constituted for economic needs and interests, but an organism created from the soul of the people themselves.



________ ________

That ends the chapter by — whom?

Mr. Adolf Hitler. Great White man. German man.

Adolf Hitler, the great.

Adolf Hitler, the great.

What did he give us in that one chapter? Recognition of Nature, wisdom on race, vital history, the origin of culture, what the jew race does and why, the cause of fallen White empires, the reality of the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion, injustice at work, how the jews take control of government and the press, the correctly predicted purpose of Israel, the only path to world peace, and more.

This chapter, “Nation and Race,” is from Adolf Hitler’s worldwide bestselling book Mein Kampf — which means “My Struggle.” In English, we previously had two or three popular versions, all of them shorter and less well translated from the original German. The chapter above is from the rather-newly available “Stalag edition” of the book. (Update, 26 Aug. 2016: I have finished reading this edition.) I find it by far the best. It offers more history, more extensive info on jews, and more detailed explanations on Adolf Hitler’s sources and conclusions.

Mein-Kampf.stalag-editionTranslated by a trusted member of the NSDAP, this “Stalag edition” was distributed by Adolf Hitler’s government to various places including the stalags — prisoner of war camps, thus its name. It was made available to U.S. and Brit prisoners, among others.

  • I got it free as a pdf, here (this link immediately opens the pdf for you).

What is one of the greatest, essential, vital things we see in the chapter above, and in other parts of the book? Adolf Hitler’s description of the step-by-step process of what jews do to a great White country and White population is a description of what has been done to our USA. What the jews did to Germany before and after World War One is what the jews have done here — only bigger, broader, with more than only Negroes used as tools against us, and now with the highest technology we Whites have invented also used against us.


What’s the difference between the Germany that Adolf Hitler fixed and our USA now?

Germany was much smaller. The vast majority of the population was Germans (Whites), while jews and Negroes were small minorities, with an insignificant smattering of others. In contrast, the USA is huge, we Whites are barely a majority of the population (if we believe the media reports), jews are a huge minority, and nearly the entire population of Whites has been raised and mind-poisoned by the jewtube (tv).

Adolf Hitler was able to peacefully gain control of his country through the political, electoral process. That is not an option for us because jews thoroughly control the top political parties — the only parties who get sufficient funding, and get sufficient exposure on tv and other mass media. Keep in mind that jews control the money system and all big media and most small media in the country.

The jews have murdered White leaders who showed the ability to threaten jew power. Let me give you two names of the many: Huey Long and George Patton. I have written about both of them (linked on their names). Also, I have a long list — yet only a partial list — of jew assassins and their White victims in my book White Honor, which is free to read right here and only here on this website.

Thomas Jefferson said that we needed to keep and bear arms for use against the government when it becomes an enemy of us White people. He said he expected our use of arms against the government to be necessary perhaps as often as every generation. And it was necessary generation after generation, as proved by the very existence of the events we call the Civil War, WW1, WW2, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, 9/11, and the current little wars killing anybody but jews.

The jews are killing our race right here in the USA and using our duped young men and women in the Military Machine to kill others around the world.

Obviously, killing works.

We must retaliate by killing them. All races should join us, but the other races lack the intelligence and bravery to do it. Maybe, just maybe, they will follow our example. But only we, the former and future great White race, can make it happen.

Adolf Hitler’s worst flaw was that he did not do what the lying scum jews accuse him of. He did not order the mass killing of jews. He should have. Many jews, but far from all, were put to work, or to otherwise reside, in prison camps. The jews he left alive and free to live in Germany (and Poland, Austria, and France) functioned as an intelligence and sabotage network against him and all Whites. And Germany lost.

We must win. We must kill jews to win.

In our current predicament, we must operate as separate and unconnected individual heroes, or in some cases as pairs or other very small teams.

We must make the progress that our notable forefathers Henry Ford, and William Pierce, and Eustace Mullins, and Revilo Oliver, and others, were too pacifist or afraid to make.

If you are not known among your family or coworkers as a pro-White anti-jew MAN, then keep it that way. It will be far easier for you to operate. Those of us who are known, who are public figures, are watched to some extent and are the jewed-government’s first suspects when a local jew or other invader meets the appropriate early end.

