The Other Half Of JFK

Famous JFK Half-Quotes Are Half-Truths. Deliberate Half-Truths Are Lies.

President John F. Kennedy and wife Jackie just moments before JFK was shot in the throat and the head in Dallas, Texas, November 22, 1963.

Maybe Well-Intentioned, Many People Cherry-Pick Quotes, Leave Out Pits.

Foreword: The president of the United States was murdered on November 22, 1963. The directors and the multiple shooters of that assassination of John F. Kennedy were never brought to justice. Every president since then has helped the treasonous cover-up. These facts alone should stir real Americans to unite and perform a complete sweep of our infested government. When we add the more recent crimes committed by the same infestation: 9/11, self-destructive wars, and the bankers’ national robbery of us — to name only three — there’s just no excuse for our people’s inaction. We must Defend Ourselves.

We all want to hold onto somebody as a hero or as an admirable person, a model of the kind of people we need now. Many people look back to President John F. Kennedy as the last good president.

Well, my purpose today is not to argue for or against. My purpose is to put the fruit that fell from his mouth back together again, pits and all. The evidence will speak for itself, conclusively.

Two quotes in particular are of special interest to me and, I hope, to all Americans who want the full truth.

  1. The most famous quote is from the “secret societies” speech (full transcript below).
  2. And the other is about Adolf Hitler.

Let’s take the short one first.

JFK’s cherry and pit on Hitler

Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin: jew partners in crimes against White humanity. Yes, against White humanity. Think about it. The strongest of our White race was in Germany. Those three leaders sent Whites to kill Whites, that is, Whites to kill each other. The Japanese were secondary, but jews enjoyed mass-murdering the Japanese, too, especially by dropping totally unnecessary atomic bombs on two civilian populations.

I haven’t read JFK’s diaries nor have I read a book containing his diary entries, but apparently the Institute for Historical Research has. In that publication’s article linked here, JFK is described as having taken a trip to Germany in 1945, soon after World War 2 ended there. JFK was 28 years old, and Germany lay destroyed by the Allies. The “Allies” were Russia, the United States of America, and England, to name the biggies. (Yes, Joseph Stalin’s jew-controlled Soviet Russia and the USA were allies against Hitler’s White Germany. Doesn’t that provide a giant clue to who the one honest leader was?)

In Germany, Kennedy toured various locations, including Hitler’s residence.

I highly recommend the article linked above. I’m fighting the temptation to write about other details in the article. I’ll stick to the main point.

Adolf Hitler, hosting the Olympics in 1936 while FDR and his jew-brother bankers kept the USA suffering in economic Depression.

Admirable web-writers who have overcome criminal-jewry’s monumental lies about Adolf Hitler have quoted Kennedy’s diary entry in regard to Hitler. Here’s the quote some of them have used:

“[W]ithin a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived.”

And some quoters include a bit more:

“He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”

Well, that’s nice. But it’s not the whole quote. As rendered by the Institute for Historical Research, the full quote is this:

“After visiting these places, you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived.

He had boundless ambition for his country which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”

You see the difference. JFK said Hitler’s ambition “rendered him a menace to the peace of the world.” That is wrong. Anyone who has read enough of World War 2 history, including the mass of material written and spoken by Hitler himself and translated into English, knows that Hitler was not the menace to peace. FDR, Churchill, and Stalin wanted the war and conspired to make it happen, using Poland as an excuse. One would think that Kennedy knew better than that ignorant quote.

According to jewry, Chamberlain (left) “appeased” Hitler (center) at this meeting in Munich, Germany, in 1938. Vital knowledge to keep in mind is this: International jewry had declared war on Germany and all Germans in 1933, and WW2 started in 1939. So, who really started WW2 and when?

JFK’s father had been an international player with top jews not only in the liquor business but as ambassador to England. England’s prime minister prior to the heinous Winston Churchill was Neville Chamberlain, who knew Hitler was not a menace to the peace of the world. Jews charged Chamberlain with “appeasing” Hitler and forced Chamberlain out. From the jew point of view, there was a danger of real peace breaking out with Hitler and Chamberlain in charge.

The jew version of “peace” is jews controlling everything and the rest of us being their “peaceful,” oppressed workers, at best.

JFK, knowing his place as a man being groomed for high office, surely wrote his diary with the future in mind. Of course, if I’m wrong, then JFK didn’t actually write the “menace” phrase, and it was added later by the controllers of published history for public consumption.

Hitler was the last honest and admirable leader of a major country in modern history. Criminal jewry reversed that truth. The full Kennedy quote follows the jew agenda.

JFK’s ‘Secret Societies’ and the missing pit

Why not say “Communists,” Mr. President? And sir, why not say “Communists are jews”? Were you a coward or complicit?

A much more popular quote by JFK is from his speech about secret societies and related matters. Kennedy’s title for the speech was actually “The President and the Press.” We can do a search on google or yahoo or whatever and find many published excerpts and published videos that include the actual sound recording of that speech.

The problem, of course, is that in their zeal to promote JFK as good or to promote the truth that secret groups exist, the quoters use only the part they like. And then there are the copycats who simply re-publish the quotes without even trying to check the original.

JFK surely made some good and true statements about our domestic enemies who swear secret oaths and have conspired to undermine and overthrow the main culture of the Founding Fathers and subsequent Americans who grew this country to greatness.

Lying Baines Johnson

But President Lyndon Baines Johnson said some great things, too, didn’t he? And President Richard Nixon said some great things, too, right? And Ford — well, no, not Ford. Presidents Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama have said some great things, too, haven’t they? Mixed with the great, they also said some truth about their treasonous intentions. And then the actions of all of those presidents proved their treasonous intentions.

