JB Campbell’s Serious Solution Strategy: Finally, Whites Fight Back

JB Campbell

JB Campbell

Cleanse Our Local Area, Cleanse Our Country

JB Campbell gained military experience in Rhodesia (now the black hell of Zimbabwe). He wrote a book that ignited the militia movement in the USA, which the government crushed by the false-flag bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City. Campbell wrote many important articles for the great Liberty Bell magazine and other publications.

For more of his accomplishments, see his website. My point is that he has earned our respect and attention. He earned our respect and attention long before most of us became jew-aware and race-aware, and that includes me.

Image from an ad in the Liberty Bell magazine in the 1990s.

Image from an ad in the Liberty Bell magazine in the 1990s.

Thanks to the new and very strong website The End Of Zion, I became aware of two powerful videos set to two speeches by Campbell. The full text of one of the speeches is available both on Campbell’s site and on The End Of Zion. The second audio/video had no text, so I have transcribed it for all to enjoy and to quote. I think transcripts are very important for two main reasons:

  1. Many people listen only once and hear what they want to hear, making some mistakes in what they “remember.” I have noticed this occasionally happening even in myself — which a person can only self-learn decisively by listening again, taking good notes, or by making transcripts. Nearly nobody does those, right?
  2. Transcripts allow others to easily copy and publish quotes.

Be warned. Mr. Campbell, obviously, is about Solutions, not the endless “news,” complaining, and distractions on most other truth sites we all know about. Campbell’s language is not camouflaged to avoid legalities. This is for serious Americans (and my definition of “Americans” is “Whites born in the USA,” of course of the Founding Race of our country) who are ready for action and who need some guidance. Also, this is for serious Americans who need a pep talk, or inspiration, and to know that even as individual operators we are not alone in this fight.

The first video is titled by TheEndOfZion as “JB Campbell’s Speech On Gun Control.” The video should be displayed below, with the transcript from Campbell’s site below the video. (The transcript is a copy-and-paste, to which I have added nothing.) If the video is not displayed, here is the link for this video at TheEndOfZion.

Gun Control Is Treason


Who is it, besides the rabid dogs in the Obama administration, that wants us disarmed?

Well, the United Nations wants us disarmed.

Communist China wants us disarmed.

The Israel lobby wants us disarmed.

And of course the Mexican drug cartel wants us disarmed.

These are the international gangsters. They have requested – no, they have demanded – that the Obama gangsters disarm us.

It’s quite possible that a belligerent meeting such as this is what the Obama gangsters want. It’s quite possible that we are being pushed and goaded into violent responses to their violent provocations, such as the sadistic police behavior we’ve seen all over the country.

So what? They mean to enslave all of us and kill some of us. We’re going to have to fight back sooner or later, regardless of whom it pleases or displeases. It’s either fight or start waving the white flag and I doubt that anyone in here is ever going to wave the white flag.

Nope, we’ll fight it out and see who wins. I’m pretty sure it’s going to be us.

There is no doubt that many police departments are encouraged to brutalize us civilians. There is also no denying that many police departments have been trained in Israel or are being trained by visiting Israeli instructors in this country.

Anyone can see where this is leading. It is leading to a totalitarian dictatorship. But only if the dictatorship can get us to hand over our guns.

So it doesn’t matter what the Obama gangsters think they want. What matters is what we want. What matters is, what we are going to do about it.

We pay the bills and we’ll make the decisions.

Anyone who’s hoping there’s a safe, legal and peaceful way to hold on to his guns is going to be disappointed. Gun Control is about who is going to run this country – us or the foreign gangsters. We’re not sure, of course, but it’s possible that Obama himself is a foreign gangster. We’re still waiting on the ID.

If it’s going to be us, then we need to be ready – at the drop of a hat – to fight like wildcats.

The threat we face ranges from a militarized police takeover of the sheriff’s department to the Blackwater-type mercenaries we saw during Katrina right up to full martial law run by the US Army and/or the United Nations. All of these would be run by the CIA front groups such as FEMA and Homeland Security. We’ve already seen the army field manuals on occupation and concentration camps for American dissidents.

As we’ve seen from the Vietnam, the Iraq and Afghanistan disasters, some places cannot be successfully occupied by the US or UN military, no matter how hard they try. Some can, such as Japan, South Korea and West Germany. But some cannot.