Nonetheless, we all find a way. Where there’s a White will, there’s a way.

  • For advice, see articles linked at the bottom of this website, especially “The Best” and the article it links to, “Guns.”
Whites Will Win

Whites Will Win



Happy Years. Prosperous, inventive, productive. That was Germany, starting in 1933 with Mr. Adolf Hitler’s rise to Germany’s top leadership positions. White families joyful, loyal, employed, and well informed. But their solution was not even close to the “Final Solution,” despite what we’ve been forcefed all of our lives. In the above photo, we see auto manufacturer Ferdinand Porsche, left, showing a model of the car based on the design and desires previously submitted by Adolf Hitler. The result: what we call the Volkswagen Beetle. “Volk” means “Folk” or “People.” “Wagen” means “Wagon,” or “Car.” German is a great language. I encourage all Whites to learn at least a little of it — and open a new window on history and understanding.

Update, 6 Dec. 2016: See the bottom of this article for a combo of great comments by readers plus new info gleaned from an old magazine, all of it related to the origin of the Beetle.

The Volkswagen Beetle

and the Rewriting-Falsification of History, Ongoing, by the jews

WhitesWillWin2014.H.jtl.eAre you a car guy or gal? I am, even though I can’t afford to be, as I am locked out, by jews and igno/fearful Whites from jobs in my two professions, and so I labor in poverty as a big-box wage slave, for now.

Motor Trend, August 2016

Motor Trend, August 2016

Motor Trend magazine is one of several, if not many, car magazines readily available for purchase across our country and in the other originally White countries around the world. Similar magazines include Car and Driver, Automobile, and Hemmings Motor News.

On rare occasion, I respond to the magazines’ hate speech against Germans (I am half German, half Irish, all White) and against Germany, especially the great Germany led by Adolf Hitler.

Previously, my offerings were met with silence, as far as I know. However, my most recent Letter To The Editor seems to have provoked a response.

First, by way of example, let me paste here a copy of an email of mine sent to a gun magazine called Shotgun News, recently renamed Firearms News.


Dear Editor of Shotgun News:

Reading gun magazines, including Shotgun News, gives me education and enjoyment, though I cringe at the frequent hate speech against Germans. The latest and prime example, triggering this email, is in an article by Vin Suprynowicz in the November 2015 issue (V. 69 Issue 32).

He wrote that the German government led by Adolf Hitler from 1933 to 1945 put “a ban on civilian possession” of handguns. But in fact, there was no handgun ban on the German population. There was a ban on the jew population. Why? Because jews were known as acting in favor of their own race and against all other races. (If you want to deny that jews are a race, then you ought to inform the jew-only government of Israel that their racial test for Israeli citizenship is somehow wrong.) The travesty of World War One and its result of dismembering Germany and defiling the honest, productive, traditional institutions of White Germany was all the work of jews — the Warburg brothers, Bernard Baruch, and so many others — and the top Germans knew it. Jews deserved to be disarmed, absolutely.

Please note that Serbia, also jew-controlled, has just unveiled a statue in honor of the assassin jew Gavrilo Princip, who helped spark WW1 by killing the White leader Archduke Ferdinand and his wife. Yes, they honor their assassins, not unlike their funeral extravaganza honoring Karl Weiss, the jew assassin of Huey Long here in the USA when Huey Long was making great strides in his run for president to oust the jew Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Surely your veteran article writer Vin Suprynowicz knows these truths but chooses to repeat what we’ll generously call “errors in fact” against Germans and, of course, in favor of jews. Can we also unveil here that Mr. Suprynowicz is a jew? If not, why not?

Speaking of mass murders — mentioned by Mr. Suprynowicz — let us note that Trotsky, Lenin, and Stalin of the Soviet Union were all jews and together they mass-murdered about 100 million nonjews. Trotsky lived in New York City while the jews prepared their “Bolshevik” revolution, and he was directly funded by the jew banker Jacob Schiff.

The facts — the true facts — can be presented on and on, all in proof that we Whites of the USA have been lied to since birth about the good guys and the bad guys. But those vital facts are never offered in the corporate gun magazines.