Eight Is Enough. After LBJ & cabal’s crimes of obstruction and cover-up in the investigation of the JFK assassination, these eight have continued the obstruction of justice.

Well, JFK’s speech about secret societies likewise proved his intentions. The other side, the dark side, the truth he spoke that day, couched between passages of humor and lip-service to our “free and open society,” was a call to increase government secrecy for “national security.”

The key sentence is this one:

“I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.”

And Kennedy went into striking detail about it. Please read the two-faced speech of 27 April 1961 for yourself in the full transcript below. Or listen to the full speech at this jfklibrary link. After the transcript, I’ll have some critical and closing remarks.

The transcript was originally found at this link. I made slight corrections. A full transcript is also at the above jfklibrary link.


“Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:

I appreciate very much your generous invitation to be here tonight.

You bear heavy responsibilities these days, and an article I read some time ago reminded me of how particularly heavily the burdens of present day events bear upon your profession.

You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx.

We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and managing editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the “lousiest petty bourgeois cheating.”

But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath to the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the Cold War.

If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper man.

I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight “The President and the Press.” Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded “The President Versus the Press.” But those are not my sentiments tonight.

It is true, however, that when a well-known diplomat from another country demanded recently that our State Department repudiate certain newspaper attacks on his colleague it was unnecessary for us to reply that this Administration was not responsible for the press, for the press had already made it clear that it was not responsible for this Administration.

Nevertheless, my purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one party press. On the contrary, in recent months I have rarely heard any complaints about political bias in the press except from a few Republicans. Nor is it my purpose tonight to discuss or defend the televising of Presidential press conferences. I think it is highly beneficial to have some 20,000,000 Americans regularly sit in on these conferences to observe, if I may say so, the incisive, the intelligent and the courteous qualities displayed by your Washington correspondents.

Nor, finally, are these remarks intended to examine the proper degree of privacy which the press should allow to any President and his family.

If in the last few months your White House reporters and photographers have been attending church services with regularity, that has surely done them no harm.

On the other hand, I realize that your staff and wire service photographers may be complaining that they do not enjoy the same green privileges at the local golf courses that they once did.

It is true that my predecessor did not object as I do to pictures of one’s golfing skill in action. But neither on the other hand did he ever bean a Secret Service man.

My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors.

I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future — for reducing this threat or living with it — there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security — a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.

This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President — two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.


The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my con trol. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In times of “clear and present danger,” the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.

Today no war has been declared — and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions — by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence — on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security — and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.

On many earlier occasions, I have said — and your newspapers have constantly said — that these are times that appeal to every citizen’s sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.

I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.

Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: “Is it news?” All I suggest is that you add the question: “Is it in the interest of national security?” And I hope that every group in America — unions and businessmen and public officials at every level — will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to this same exacting test.

And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.

Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.


It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation — an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people — to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well — the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers — I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: “An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed — and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment — the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution — not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants” — but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news — for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security — and we intend to do it.


It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder, and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world’s efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press — to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news — that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help, man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”


Marx and Meat

Karl Marx, jew, son of a rabbi. A rabbi is a teacher of the jew racial rules book called the Talmud. It is not religion. Read a little of the Talmud and quickly see for yourself.

JFK started the speech by repeating jewry’s tale of Karl Marx’s beginnings, thus making that heinous jew a sympathetic character. Why would Kennedy do such a thing? Most people, being ignorant about history, will take JFK’s statements as truth, as if Marx could have been caressed into being an honest assimilated jew instead of an enemy. But for those of us who know, this kind of presidential propaganda is sickening. However, it’s likely that Kennedy brought up Marx to suggest, without saying the word “Communism,” that Communism is that “secret society.”

Kennedy had to have known that jews created Communism to dupe and undermine, foremost, the Eur-Asians of Russia and China. For us, jews created Capitalism to undermine our republic of free Commerce for all, as the Constitution stipulates. Look them up: Both Communism and Capitalism were created in the 1800s by the jews Karl Marx and his jew comrades. However, JFK let his audience imagine that he was talking about Communism, and in the USA, the general public did not know that Communism=Jews. Thus, jews were being protected by JFK’s speech, and he surely knew what he was doing.

Now, as we turn to the meat of JFK’s speech, I want to say that surely there was no need to increase government operative secrecy.

FDR. Even the chair was kept secret by the jew-owned media during his treasonous four-term reign.

Crypto-jew President Franklin Roosevelt (and link here) had established plenty of secrecy in his treasonous, four-term reign. Crypto-jew President Harry “S” Truman came next and signed the establishment of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a secretive governmental crime operation. Crypto-jew President Dwight David Eisenhower presided over a massive increase in the entire Military Industrial Intelligence Complex, and then he had the audacity to issue his famous “warning” that the Military Industrial Complex could become a threat to our Constitutional republic. Before becoming president, Eisenhower, as general “Ike” (a common jew nickname), had presided over the mass starvation-murders of a million German prisoners. That’s a crime against humanity. Eisenhower should have been hung at Nuremberg, not honest Hitler’s loyal men.

And then Eisenhower presided over the cover-up, the confiscation of documents all over Europe, and the storing of them out of sight of the American people to this day. Jewry rewarded him with two terms in the White House.

JFK followed Eisenhower. JFK needed more governmental secrecy? Absurd.

Now, in JFK’s defense, we can say that the fact of his being murdered — by multiple shooters not Lee Harvey Oswald — seems to be proof that Kennedy was not a jew and that Kennedy attempted to do some good along with the bad. Jewry murdered him for it. What did he attempt? Various historians and investigative writers cite one or both of the following:

  1. JFK’s Executive Order on printing money independent of the jews’ Federal Reserve Bank system.
  2. JFK’s opposition to Israel becoming a nuclear-weapons power.