All thugs and bullies can be beaten, because they’re mainly into it for the money and the other bennies. It just takes guns and the guts to use them as they were meant to be used. We just need to get it in our heads that Teton County is one county in Idaho that will not be messed with or intimidated, no matter what.

As we see every day, over and over, the gangsters deal in horrific and merciless brutality, mainly overseas but increasingly here at home. It’s called state terror. Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans object to state terror, whether it’s mass murder by bombers, or assassination by drones, bombing weddings and funerals, or sadistic grunts kidnapping, torturing, raping and murdering anyone who might resent American brutality. The list of American terrorism around the world is too long for this meeting.

Many of us have suspected that our military men and women have been trained in Iraq and Afghanistan to brutalize civilians over there as a prelude to do the same to civilians over here. This suspicion began with the infamous 45 Questions for soldiers and marines in 1994 and again just last week with the report that Obama’s litmus test for generals keeping their jobs is their willingness to kill American resisters.

The authors of American state terror, the politicians and the killers, are the same gangsters who want us to hand over our guns to them!

The government knows that America is in an explosive condition, thanks entirely to what the government has been doing to us, especially with 9/11 and its planned tyrannical aftermath known as the War on Terror. It has been waging the War on Terror against foreigners in our name. The government has always planned to attack us Americans, and now it is doing so.

The War on Terror included the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act and the annual NDAA. The Patriot Act obliterated the Bill of Rights. The Fourth Amendment is no more. The gang of nine on the Supreme Court has found no constitutional problem with the Patriot Act, or with any tyrannical action of the Bush and Obama gangsters.

We are not going to be protected by anyone in any part of the federal, state or local government. It is up to us to protect ourselves from the tyrants. It has always been up to us but human nature being what it is, we have trusted our employees to take care of us. This was very bad judgment on our part. It was lazy, it was cowardly and it was wrong. It is reasonable to expect them to join with us against the federal tyrants, but this is our responsibility. After all, we pay the bills.

It is estimated by the government that there are between three hundred and four hundred million firearms in America today. There are more guns in America than there are cars. And guns don’t tend to wear out.

The only thing that stands in the way of a declaration of a totalitarian dictatorship by the Obama administration is this massive number of guns in our hands. And there is the historical fact that America came into being as the result of the violent overthrow of a totalitarian dictatorship. It was not done by Americans fighting a foreign enemy – it was done by Englishmen fighting their own English government. When the fighting was over, the English rebels had become Americans.

The government knows that it cannot disarm us physically. It is an impossibility. The next best thing is to disarm us mentally, psychologically. As the current attorney general, Holder, admitted years ago, in a different administration, we need to be “brainwashed” (his word) to give up our guns.

I started the militia movement thirty years ago this year to counter the attempt by government to brainwash us to give up our guns. I think the movement was successful at least to that extent.

The militia movement was the biggest, fastest-growing voluntary armed movement in American history. It came out of nowhere at a time much less dangerous than today. It collapsed from the shocking federal massacre at Oklahoma City in ’95.

Eighteen years later, we are mentally much tougher and sophisticated than we were then. Federal atrocities still shock us but they no longer make us doubt ourselves or the correctness of our duty.

Thanks to the miracle of the Internet and thanks to the power-mad overreach of the federal gangsters, millions of heavily-armed Americans understand what we are about to experience, which is the naked, violent struggle between the tyrants and the normal people who only want to be left alone. The tyrants cannot leave us alone; they must control us without limit.

Violence is the American way. It is our history and it is our way. The American tendency to violence has been exploited by the government in its genocidal wars against foreigners.

The NDAA for last year authorized the arrest and disappearance of Americans in secret with no due process. The NDAA allows federal agents and the military to kidnap, torture and murder Americans who are considered enemies of the state. Senator Carl Levin revealed last year that these tyrannical licenses to kidnap, torture and murder us were placed in the NDAA on Obama’s insistence.

So now we are confronted with another attempt to outlaw “assault rifles.” Everyone in this room knows what an assault rifle really is: a machine rifle that goes fully automatic and fires an intermediate cartridge. Intermediate means that the brass is shorter and holds less gunpowder and creates a slower bullet velocity than a regular rifle cartridge. Examples are the AK-47 and the M-16 and even the old American M2 carbine.