Gun articles provide excellent educational opportunities about history. The pattern is clear: the jews owning the major gun magazines use those opportunities to repeat their lies.

Will you publish this letter to the editor? Or print misleading bits of it? Or simply shun it? My bet is on the latter.


Jim Laffrey

Now, to Motor Trend

I presented the above email in lieu of a copy of my letter/email to Motor Trend — because I did not keep a copy of the latter. The letter to Motor Trend was similar in style, but shorter, also less accusational, which is because I wanted to give it a better chance of getting published — yeah, fat chance!

That letter was in response to an MT article in a June or July issue. The way the editor or editors decided to respond was the following: Under the title “Nazi Thieves,” there is a brief letter by a Mr. “Heumann” and then a longer response, in italics, by the editor. Laced with lies. Here, I quote it all:

Nazi Thieves

Please advise Angus MacKenzie that Ferdinand Porsche did not design the original VW Beetle. Paul Schilperoord makes that clear in his book “The True Story of the Beetle.” The Nazis stole everything that wasn’t nailed down. That doesn’t mean that their lies should still be given agency.

Joe Heumann, Charleston, Illinois

As best we can tell, we erred in failing to give proper credit to its originator. Josef Ganz, a Jewish engineer and automotive journalist was the first to come up with the design, and he may have even coined the “Deutschen Volkswagen” phrase. Ganz’s influence was, unsurprisingly, suppressed by Hitler and his henchmen.—Ed.


I think the jews owning and operating Motor Trend wanted to give neither a White man nor any truth a drop of ink in their publication. But they desired to respond to what I said, perhaps because others offered some truth, too. So, they invented a supposed letter from a common “Joe,” a “”Human,”” to shill for another jew — Shilperoord — and provide pretext for both paragraphs of lies.

“As best we can tell,” the editor said, not wanting to fully commit to this particular batch of falsities. Notice, please, that their setup letter doesn’t mention Adolf Hitler, the true designer, at all. Instead, the error they responded to is a claim that Porsche designed the car. And then the editor concluded by referring to Adolf Hitler without any first name, and by insulting him, and by labeling as “henchmen” his fellow top Germans.

The jews are in the middle of re-writing Volkswagen history, falsifying it in favor of jews and against Whites, especially against Germans.

Previously, the truth about the car was well known yet not widely published. But the rise of the World Wide Web changed that, with many White sites re-publishing and spreading the truth.

Currently, a simple search of the key words results in a large variety of results from truthful websites, half-truth websites, and lie sites.

Wikipedia — usefully known among us as wiki-jew-pedia because it is owned and operated by jews — is, at this writing, on a stepping stone across the creek from the true side to the jew side. They say the issue is “a subject of dispute.”

Probably the shill Schilperoord book goes all the way to the jew side. I haven’t read it, nor do any of us need to waste our time doing so. The jew New York Times newspaper published an article pushing the Schilperoord book and used a photo of Ganz sitting in a car he purportedly designed — this photo supposedly supporting their position. The car in the photo supports in no way whatsoever their jew-centric contention about the Beetle. Look:

The jew Josef Ganz in an obviously not at all Beetle-esque vehicle.

The jew Josef Ganz in an obviously not at all Beetle-esque vehicle.

We can expect that wiki-jew-pedia will “progress” from their middle position to the full-jew-lie position during the next several years. As the book 1984 showed (though fictionalized), the rewriting of history is an ongoing, step by step process, with the mass of sheeple, with their short attention spans, being none the wiser.

It is typical that the jews accuse others of doing what the jews always do. The letter above by the fake jew “Heumann” says, “The Nazis stole everything that wasn’t nailed down.” That’s what the jews do. Anyone who studies what Germans actually did, domestically and internationally, knows that their honesty and fairness were (and are) superlative. Anyone who studies what jews have done throughout history and up to the current hour knows that lying, deceiving, committing crimes against humanity, infiltrating and destroying, and blaming it all on others, is the M.O. of jewry, at which they reign supreme.