But if JFK was a true American, we have to ask why he didn’t tell the American people the full truth about jewry’s control of those secret societies. Why didn’t he tell the full truth about jewry’s control of media, Hollywood, Las Vegas, education policy, the medical system, the legal system, and whatever else he knew? If he had told the people, the people would have had a chance to rise up against the enemy network and to protect the “Profile In Courage” president. But JFK had no such courage.

JFK parties with Frank Sinatra (left) and Peter Lawford. Sinatra and Lawford lived charmed lives in jew-controlled entertainment, including jew-mob’s Las Vegas, and both chose jew-founded Cedars-Sinai Hospital in which to die. They were crypto-jews, which means secret jews. “Italian Jews” are jews. The jew Albert Einstein and many rabbis have openly said that jews are loyal only to jewry, never to the country they are living in. Thus, jews are jews, not “Italian jews,” not “German jews,” not “American jews,” etc.

Kennedy didn’t even say the word “jew.” Let me explain further about the perception of Communism at that time. When Kennedy made that speech, the public had already been fed mass doses of “Communism from the Soviet Union is the enemy.” It was only a few years earlier that Senator Joseph McCarthy had conducted his very public effort against “Communists” in the government, Hollywood, and elsewhere in our country. McCarthy chose to use the word “Communists” rather than “jews,” which would have been the exactly accurate name for the Enemy.

The late great American historian Eustace Mullins wrote that he, Mullins, had informed McCarthy of the jews of Communism, but McCarthy chose the “safer” term. And what good did “safer” do him? He was still railroaded, tarred, and feathered by the jew-owned media and the jew-controlled government — with crypto-jew Eisenhower as president.

The lower-level dupes in the press (I used to be one of those, in my former ignorance, working for the former Nashville Banner daily newspaper) and the small segment of the public who might have heard or read JFK’s words would have thought “Communists” and not “jews.” Kennedy knew it. Here comes the nail in the coffin. Kennedy said:

“For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage;”

That is a direct reference to what Soviet leaders had said. It is not meant as a reference to jews. (Jews in the USA had already owned, for example, the New York Times for six decades and had no need for the theft, bribery, nor espionage.) Other statements could be culled from JFK’s speech to further prove my point.

Thus, we can discard this speech as part of what got JFK in trouble with criminal-jewry. The speech was to keep Communism as the boogeyman (thus keeping attention off jewry in the U.S.), and to increase secrecy, thus further enabling criminal jewry. Also, the speech was cover for the jew media (ABC, NBC, CBS, New York Times, Washington Post, Time magazine, etc.) to continue withholding the truth from us.

Why then did jewry murder JFK? We have only his supposed interfering with jewry’s control of our money and his reported interfering in illegal-Israel’s affairs in regard to nuclear weapons.


Revilo P. Oliver, professor, true patriot, and scholar of classical languages including the original languages of the jew “Christian” Bible.

The late great Revilo P. Oliver, writing in the truly patriotic Liberty Bell magazine of the 1970s-1990s, tackled this subject. His amazing article is titled “Killing Kennedy.” (Link to the article only, opens as a pdf file. However, in that pdf, the footnotes are confusingly disorganized and repeated. Link to the entire issue of the October 1992 Liberty Bell, highly recommended, opens as a pdf.)

In this article, Oliver refers to a previous article he had published, which had stirred readers to request that he write more on the assassination. Why is Prof. Oliver an authoritative source? Number One: Oliver was not a jew. Also, Oliver worked for Intelligence during World War 2, before Oliver realized that our government is not ours and is jew infested. Oliver maintained patriotic sources of information. Furthermore, he was a scholar of history in a very deep sense. Thus, readers were correct in clamoring for Oliver to write more on the assassination of JFK.

Referring to his previous article, Oliver wrote:

In my article I indicated the major motive for the assassination of Kennedy: the need to abort the growing dissatisfaction of the American people with a government that was obviously acting in the interests of our enemies, the masters of Communist Russia—a dissatisfaction that had been brought close to the boiling point by the Indignation Meetings held throughout the country, which were sponsored by patriotic Americans in Dallas.
This purpose was achieved and the pro-American movement liquidated by the assassination, followed by a spectacular funeral for which the Army detachment had been diligently rehearsed in advance and at which Jacqueline Kennedy gave a brilliant performance. A well-contrived deluge of wildly irrational bathos in the press and over television sufficed to reduce the majority of Americans to the status of savages who beat their breasts and howl when their big chief dies.

Oliver was not one to withhold his sarcasm for the enemy and for the seemingly willfully ignorant sheeple.

Later in the article, Oliver gets to the subject of the famous Executive Order 11110. More than that, though, Oliver tells us about JFK’s supposed popularity, which is information the jew media never tell us about their myth of “Camelot,” do they?

Now Executive Order No. 11110 is indexed in the Federal Register as pertaining to treasury notes and silver certificates, and the reported tenor of it was quite plausible. It was even possible, though unlikely, that the amount mentioned had been printed, although not put into circulation. The report therefore was not invalidated by a
mistake about Kennedy’s intent and about the effect of Lincoln’s issue of ‘greenbacks.’

It must be remembered that in the autumn of 1963, Kennedy’s popularity had been greatly impaired and he could not have been reelected in 1964 without some heroic effort to regain the favor he had lost. (See the appendix below). It would have been reasonable for him to try some spectacular manoeuvre that would be commended by many of the intelligent Americans whom his conduct in office had alienated and angered—especially a manoeuvre that seemed to avert national bankruptcy and to limit the looting of the country by the Federal Reserve. His administration, furthermore, was riddled by fighting for power within it, and such an order, even if never carried out, would have sufficed to intimidate some factions.