“Assault rifle” is now a politically-motivated term of hatred, an attempt to make the gun owner appear aggressive and homicidal just by owning one. The term comes from the German original, Sturmgewehr, or storm rifle, a word coined by Adolf Hitler to describe the first one, the StG44. I kind of like the word so I’ll use it tonight. Remember, a storm rifle is really not a storm rifle unless it can be fired full-auto. We’ll just pretend for now that we’re talking about storm rifles and not their semi-automatic cousins that are legal to buy (unless you live in Connecticut). (Which brings up an interesting question…)

We know that the feds aren’t against storm rifles for everyone – just us. The president and the other politicians are surrounded by storm rifles and submachine guns – for their own protection. That’s because they work real good. The president supplies a storm rifle to every soldier and marine he sends overseas to kill foreigners.

Homeland Security just put out a request for bids on 7,000 actual full-auto storm rifles, except when DHS wants some, they are re-named Personal Defense Weapons. In our hands, they are known as Assault Weapons. Do we see how that works?

The CIA has provided storm rifles and much more to the al-Qaeda terrorists in Libya and Syria to overthrow those governments. It did the same thing to the al-Qaeda rebels in Afghanistan in the ‘80s, where the CIA and Zbigniew Brzezinski actually invented al-Qaeda.

The president and his attorney general have provided thousands of civilian and military storm rifles to the Mexican drug cartels, which they used to kill, reportedly, thousands of Mexicans and even some Americans.

Are the Mexicans in the drug cartels our friends, or our enemies? The feds are conducting a War on Drugs. This war has been a declared war by all presidents – and funded by the Congress – going back to Nixon. Can we assume, given that we are waging the War on Drugs, that the drug cartel members would be considered our enemies?

What is the definition of treason? It is to give aid and comfort to an enemy in time of war. We’re in a declared war. Our leaders have given – not just aid and comfort – but thousands of storm rifles to our enemy during this war, which the enemy used to slaughter thousands of Mexicans and also some Americans, to justify disarming us. It really doesn’t get more treasonous than that.

What Obama and Holder did was not only treason, it was international terrorism, according to Title 22 USC 2656f(d). Go to the CIA’s website and you can get the CIA’s definition of terrorism, which is: “The term ‘terrorism’ means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by clandestine agents or groups.”

“The term ‘international terrorism’ means terrorism involving the territory or the citizens of more than one country.”

Does that sound like “Fast and Furious” to you?

I know – it also sounds like Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and on and on. Tonight, though, we’re just talking about gun control. But how revolting is it that these animals would provide storm rifles (which they bought with TARP bailout money) to the most sadistic, head-chopping murderers in Mexico with orders to mow down thousands of Mexicans – merely to justify the annulment of the 2nd Amendment?

These guys are really playing with fire in a desperate attempt to disarm us. They, along with the narco-assassins – are remorseless killers.

I have another definition of treason: Gun Control is Treason.

Anyone and everyone in the gun-confiscation food chain is a traitor to the people and the country, from the very top to the very bottom.

We all know what the penalty for treason is.

Anyone who would disarm us – take away our ability to defend ourselves – is our deadly enemy. It doesn’t matter what his or her excuse is – it’s an act of war against us.

There’s no legal or procedural method to stop a gun-grabber. The official gun-grabber, who means to strip you defenseless, can only be stopped with a gun. He’s the most dangerous enemy we have because he’s got a license to kill us. The license is good for any reason or for no reason at all.

In Indiana, it’s illegal to try to stop an official home invasion even if there’s no warrant, even if they’ve got the wrong house. I doubt this law will last long, along with the judge who dreamed it up. The best cure for official, warrantless home invasions is about five rounds of buckshot zinging down the hallway as they storm in, screaming obscenities and pounding on the walls. The fun and excitement will leak out of that sort of thing very quickly.

This is America. America was founded in violence and it runs on violence. The colonists tried for decades to obtain, in a peaceful manner, their freedom from the vicious, greedy English dictatorship. It was impossible. Change and freedom could only be obtained through violent revolution.

The violent nature of America will never change. The bad guys always have guns. It’s a fact of life. The worst guys have some of the most impressive guns. We know this because we paid for them. I’m talking about government gunmen. It is our sacred duty to defend ourselves and our loved ones from government gunmen who are at this very moment planning and devising ways to strip us defenseless and put us someplace where we’re never heard from again.