Furthermore, consider this: Only an honest and high-IQ nation can invent and build great things. It takes truthful cooperation to do it, sharing the knowledge, the ideas, and the techniques to produce new methods, machines, and structures of quality and durability. Only White nations (our White race and our race’s subraces) have done so, and the German nation’s performance has been the best of all. Among nonWhites, only the Japanese slice of the Mongoloid race deserve mention in this context and yet only for copying and modifying, not inventing.

Our cousins of Germany, then and now

Then, our White cousins of Germany were the most productively inventive — brilliant — nation on the planet. The proof is in the very long list of inventions and/or patents that the USA, England, and the Soviet Union (all jew-controlled governments) stole from Germany at the end of the jew-contrived war against Germany that was World War 2. (World War 1 was the previous jew-contrived war against Germany, but these facts are far over the heads of the average tv-watcher and magazines-reader. See the WhiteSchool page for books or articles that cover those wars.)

Lists of inventions/patents stolen from the Whites of great Germany:

  • Article on “The Great Patents Heist”.
  • Sorry to say I now see that other sites I knew offering great info, including lists, have died. One of them was I think was another. In some ways, we are making progress on the Internet, but in other ways we are not. This subject is a case of the not.

Now, our White cousins of Germany are producing for their jew masters a very inventive, booming, Europe-leading economy. I can’t help but wonder how ignorant our dear Germans still are. I suppose they are similarly as ignorant as most of our fellow Whites of America.

Many major-media sites (that is to say jew-owned, jew-corporate sites) have articles and stats on Germany’s return to dominance in Europe. Example: This piece from Of course, what those jew sites never say is that the jews took ownership of the companies and control of the government by way of winning WW2, while Whites are still the supreme inventors, engineers, and workers throughout.


Here’s a short list of great Whites who have known the nature of the jew, and I invite you to join us in knowing this truth, or if you already know it I invite you to join us and act upon it. In chronological order through history:

  • Martin Luther, in the 1500s, in Germany, who wrote the book  called The Jews And Their Lies, available for free in pdf form. See the WhiteSchool page or do a search including “” to easily get your own copy.
  • Alfred Owen Crozier, an American who published two books, the first fiction and the second nonfiction, to try to awaken and inform the public about the jews’ ongoing attempt to take control of our country’s entire money-banking system. His second book was published in 1912, and it correctly predicted what would come if the jews succeeded: The Great Depression and other deliberate crimes against humanity. Again, see WhiteSchool or do the search to get your own copy.
  • Henry Ford, the American inventor-automaker, who published his huge series of newspaper articles as a book titled The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem almost 100 years ago. Again, see WhiteSchool  or search to get it. Also, Mr. Ford’s autobiography includes a chapter on jewry.
  • Eustace Mullins, a famous American researcher, writer, and lecturer, wrote several historic books for us during the last 50 years. Standouts: The Biological Jew, The World Order, and his book on the Federal Reserve — “not federal and not a reserve.” Again, see the WhiteSchool page, etc.

The unavoidable conclusion for anyone of sound mind: the jew race is the enemy of humanity. That’s why European author Dumitru Bacu titled his book “The Anti-Humans.” It’s the truth. The jews say the White race is a “cancer” on humanity. As usual, what the jews say against us and the other races is the opposite of the truth.

The solution — I say, The Solution — is clear. See advice at the bottom of this website — to be as safe and effective as possible. As veteran anti-jew JB Campbell has told us: Heroism Required.

If you’re White, I have hope in you. If you’re White, you have the IQ. If you’re White, there’s a hero in you.

We Whites Will Win.

Update, 6 Dec. 2016: a combo of comments and new info from an old magazine.

[First of two comments:]

Ah, what a pleasure to find and read this article. The Yids’ falsifying of history is a vital point well made. I’d like to add to it. I read car magazines, too, and just this morning was reading a Hagerty magazine, issue Summer 2016, in which there is a feature about the longevity of the Beetle, which they call the Volkswagen Type 1.

The first paragraph of the article is the part of interest. It says the car’s story begins with “Ferdinand Porsche’s NSU Type 32 design, which itself was derived from Hans Ledwinka’s plan for the Tatra V570.”

So, the Hagerty Jew version of history, this month, is to leave out Adolf Hitler completely and to minimize Porsche by giving credit to a “Hans Ledwinka’s plan” — a mere “plan.”