There appeared to be a real rift within the organization of our rulers (as distinct from dissent simulated to entertain the populace). A correspondent kindly informs me that he clearly remembers that, not long before Kennedy was expunged, Eisenhower appeared on television irately to denounce Kennedy for plans to tamper with the sacrosanct Federal Reserve, going so far as to regret that he had not campaigned for Nixon and thus assured his election in place of Kennedy. Since I almost never watch the Jews’ picture-shows, I did not see that program. I do have vague recollections of very adverse criticism of Kennedy by the Super-Sheeny, Avraham ben Elazar, alias Dr. Henry Kissinger, who was probably the Jewish satrap in charge of supervising the government in Washington. This seemed to indicate an internal struggle among our rulers, possibly a struggle between two factions of the ruling race.

They are all jews, folks. From the open jews such as Benjamin Shalom Bernanke of the Federal Reserve (top left), to crypto-jews such as Timothy Geithner of the U.S. Treasury (top right).

As you can see, the Oliver article is a must-read. I have excerpted only a tiny portion of it. Continue reading it to learn about Abraham Lincoln, the Federal Reserve, and Oliver’s assertion that JFK’s action on money would simply be “a new ‘greenback’ swindle.” Kennedy’s Secretary of the U.S. Treasury was C. Douglas Dillon, of course a jew.

In a footnote, Oliver completes his overturning of what we have been “taught” about Executive Order 11110:

And so, needless to say, it was not revoked by Johnson after the assassination made him President. Kennedy’s last Executive Order 11127, 9 November 1963, concerned a strike on the Florida East Coast Railway. Johnson’s first orders were 11128, giving Federal employees a holiday on Monday, 25 November; 11129, extolling Kennedy and renaming the Atlantic Missile Range in his honor; and 11130, appointing the Warren Commission.

Israel’s Nuclear Weapons

The only subject left is the question of whether JFK went against jewry by standing in the way of Israel becoming a nuclear-weapons power.

At this point, in light of all of the above information, it is nearly impossible to believe such a story. However, what if JFK did, temporarily, block Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons? What if JFK did block Israel from finishing the nuclear-weapons production facility widely reported as being started in the late 1950s underground at Dimona? We have no need for that as an additional reason for jewry to kill him. But if true, it would fit with jewry’s historic behavior, though it would not fit JFK’s. By the way, how about that Dimona being started during the 1950s? Started during jew Eisenhower’s presidency, and not a peep from “Ike” about it. That is because Ike was a jew.


The above evidence is surely enough damning evidence about JFK, and yet I have more, which I intend to include in a shorter article to follow this one. (Update, 9 Dec. 2012: Part 2 is here.) For now, let us conclude this article with the following  points.

On the left is Vladimir Lenin, a crypto-jew infamous mass-murderer of White Russians. On the right is son-of-a-rabbi Michael Chertoff, open jew. In the wake of 9/11, Chertoff was the head of the criminal division of the U.S. Dept. of Justice (department of cover-up), and in 2005 was made head of the Dept. of Homeland Security by traitor president G. W. Bush. Lenin and Chertoff model two of the most famous jew physical features: nose shape and skull shape.

Communism has been replaced by Terrorism as the boogeyman keeping attention off jewry, which most people don’t realize. (Terrorism is another jew orchestration. Look at 9/11: Jews controlled every agency and company directly involved, from Larry Silverstein to Michael Chertoff.) Likewise, most people don’t know that Communism = Jewry. Marx and Engels, who JFK mentioned, were jews.

In regard to the “secret societies” partial quote by JFK that has been widely repeated on the Internet, it is fair to think that most people believe Kennedy — especially when they hear a clip of the recording of the speech — right?

So, what’s keeping our people from a proper reaction to JFK’s message and warning? I have Questions for my fellow Americans.

  • Which part of “secret society” do our fellow Americans not understand?
  • Which part of “a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” do our fellow Americans not understand?
  • Which part of “..military, government, education …” do our fellow Americans not understand?

JFK didn’t say “jews” because he was deliberately protecting them. Otherwise, he was correct. The secret society is monolithic: “mono” means one. It is one ruthless conspiracy around the world. And just as “monotheism” means one god, “monolithic” means one entity. That entity is the jew race.

The species is “homo sapiens sapiens,” which we call modern humans. The sub-species are called “races.” Blacks, Arabs, and Whites are races. Arabs and Whites are closely related while Blacks are the most distant genetically and in average IQ. Scientific facts. Jews are a race, most of whom pretend to be Whites. Above, Barack Obama Sr., the late Muammar Gaddafi of Libya, and James Laffrey. Three races somewhat different physically, chemically, and mentally. See the Rushton link for proof of that. We have been mis-led to be ignorant of the importance and the reality of Race.

(For readers who see the word “race” and go woozy, read this one recent article as a pdf file by the late J. Philippe Rushton, professor of evolutionary psychology. The reality of race is proved and plain to see. For that link and much more, see the TopLinks page right here on www!)

For Americans who still think that perhaps Muslims are the ultimate enemy, or a group of White men, or other nonjews, consider the following. If jews are not the ultimate enemy, then it would have to be explained how a nonjew power has allowed jews to own the Federal Reserve Bank System, own our media, own Hollywood, flood the top jobs in higher education, flood every president’s administration, and on and on. State your case. Otherwise, get on board, people. Get on board. JFK died in 1963, and he said it was already a worldwide conspiracy throughout governments, military, education, etc. JFK was murdered by them. We’ve spent our entire lives under their network of treason and oppression. Enough already. Enough.