We might ask ourselves what these remorseless traitors have in store for us that first requires us to be disarmed? We’ve seen what they’ve done to others at Abu Ghraib, Bagram, Guantanamo and in secret CIA torture centers all around the world. CIA and army whistleblowers are being sent to prison for trying to warn us what is in store for opponents of the American war lords. Does anyone think we can trust torturers to be nice to us after we hand over our guns to them?

We normal, decent Americans already have the necessary equipment to defend ourselves from government gunmen who want to disarm us. We’ve got all the guns we need. Ammunition is another matter. The current shortage of ammunition is a serious development. A first step is to encourage manufacturers to sell only to American civilians and not to the Department of Homeland Security or any agency of the federal government. These agencies are deliberately creating ammo shortages with their insane orders for billions of rounds. After all, we’re paying the bills, so the ammo needs to go to us, the actual owners.

Okay, so the subject tonight is gun control in Teton County. How should we respond if Feinstein’s bill, or something like it, becomes law?

Obviously we will ignore it and continue to trade among ourselves and with other like-minded Americans. But what if confiscation becomes law? At that point, we start making changes. We, the ones who pay the bills, take over the law. Our law will become what used to be called, “Frontier Justice.” Attempts at confiscation will receive the death penalty. We have no choice in this life and death matter.

Anyone who would disarm us is our deadly enemy and must be put to death.

We will not try to hide behind elected officials. We are responsible for everything, especially including our self-defense. We here in Teton County cannot expect a sheriff and a handful of deputies to fight federal gun-grabbers for us, which is a preposterous idea. The sheriff and his deputies can certainly help us and are expected to do so, but we will take full responsibility for defending ourselves.

We need to have secure communications with each other that will continue to function if cell towers or generators are turned off by man or nature.

We must develop a standard procedure of immediate action in the event any county resident is attacked by gun-grabbers.

This is the essence of our new neighborhood watch program: our readiness to defend our fellow residents from federal attackers.

This will also apply to any attempt at police or military roadblocks in Teton County. Travel is not a privilege – it is a natural right.

Roadblocks will not be allowed to exist. There will also be no TSA or DHS aggression allowed or tolerated in the county.

We now know that drones have been used against us here in the valley, so we encourage the shooting down of these dangerous weapons at the first opportunity. Look up when you hear something overhead.

We learned in the Rhodesian war that the safest way to travel through terrorist-infested areas was to have a convoy of at least two vehicles, several hundred yards apart. It will certainly come to that in many parts of America but we must begin thinking in these terms even in Teton County.


The second video with JB Campbell’s audio is titled “The NDAA Equals Treason.” Again, the video should be displayed below, but if not, here is the link to the video at TheEndOfZion. The transcript is by me, James Laffrey, on 19Feb2013. (Note: I didn’t understand two words, so I left underline blanks in place of them. Also, I added a few words, which are in square brackets.)

The NDAA Equals Treason

This government has revealed that it is at war with us. It needs to be destroyed.

The damage the government has done to this country and the rest of the world can never be guaged or measured. Our lives are now in deadly danger — with no exagerration.

Two entire branches of the government — the executive and the judicial — have declared war on us with the disappearance laws, and the murder laws, and the take-away-our-citizenship laws. They put us under military rule, the same as the Iraqis were, same as the Afghans still are. No difference.

Millions of Americans are in dungeons today, people who hurt no one except maybe themselves, cruelly put in cages with murderers and rapists. That, alone, is cause for destroying every vestige of this government. Millions of shattered lives, of prisoners and their families.

The terrorist collection agency we referred to a minute ago — the IRS — has destroyed countless lives and destroyed countless families, stolen our savings, our homes, and our freedom. The IRS collects for the jewish loan sharks who run the Federal Reserve company — the actual engine of our destruction.

Now, if we had been a politically mature people, we’d have killed every member of the secret police — meaning the CIA and FBI — which we could identify back in 1964 after the shock of Dallas wore off. [The JFK assassination was 22 Nov. 1963.]

If we had been a politically mature people, we’d have killed every Israeli in Washington [DC] and all of their American jewish helpers in 1967 following their attack on the U.S.S. Liberty.

If we’d been aware of the background of 9/11, we’d have killed every member of the PNAC [Project for the New American Century] gang that designed the magic massacre.

I can say the same for a dozen outrages since ’63, especially the Vietnam and Muslim wars.

Many Americans are not able to see the similarity between programmable vote machines and programmable slot machines, so they keep voting, expecting to change things in that manner, exactly as they keep feeding dollars into the slots in casinos across the country expecting a different outcome.