I haven’t searched Ledwinka, but who wants to bet against him being a Jew? No takers, I predict!

Mr. wwwjames, it looks like you are doing a great service 4 Our Volk. Heil2U!


[Second of two comments:]

Heil 4ourVolk, and to you, James.

Speaking of Hans Ledwinka, I have in my hand the 8 Aug. 2016 issue of Autoweek magazine. In it is a column by jew Jay Leno, yep the tv show host and comedian.

Leno writes about an auto guy named Ken Austin, and then he says:
“Austin reminds me of Hans Ledwinka, who engineered the air-cooled, streamlined, independent-suspension Tatra in Czechoslovakia.” And there’s a little more but not important.

Leno did not mention VW nor Germany or anybody else. So, it was simply a plant of the surely-jew Ledwinka. Jew wikipedia’s entry on Ledwinka comes from all jew sources no doubt inflating his contribution to auto history. It all smells jewy to me.

Just wanted to add my Mark’s worth.



OK, the above are the two comments.

Now, I would like to add a couple of excerpts from one of the Hemmings group of car magazines, this one being “SIA” (Special Interest Autos), issue April 2004.

On page 22, in an article by Jim Donnelly, we find a bio on Hans Ledwinka. For our purposes here, the meat of the article is in the final two paragraphs. Below, the words in brackets are mine, and I have underlined the most important parts. I quote:

“Ledwinka’s seemingly unstoppable rise as a design pioneer was abruptly derailed in 1938, when Germany, after Great Britain and France buckled under Adolf Hitler’s threat of war, annexed the Sudetenland, a German-speaking portion of Czechoslovakia that included Koprivnice [where Ledwinka was then working at the Tatra company]. The Germans immediately confiscated Tatra’s patents and forbade the cars’ production, since they were direct competition to the Volkswagen designed by Dr. Ferdinand Porsche under Nazi sponsorship. …” [Specifically, according to the article, "the car" was a small one born in 1936 with an air-cooled V-8 in the back.]

“… But for Hitler’s vicious aspirations, Ledwinka could have been the true father of the people’s car.” [The article ends there.]

So, what do we see there? We see it admitted that Ledwinka was NOT the father of the VW Beetle. Also, we see that the chronology does not favor the jews lies. And we see that the writer, Donnelly, said that what Tatra and Ledwinka were working on was in “direct competition” with what VW and Porsche already had. Furthermore, what Porsche had was “under Nazi sponsorship,” which I see as a way to say a half-truth that avoids saying that the design originated from Adolf Hitler, the so-called top Nazi himself. See below for an important morsel about the term “Nazi.”


In the same SIA magazine from 2004, on page 39, is a noteworthy video review among a group of media reviews — again by Jim Donnelly.

He wrote about a film/video titled VW Beetle — The People’s Car, published by Shoreline Media Group and priced at $20.99. No writer nor director name is given. In the third of three paragraphs in the review, we find the following sentence:

“The story of the Beetle is one of the best known in the old-car hobby, from its earliest gestation under Dr. Ferdinand Porsche as the KdF-Wagen, the prefix an abbreviation for ‘Strength through Joy,’ after the Nazi propaganda apparatus that was backing the project. …”

So, again, we find it simply stated that the Volkswagen/Beetle was a German creation in Germany during the leadership of Adolf Hitler. And we know why the jew-invented insult term “Nazi” was applied while refusing to give due credit to Mr. Adolf Hitler.





The so-called “federal” income tax is theft, plain and simple. State income tax is a different subject, which I am not addressing here.

In 1913, the same year the jews got their private corporation The Federal Reserve enacted by Congress and signed by Pres. Woodrow Wilson, the jews also got an income tax signed into law.

jew-bankers-rabbis.1913 irs.jewThe income tax was a tax on BUSINESS income, not personal labor income. Subsequent rulings by the Supreme Court made that clear. But the jew-IRS makes the “federal” income tax sound mandatory on our personal labor income, and they enforce their crime at the point of government guns, as we all know. (The late great White investigator and writer Eustace Mullins, and others, wrote and documented all of this in previous decades.)