Rise up. Choose the Solution activity that fits your capabilities. Do it. In Self Defense, in defense of our families, in defense of our race, and in defense of our White-founded White-built country. Do it now and untill it’s done. Don’t wait for others to show the way. That’s what too many others are doing already. Step up. Help show the way. They will follow.

Whites Will Win! — again.


James T. Laffrey


Jews For President?

Jews For President?
Barack Obama Is A Jew
The GreenParty’s Stein Is A Jew.
The Republicans’ Romney, Too?

Obama with his two Stanleys. His mother’s nose expressed her jew genes more as she aged. Otherwise, she made an effective crypto-jew, passing as “White.”

President Barack Obama is a jew because his so-called “White” mother was a jew. All of the other noise about Obama — place of birth, Muslim, Communist, whatever — are Distractions so that the People never get a fix on the fact that Stanley was a jew. Yes, his mother’s name was Stanley Ann Dunham.

For her race, Stanley Ann Dunham strategically bred with a Black man in order to produce a Black jew as a tool for jewry. (A Bronfman jew boy of the alcoholic-beverage dynasty did the same, though in a longer-term relationship.) Stanley didn’t even live one year with the Black father. Of course, they had no way to know that the offspring would work out so well, all the way to the White House. Other jews have resided there, but Obama is the first Black jew there. Quite an achievement by jewry. Quite a slap in the face to our dozing White race.

Stanley’s other services to jewry included international work for the CIA and for the “micro-loan” scam of jew bankers in the Third World (countries of dark-browns and blacks who lack the intelligence and work ethic to build a modern civilization of their own).

Jewess Jill Stein (center) carries a big prop flag and whatever else to help herself get recognized and arrested while supposedly trying to get into the presidential debate venue. It’s all jew theater, folks.

The Green Party has themselves an open jew for their presidential candidate: Jill Stein. Since jews started strategically breeding with Whites long, long ago, we have people such as Jill Stein whose jewness is not physically obvious. Most of them, the mixed breeds who easily pass as “White,” keep their jewness a secret. “Crypto-jew” is the historical term for secret jews.

The first clearly crypto-jew president of the United States Of America was Franklin Delano Roosevelt. His family tree is full of jew names. Here, we see his was yet another deceitful, name-changing jew family. Many people of FDR’s time knew he was a “Communist” and said so. But they didn’t say, maybe because they didn’t realize, that “Communist” equals jew. Karl Marx, the son of a rabbi (a jew professor of the jew Rule Book called the Talmud), popularized the jews’ creation of Communism, and simultaneously gave birth to another jew creation to pretend to oppose Communism. That creation is “Capitalism.” Nearly  every top leader ever in Communism has been a jew, such as the now-infamous name-changing crypto-jews Trotsky and Lenin.

Non-jew candidates were savagely attacked by the jew media, but they kept FDR’s disability a secret. President Woodrow Wilson had had jew Bernard Baruch as head of the agency controlling funding and distribution of war supplies through World War 1, and the jew stole multi-millions from it. Later, FDR had Baruch on his team of jews infesting the White House.

When you know FDR was a jew, it becomes clear as day why he lied his way into the White House on a platform of “no foreign wars for America.” And it becomes clear why he gave instant recognition to crypto-jew Josef Stalin as the new leader of the Soviet Union. And FDR’s motive for confiscation of gold from individual Americans, but not from jew bankers and jew “collectors,” is clear. Likewise, his years of treason in putting the USA into WW2 before Congress voted for it, as FDR funded and supplied the jew-Communists against the White German nation led by Adolf Hitler. Likewise, FDR’s treason in manipulating Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor so as to provide the pre-planned Terror used to dupe Americans into supporting another war. (9/11 was another one, with its pre-planted explosives for the controlled demolitions of three World Trade Center towers despite only two planes as excuses.) In the 1930s, jews already owned major newspapers, radio networks, and Hollywood. With jew-media support, FDR was “elected” four times. Yes, four terms as president. Even in a wheelchair. Imagine that.

The crypto-jew FDR appointed the crypto-jew Harry S Truman to be vice president, and Harry S (no period on his then-secret jew middle name) had the jew satisfaction of dropping the new atomic bombs on two Japanese cities to mass-murder and maim more non-jews. Of course, jewry had preferred to hit White Germany with the bombs, but thanks to the greatness of White American military leaders, especially General George Patton, the war was over already in Germany. So, despite the fact that Japan had pleaded surrender for months already, jewry had no publicly plausible place but Japan on which to gleefully rain atomic terror, blood, and misery. Also, as FDR would have done, Truman in 1948 instantly recognized the new illegal country called Israel, where jews are still systematically genociding the original Palestinian and Arab inhabitants.

The Liberty Bell magazine is one of the trustworthy sources on famous crypto-jews. The great professor, scholar of history, and pro-White author Revilo P. Oliver wrote of Truman’s jewness repeatedly, such as in this linked, historic issue (opens as a pdf) or here in a separate pdf file of that article.

The great American general George Patton (right) and the crypto-jew “Ike” Eisenhower.

Then came Dwight David Eisenhower. He was a failure as a military man but was leapfrogged into the command position in Europe by jewry for jewry because he was a jew. Not all people with the name “David” are jews, but it’s a clue. Star of David. King David. Mogen David.

Here is his jew ancestry.