It’s true that most Americans don’t vote now — some being aware but most being apathetic. But apathy is better than compliance, so that’s a good sign. The way to turn that apathy into interest and then into action is what we’re looking for.

The way to do it is by attacking the tyrants who are planning to imprison us, disappear us, torture us, and kill us — and to do it at every opportunity they give us. This will become a trend and will catch on, America being what it is. As a Japanese general is said to have remarked after Pearl Harbor: “America is a sleeping giant that will be filled with a terrible resolve.”

Almost 11 million guns were bought last year, 3 million during Christmas, which is another very good sign. My mission is to bring as many of those new guns and the scores of millions of others into action against the tyrants. That’s what the guns are for.

Some maybe-well-meaning pundits are encouraging Americans to leave the country. Why? And go somewhere you can’t own guns? And miss out on the opportunity to kill tyrants here at home? This is unbelievable to me. We are about to change history.

We have all the guns we need. All we do need are the guts and the brains to use them to kill tyrants. Not harmless people. Tyrants: anybody who forces you to do what you don’t want to do. And nobody can do this when you’re armed and ready.

This is the winning mindset.

Never say that you’re ready to die for this or that. That’s Christian defeatism. You must be ready to kill in defense of yourself, your loved ones, your friends, and your dignity.

Dignity is very important, which is why the TSA make you take off your shoes at the airport. Taking off your shoes in public robs you of your dignity and makes you feel weak.

Hell, you must be ready to kill in defense of your pets, your vehicle, whatever. Forget legalities. The government doesn’t care about legalities. Neither do we. The government is getting ready to kill us. This is the new law — the law of survival, and the defense of our dignity.

It is probably going to happen this year. The government knows something that we don’t. Otherwise, it wouldn’t have rushed the treason acts through Congress the way it did, with the crackhead signing them on the last day of the year.

We’re on notice that the crackdown is about to occur. We can hope it doesn’t, but I’d say that’s a forlorn hope. I mean, the Army and the Marines are trained to kill on demand. Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill — as one ashamed veteran recently described the training.

It’s possible that some of the guys won’t go along. But the jewish training we saw at Abu Ghraib, and still see in Guantanamo, has made many thousands of these young people into serial killers. The spectacle of Marines urinating on their dead victims indicates the sort of training they received and are receiving today.

The psychopathic behavior of helicopter pilots and drone operators must be noted along with the __ __ who collect body parts. Note also the degenerate personality of the big American sniper [Chris Kyle, who was recently killed] who cheerfully lied about suckerpunching Jesse Ventura. No doubt he has lied about his body count also, but that doesn’t make him any less dangerous or less deserving of being shot on sight. He deserves exactly what he did to his victims.

Once the roadblocks and home invasions start, all offenders and potential offenders must be shot on sight — either close-up or from a distance, your choice. We can’t take any prisoners because we don’t need them for anything. We don’t want to feed and care for them, so we must shoot them immediately.

There can be no mercy shown to anyone who would be willing to harm us, harm our families and our friends. They don’t intend to show us any mercy — let me tell you.

Enemy policy-makers should be captured if possible, or killed if capture is not possible. At some point, enemy policy-makers will be captured and interrogated. When we are satisfied with their information, they’ll receive the same treatment that they, the chickenhawks, arranged for Saddam Hussein, who was their loyal stooge.

Now, I’m suggesting a reward system for killing or capturing members of the Council On Foreign Relations: with a minimum of 100,000 dollars for any member, up to a million dollars for high-value types. I am proposing that this be paid by the governments of the CFR’s victims overseas, mainly to prevent war and the continuing annihilation of their people.

As we know, the CFR recently announced that is was time to attack Iran. The only way to prevent this latest CFR-ordered catastrophe is to wipe out the CFR. Their horrific and bloody history and network of power preclude any attempt to bring them to legalistic justice since they own the justice system. The CFR has given us no other way to stop its sadistic megalomania and lust for total power.

All Israelis in America are hostile enemy aliens and must be shot on sight. This also applies to their American jewish helpers — the syanim. The Israelis and American jews are behind the crackdown that is planned for us just as they were behind 9/11 and the attack on the Liberty.

The resistance, therefore, has two basic goals. One local and one national.