By the way, there is nothing “federal” about it. The jews overthrew our truly federal government in 1787-1789 and reversed the meaning of the word “federal.” The original USA under the Articles Of ConFEDERAtion was a federal government, as the states were still individually sovereign. But the jews (Hamilton, Madison, Morris, et al) who foisted the CONstitution on the country labeled the true American federalists (Patrick Henry, for example) as “anti-federalists”! Indeed, it was a con of monstrous proportions. The whole story is in this article on this website.

Today, if you’re still forced to be a wage slave — as I am at this point in the struggle — be sure to have the least amount of tax automatically taken out of your pay, and then don’t file a tax return unless it seems worth it for the amount you will GET BACK. If you’re not getting anything back, don’t file.

I filed because I was going to get $500 back plus the Earned Income Credit, all told about a thousand bucks. Worth it, to me. But a month later, when an envelope arrived from the U.S. Treasury, it contained not a check but a letter informing me that no money would be returned to me but instead would all go toward “a debt you owe.” That debt would be the sum of student loans that I didn’t “pay back” and never will. There’s a story there.

When I was in Hawaii for two years getting my master’s degree in teaching English as a second or foreign language (2003-5, before my awakening to the Reality Of Race and to jewry), I filed for bankruptcy. The main thing was to get rid of credit-card debt and screw the banks — a laudable idea even before I knew who was in control of theft by banking.

My lawyer, who I hired at the flat fee of $500, told me why student loans had been removed from bankruptcy eligibility. Medical students had made a huge habit of going into med school with the intention of racking up loan debts, graduating from med school, and then filing bankruptcy to wipe away that huge debt. Abuse of the system of bankruptcy, obviously. It got so obvious and so big that “something” had to be done about it. Rather than punish the abusers only, the government punished everybody (in theory). Now, can you guess what race made up the bulk of the abusers?

Of course, jews.

Reason enough

Is theft by “federal” income tax enough reason to kill the jews infesting our “federal” government? Yes, it is. Theirs is a deliberate and ongoing effort to impoverish us and keep us in poverty — and then some. That is a crime against humanity and deserving of the death penalty.

“And then some,” I said. The “federal” income tax is only one small part of the monstrous agenda by jews to impoverish us, dispossess us (take our assets and prevent us from being the owners or controllers of anything significant), and ultimately genocide our race. Yes, White genocide is the top goal of the racial goals of the jews.

Why do you think they give “amnesty” to the nonWhite invaders (wrongly called “immigrants”) by the millions? And why does the government continue to invite more invaders? And why do you think the government gives the invaders free housing, food-purchase cards, cell phones, and other help paid for by us? And why do they insist “we’re all equal”? If we were all equal, the mudskins would have made their own successful countries, they wouldn’t need us to give give give to them. If we were all equal, we should at least be getting our equal share of all that welfare, eh?

Try applying for a share of that welfare. I did that last year. Believe it or not, I actually was homeless and penniless. And what I saw was invaders and africans getting priority from the system while I got led to do the reams of paperwork, got the runaround and, in the end, got nothing.

“Diversity” is a code word for White genocide.

“Anti-racist” is a code word for Anti-White.

Those two lines above are part of the simple and true efforts of Bob Whitaker and his “B.U.G.S.” group. A link to that group is on the first of the TruthfulSites pages on this website. One problem with that BUGS stuff is their banning of the ultimate truth. Believe it or not, they don’t want to mention jews.

We certainly have to identify the enemy. And then we have to kill the enemy.

Yes, we disagree with “our” government on who the enemy is. The government says various groups of Arabs (a race term) and/or Muslims (a religious term) are the main enemy and that we must kill them. That’s because Arabs and Muslims are especially prevalent near Israel, the jews-only country established illegally in 1948 after a hundred years of jew murders and other terror inflicted on the natives there.


Oh, and the government says “homegrown terrorists” are the enemy, too. Who do they mean? Yep, us.

So, kill or be killed.

As the admirable JB Campbell has said, Heroism is Required.

If you’re White, there’s a hero in you.

  • Be safe and effective: See advice in articles linked at the bottom of this site.