Eisenhower presided over the continuing extermination of White Germans after the war was over. The author James Bacque has documented that fact, as have others. (Gen. George Patton awoke at that time, knew we had fought the “wrong enemy,” and opposed jewry’s crimes against humanity. Patton was promptly killed. Link 1. Link 2, a pdf, with facts on pgs. 27-28.) Jewry rewarded their crypto-jew general Eisenhower with two terms in the White House. By the way, Eisenhower was allowed to label the presidential retreat as “Camp David.” This was supposedly to name it after his son, David. But no president has renamed it. No “Camp Amy.” No “Camp Chelsea.” No “Camp Sasha.” Why not? Because “David” is sacred to jewry.

Briefly, so as not to exhaust the reader, let me say that I guess John Kennedy was not a jew (especially because jews murdered him), I strongly suspect Lyndon Johnson was a crypto-jew, I don’t know if Richard Nixon was a jew; I don’t know about Gerald Ford, but he appointed jew Nelson Rockefeller as vice president; I believe James Carter to be a crypto-jew; the Bush family surely are crypto-jews; I suspect Bill Clinton as a crypto-jew, and his wife Hillary surely is; and now we have half-Black crypto-jew Obama in the White House.

All of those presidents, jews or not, filled the Executive Branch of government disproportionately with jews.

Is Romney a jew, too?

Obama and Romney and the jew ritual. (Two photos combined.) Would Thomas Jefferson or George Washington ever commit such an anti-American act? Never. Washington warned, “no foreign entanglements.” Jefferson said other races are incompatible under our government. Ben Franklin said jews, specifically, should be banned. Correct then, and correct now.

Yes, my review of the available evidence tells me that Willard Mitt Romney is a jew.

As with Obama, let us focus on Romney’s mother, who I believe was a crypto-jew. The jew-created and -operated Wikipedia does not give up crypto-jews until they are well outed by others, but the page on Mitt Romney’s mother, Lenore LaFount Romney, offers some clues.

Her father, Harold Arundel LaFount, was appointed by President Calvin Coolidge in 1927 to the new Federal Radio Commission. With the jews developing their monopoly of American media (for example, having bought the New York Times in 1896), radio was part of the scheme. (Even the Wikipedia page on the FRC shows it was a “bad cop” agency to set up crypto-jew President FDR’s “good cop” Federal Communications Commission. That is a great example of the jew modus operandi: Cause the problem and then inflict the deceitful solution, too.) LaFount later became president of the National Independent Broadcasters (note the misuse of the word “Independent”).

Lenore LaFount Romney, in the few years prior to marrying George Romney, was given an open path to stage and screen acting success in New York City (Jew York City) and Hollywood (jew propaganda movie and tv center of the world). She chose marriage. She and her husband hobnobbed with the Roosevelts and other traitor families. George Romney went to the top levels of the automobile industry in Detroit, became governor of Michigan (and among his anti-American actions, he began the income tax in Michigan), and topped out in the cabinet post of Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (to help incompatible non-Whites displace Whites by giving non-Whites housing to repeatedly destroy, and to give other welfare goodies paid for by the productive White majority).

Although supposedly a Mormon, Lenore Romney served on the board of the National Conference of Christians and Jews, and she was that organization’s chairwoman from 1970–1971 and vice chair in 1972.

(By the way, anybody who knows the basics of the origin of Mormonism knows it was an absurd hoax from the get-go. Nobody could get away with such a thing now, with our multi-media communication system on the Internet. That goes for Christianity, too — a jew hoax to undermine the Roman Empire. Who, nowadays, would buy a new story written by a race who declares themselves “the Chosen by God,” and offers a virgin-birth offspring of God who walks on water, rises from the dead, and floats up into the clouds?)

Finally, the jew organization Hadassah — “the Women’s Zionist Organization of America” — honored Lenore Romney, the “Mormon,” in her later years for a lifetime of service to whom? Jewry, of course.

Just as Obama’s jew mother makes her son a jew, so Willard Mitt Romney’s jew mother makes Mitt a jew.

Jews are not Whites

They didn’t have cameras, didn’t have video, so this is a painting of those guys who met in Philadelphia and New York and by race, by blood, by intelligence, and by cooperation gave us the mighty White republic of the United States Of America. Jews, by totally illegal means, stole it, to put it plainly. Now, what are real Americans going to do about it?

Our country was founded by White men: The Founding Fathers of the United States Of America. They knew that members of other races were (and are) incompatible with the honor, honesty, and integrity by which the Founding Fathers intended our country to be built up and maintained. But they didn’t write it into the Constitution, which was a grave mistake, although they did write about counting each Black for statistical purposes as less than one. Now, the ultimate supremacist racist race is partying it up throughout our government, banking, “news” media, music industry, and Hollywood.

Anonymous accuracy

The following is a delight from a yahoo “news” article featuring an Obama-ite spouting that we’re “better off” since Obama was installed by the jews of Wall Street, media, and electronic voting machine manufacturers.

The delight is from a commenter with an avatar photo of Jack Nicholson who wrote:

HERE’S JOHNNY  •  24 secs ago

“I promise that I support traditional marriage-1 man-1 woman.
“I promise 100% transparency in my administration.”
“I promise NO NEW TAXES on a family making less than $250K a year.”
“I will allow 5 days of public comment before I sign any bills.”
“I will remove earmarks from PORK projects before I sign any bill.”
“I will end Income Tax for seniors making less than $50K a year.”
“I will bring our entire troop’s home within ONE year.”
“I’ll put the Health Care negotiations on CSPAN so everyone can see who is at the table!”
“I’ll have no lobbyists in my administration.”
“I’ll close Guantanamo.”
“I’ll resign if I don’t cut the deficit in half by the end of four years.”
“I’ll cut the debt by half in my first term–Obama 2004 and 2008.
“I’ll unite the people of this great country.”