The local goal is to cleanse the local area, wherever in America that is, of tyrants who would be involved in martial law — that is, state terrorism against us. Police in uniforms and in plainclothes must make it very clear to us that they will in no way cooperate with FEMA, Homeland Security, FBI, et cetera. Any police who’ll cooperate with the federal tyrants gets the same treatment, as we know the police departments of the major cities are cooperating with CIA and the Mossad. So, the executives of these corrupt departments must receive executive action.

This will be the responsibility of local civilians.

And finally, the national goal is to cleanse the federal government of tyrants, most of which are members of the Council On Foreign Relations. The warlords must be exterminated before they kill us all.

Our lives and the lives of millions depend on the actions of the resistance to tyranny.

And that concludes my remarks.



My only postscript is that those of us who are able to act individually have no reason to wait in regard to personal, careful, covert progress on “expelling” the enemy invaders among us. That’s what the writers and talkers have not done for 100 years, thus no progress has been made in whittling away the entire jew network across the country. Why leave them at full strength and growing? That’s foolish and suicidal. We need individual heroes right now, whose heroism must go unsung until victory is won.



The Other Half Of JFK

Famous JFK Half-Quotes Are Half-Truths. Deliberate Half-Truths Are Lies.

President John F. Kennedy and wife Jackie just moments before JFK was shot in the throat and the head in Dallas, Texas, November 22, 1963.

Maybe Well-Intentioned, Many People Cherry-Pick Quotes, Leave Out Pits.

Foreword: The president of the United States was murdered on November 22, 1963. The directors and the multiple shooters of that assassination of John F. Kennedy were never brought to justice. Every president since then has helped the treasonous cover-up. These facts alone should stir real Americans to unite and perform a complete sweep of our infested government. When we add the more recent crimes committed by the same infestation: 9/11, self-destructive wars, and the bankers’ national robbery of us — to name only three — there’s just no excuse for our people’s inaction. We must Defend Ourselves.

We all want to hold onto somebody as a hero or as an admirable person, a model of the kind of people we need now. Many people look back to President John F. Kennedy as the last good president.

Well, my purpose today is not to argue for or against. My purpose is to put the fruit that fell from his mouth back together again, pits and all. The evidence will speak for itself, conclusively.

Two quotes in particular are of special interest to me and, I hope, to all Americans who want the full truth.

  1. The most famous quote is from the “secret societies” speech (full transcript below).
  2. And the other is about Adolf Hitler.

Let’s take the short one first.

JFK’s cherry and pit on Hitler

Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin: jew partners in crimes against White humanity. Yes, against White humanity. Think about it. The strongest of our White race was in Germany. Those three leaders sent Whites to kill Whites, that is, Whites to kill each other. The Japanese were secondary, but jews enjoyed mass-murdering the Japanese, too, especially by dropping totally unnecessary atomic bombs on two civilian populations.

I haven’t read JFK’s diaries nor have I read a book containing his diary entries, but apparently the Institute for Historical Research has. In that publication’s article linked here, JFK is described as having taken a trip to Germany in 1945, soon after World War 2 ended there. JFK was 28 years old, and Germany lay destroyed by the Allies. The “Allies” were Russia, the United States of America, and England, to name the biggies. (Yes, Joseph Stalin’s jew-controlled Soviet Russia and the USA were allies against Hitler’s White Germany. Doesn’t that provide a giant clue to who the one honest leader was?)

In Germany, Kennedy toured various locations, including Hitler’s residence.

I highly recommend the article linked above. I’m fighting the temptation to write about other details in the article. I’ll stick to the main point.

Adolf Hitler, hosting the Olympics in 1936 while FDR and his jew-brother bankers kept the USA suffering in economic Depression.

Admirable web-writers who have overcome criminal-jewry’s monumental lies about Adolf Hitler have quoted Kennedy’s diary entry in regard to Hitler. Here’s the quote some of them have used:

“[W]ithin a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived.”

And some quoters include a bit more:

“He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”

Well, that’s nice. But it’s not the whole quote. As rendered by the Institute for Historical Research, the full quote is this:

“After visiting these places, you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived.

He had boundless ambition for his country which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.”

You see the difference. JFK said Hitler’s ambition “rendered him a menace to the peace of the world.” That is wrong. Anyone who has read enough of World War 2 history, including the mass of material written and spoken by Hitler himself and translated into English, knows that Hitler was not the menace to peace. FDR, Churchill, and Stalin wanted the war and conspired to make it happen, using Poland as an excuse. One would think that Kennedy knew better than that ignorant quote.