A list like that one can be made for every president since FDR. The two-party charade is played for three main reasons:

  1. so Democrats can get done what would be too difficult or obvious for Republicans to do, and vice-versa.
  2. so the donkey and elephant can relieve each other when even the duped and dozing population cannot stand any more of the incumbent’s lies.
  3. to provide the illusion of a “choice.”

The two-party jew party is a see-saw of deceit.

If jew Jill Stein of the controlled-opposition Green Party were to be “elected,” it would be a three-seat merry-go-round of deceit.

Stop Them

Obama and Romney are jews, which means they are, by definition, traitors. Both of them are advancing jewry’s historical international effort to genocide the White race to ease jewry’s path toward total control of the USA and the world.

That Truth is too big, at present, for most Americans to allow whole into their heads. But the truth does not fear investigation. I invite doubters to investigate, and I suggest avoiding jew sources. Why not, for once, give historians and scholars from other races a hearing?

Jews make disagreeing with them an “anti-Semitic” “hate crime.” (In fact, Arabs are the main population of Semites on Earth. Jews are constantly spewing hate against Arabs and murdering them. Obviously, jews are the ultimate “anti-Semites.”) What other race tries to make it illegal to disagree with them? None. Is that jew attitude an American attitude? No, it is not.

And what does “hate crime” mean? It means, in practice, any unbowing thing a White does toward a non-White, especially toward a jew. Jews and Blacks don’t count anything they do against Whites as a “hate crime.” So, “hate crime,” a term created by jews, really means Anti-White.

The White race created and built this country. Jew traitors (a redundancy) duped Whites into dereliction of duty through jewry’s lies about race, equality, and suicidal guilt. True. Absorb it and get over it.

Whites Will Win! — again.

We are right. But right is not enough.

Be right and fight.


Barack Obama Is A Jew

Barack Obama Is A Jew

Stanley Ann Dunham holds her son, Barack Hussein Obama. The Black father, having been used for strategic breeding only, had no role in raising the little half-Black crypto-jew.

Stanley Ann Dunham holds her son, Barack Hussein Obama. The Black father, having been used for strategic breeding only, had no role in raising the little half-Black crypto-jew.

Originally Posted on 30 January 2012 by JamesLaffrey on the former UnEqualPartyUSA site and then updated for publication here on WhitesWillWin!

An offspring of a jew is a jew. Jews especially like to emphasize the mother’s line — the matrilineal. So, let’s focus on President Barack Obama’s mother.

When looking at secret jews, we must find and weigh evidence.

  • Names and physical features are big clues.
  • Actions and affiliations are also big clues.


Barack Hussein Obama’s mother’s name was Stanley Ann Dunham. “Stanley” is a common jew name. In this case, we have a female named Stanley. Who but a jew would name a female “Stanley” in the USA? Answer: Nobody. A male, female-insulting jew is what her father must have been. That’s what jew males do, by the way, as modeled in their race’s rule book, the Talmud, where females are for breeding and serving males.

Depending on what we want to believe in this information about Stanley Ann’s parents, we likely agree that they were capable people. At least one of them was a jew. Her mother, for example, named Madelyn, was vice president of a bank. Remember: If either of Stanley Ann’s parents was a jew, then she was a jew. Thus, Barack Obama is a jew. That’s enough jewness for automatic acceptance in Israel, and it’s enough for me.

Stanley Ann Dunham, father and furniture man Stanley, with mother and bank vice president Madeline. Selling furniture, which is infamously overpriced at retail, is another common jew occupation.

Stanley Ann Dunham (left), father and furniture man Stanley, with mother and bank vice president Madeline. Selling furniture, which is infamously overpriced at retail, is another common jew occupation.

It is important to note that the above link is to wikipedia, which is owned and operated by jews. They don’t help uncover secret jews. But a careful reading of that wiki article gives plenty of evidence. And then, read the endnotes and look at all those jew names who are credited as the sources of the info in the article. (Sadly, most Americans don’t recognize the common jew names as jewish. It’s ignorance cultivated by jew media and jew-published textbooks.) The wikipedia story of Stanley Ann Dunham, and what’s left out, is a jew construction.

And yet, there’s more from wikipedia. Here, we have a long article on the “Family of Barack Obama.” They admit that a different wife of Obama’s father was a jewess. Also, look at the names in the family tree of Stanley Ann Dunham. Jacob, Harry, Gabriella, Della, Madelyn (“Madeline” on Stanley Ann’s birth certificate. This link also supplies a treasure chest of other info, sometimes conflicting.), Ruth, Lucille, Rolla, Stanley. That’s a thinly veiled jew family.

Jew mother, jew son.

And just so you know: jews are not Whites.

Physical Features

Mother of Obama, Obama, and grandmother of Obama, in 1965.

Mother of Obama, Obama, and grandmother of Obama, in 1965.

When I look at the photo (at top) of Obama’s mother holding little Barry (that’s what they called him), I see a jew woman, a jewess. This profile looks nearly exactly the same as a girlfriend I had in Crossville, Tennessee, though from the front my girlfriend was more attractive. Back then, I was totally ignorant of jews and jewry. But two years ago (2010), when I learned the truth about jews and jewry, I realized I’d had a jew girlfriend. My memory of her and her family’s behavior and businesses confirm that realization. Obama’s mother was a jew. If the mother is a jew, then the son is a jew. It’s as simple as that.

Obama with his two Stanleys.

Obama with his two Stanleys.

For readers who don’t have enough experience in looking at jews and recognizing the more obvious jews, then I suggest starting here. In the last two years, I’ve looked and learned. Recently, I saw a man in a restaurant here in VietNam (where I am living temporarily, teaching English). He was alone and talking with the owner of the restaurant. The owner introduced him to me because she (the owner) thought Americans here would automatically want to talk with each other. I knew by looking that he was a jew. He told me his name is Marty, retired from New York, living in Thailand, visiting VietNam. We had another conversation the next day, by chance meeting, in another restaurant. I asked him if jewness was “an ethnicity or a religion.” He answered: “ethnicity.” For all the disinfo writers on the Internet, and the liars (such as fake-named “Timster” of the “How Dare I” blog), and the sadly ignorant who believe jewness is nothing but a “faith” or “religion,” I urge listening to Marty on this issue. He and I talked for a long time, and I enjoyed the conversation. Of course, I wasn’t taken in. If called by jewry, he surely would act against me, as he surely acted against Whites in his life in the USA. But I believe he sincerely answered “ethnicity.” Jews believe themselves to be a race. In fact, by the Talmud, they believe themselves to be the only humans, and the rest of us are “cattle.”

Obama’s mother, by facial features, is of the race, the self-Chosen, the jews. Thus, Obama is a jew.

Actions and Affiliations

  • Obama, before and since his election, has promised to “rein-in” the jew bankers of Wall Street and Washington DC, but then he “bailed” them out.
  • Obama, before his election, said he would enact single-payer health coverage for all Americans. But jews own the insurance companies and the bulk of the medical system. After election, Obama swiped his single-payer promise off the table.
  • Obama appointed jew after jew after jew into the government. A jew is always at or near his ear, from David Axelrod to Rahm Emanuel and now Jacob “Jack” Lew. And Larry Summers (was president of Harvard, was Sec. of U.S. Treasury), Ben Shalom Bernanke (head of Federal Reserve Bank system board), Timothy Geithner (was head of Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the headquarters, and now Secretary of the U.S. Treasury), Jared Bernstein, Gary Gensler, Mary Schapiro, Douglas Shulman (retained as head of the IRS), Julius Genachowski, Eric Lander, Kenneth Feinberg, Ron Bloom, Alan Bersin, Todd Stern, Cass Sunstein, Ezekiel Emanuel, Peter Orszag, and many more.
Obama, loyal to his "kin" of jewry and Israel, performs a jew ritual. (image source:

Obama, loyal to his “kin” of jewry and Israel, performs a jew ritual. (image source:

Can it be that nonjews are incapable of government administration and giving the best advice? Of course not. We nonjews are 95% of our country. But Obama prefers jews. If you were president, would you appoint mostly jews? It can’t be done by random, you know. If choices were at random, we would get 95% nonjews. Obama specifically chooses jews, from Chief of Staff in the White House, to heading General Motors’ “rescue,” to the Supreme Court. Throughout the government. More jews than Blacks.

In April 2008, the Los Angeles Times reported that Obama said the following to a closed-door group of jews at a synagogue:

“There is a kinship and a sense of shared community that predates my political career and will extend beyond this particular election,” Obama said. … “Know that I will be there for you, just as I believe that you will be there for me.”

… “My links to the Jewish community are not political. They preceded my entry into politics.”

Yes, his links are “not political” because they are “kinship,” which is family. Obama is a secret jew, a crypto-jew. We could stop here. We are beyond reasonable doubt.

Jews wail at the wall in Jerusalem and wail to the world that they are innocent victims. Jews leave out the part where they subverted the host countries, destroying the host cultures, and that's why the European countries' leaders and rulers either limited their freedoms or expelled them. Obama, son of a jewess, is one of them.

Jews wail at the wall in Jerusalem and wail to the world that they are innocent victims. Jews leave out the part where they subverted the host countries, destroying the host cultures, and that’s why the European countries’ leaders and rulers either limited the jews’ freedoms or expelled them. Obama, son of a jewess, is one of them.

Yet, that’s not all. Obama bows to jew rituals, both in our country and in Israel. Some people might think it’s some kind of requirement for an American president to participate in other country’s rituals. It is not. It is especially not a requirement for the president of the United States of America. And please note that Obama doesn’t bow to everybody’s rituals. He bows to the jews’ rituals. Why? Because he is a jew.

Any open-minded, intelligent reader sees the proof already. Others have rejected everything I’ve said already.

So, enough said. Almost. A person could fill a book — that the jew-owned New York publishing world would never publish — lining up the mountain of evidence. I haven’t even touched another entire area, which is Communism. (Communism was created by jews. Karl Marx, son of a rabbi, was of course a jew.) Documented here and here, for starters. (They don’t identify the jews, but the articles are full of jews.) Stanley Ann had deep ties, and so has Obama. Remember: There are only two kinds of Communists: jews and nonjew dupes of jews.

And then there are the nude photos that are, almost certainly, Stanley Ann and taken by Frank Marshall Davis. Davis (another common jew name) was by appearance of the African race and was an avowed Communist. He lived in jew-funded comfort in Chicago and Hawaii, and his movements were parallel to Stanley Ann’s time in those locations–which is why many strong researchers says Davis was actually Barack Obama’s father, not the disposable Kenyan named Obama. Also, Davis, like a jew, wrote a sex novel that a jew publisher printed and promoted. (One of a few good links to the evidence. Update, Nov. 2012: This link has more.) Jews were known for their nude photos and are now infamous for the porn industry, also centered in Hollywood.

Oh, I didn’t mention that Stanley Ann Dunham eventually went into international banking (remember, her mother was a bank vice president). Yes, Obama’s mother specialized in the jew-scam against the poor called micro-finance lending.

Stanley Ann Dunham was a jew, thus Obama is a jew, and that’s why he is a loyal, bowing, servant of Israel and international jewry. And that’s why his enactments, as opposed to his sometimes pretty words, are clearly against us nonjews, and especially against us Whites — the most capable race, when aware and energized, against the race of murderous parasites called jewry.