According to jewry, Chamberlain (left) “appeased” Hitler (center) at this meeting in Munich, Germany, in 1938. Vital knowledge to keep in mind is this: International jewry had declared war on Germany and all Germans in 1933, and WW2 started in 1939. So, who really started WW2 and when?

JFK’s father had been an international player with top jews not only in the liquor business but as ambassador to England. England’s prime minister prior to the heinous Winston Churchill was Neville Chamberlain, who knew Hitler was not a menace to the peace of the world. Jews charged Chamberlain with “appeasing” Hitler and forced Chamberlain out. From the jew point of view, there was a danger of real peace breaking out with Hitler and Chamberlain in charge.

The jew version of “peace” is jews controlling everything and the rest of us being their “peaceful,” oppressed workers, at best.

JFK, knowing his place as a man being groomed for high office, surely wrote his diary with the future in mind. Of course, if I’m wrong, then JFK didn’t actually write the “menace” phrase, and it was added later by the controllers of published history for public consumption.

Hitler was the last honest and admirable leader of a major country in modern history. Criminal jewry reversed that truth. The full Kennedy quote follows the jew agenda.

JFK’s ‘Secret Societies’ and the missing pit

Why not say “Communists,” Mr. President? And sir, why not say “Communists are jews”? Were you a coward or complicit?

A much more popular quote by JFK is from his speech about secret societies and related matters. Kennedy’s title for the speech was actually “The President and the Press.” We can do a search on google or yahoo or whatever and find many published excerpts and published videos that include the actual sound recording of that speech.

The problem, of course, is that in their zeal to promote JFK as good or to promote the truth that secret groups exist, the quoters use only the part they like. And then there are the copycats who simply re-publish the quotes without even trying to check the original.

JFK surely made some good and true statements about our domestic enemies who swear secret oaths and have conspired to undermine and overthrow the main culture of the Founding Fathers and subsequent Americans who grew this country to greatness.

Lying Baines Johnson

But President Lyndon Baines Johnson said some great things, too, didn’t he? And President Richard Nixon said some great things, too, right? And Ford — well, no, not Ford. Presidents Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama have said some great things, too, haven’t they? Mixed with the great, they also said some truth about their treasonous intentions. And then the actions of all of those presidents proved their treasonous intentions.

Eight Is Enough. After LBJ & cabal’s crimes of obstruction and cover-up in the investigation of the JFK assassination, these eight have continued the obstruction of justice.

Well, JFK’s speech about secret societies likewise proved his intentions. The other side, the dark side, the truth he spoke that day, couched between passages of humor and lip-service to our “free and open society,” was a call to increase government secrecy for “national security.”

The key sentence is this one:

“I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.”

And Kennedy went into striking detail about it. Please read the two-faced speech of 27 April 1961 for yourself in the full transcript below. Or listen to the full speech at this jfklibrary link. After the transcript, I’ll have some critical and closing remarks.

The transcript was originally found at this link. I made slight corrections. A full transcript is also at the above jfklibrary link.


“Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:

I appreciate very much your generous invitation to be here tonight.

You bear heavy responsibilities these days, and an article I read some time ago reminded me of how particularly heavily the burdens of present day events bear upon your profession.

You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx.

We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and managing editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the “lousiest petty bourgeois cheating.”

But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath to the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the Cold War.

If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper man.

I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight “The President and the Press.” Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded “The President Versus the Press.” But those are not my sentiments tonight.

It is true, however, that when a well-known diplomat from another country demanded recently that our State Department repudiate certain newspaper attacks on his colleague it was unnecessary for us to reply that this Administration was not responsible for the press, for the press had already made it clear that it was not responsible for this Administration.

Nevertheless, my purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one party press. On the contrary, in recent months I have rarely heard any complaints about political bias in the press except from a few Republicans. Nor is it my purpose tonight to discuss or defend the televising of Presidential press conferences. I think it is highly beneficial to have some 20,000,000 Americans regularly sit in on these conferences to observe, if I may say so, the incisive, the intelligent and the courteous qualities displayed by your Washington correspondents.

Nor, finally, are these remarks intended to examine the proper degree of privacy which the press should allow to any President and his family.

If in the last few months your White House reporters and photographers have been attending church services with regularity, that has surely done them no harm.

On the other hand, I realize that your staff and wire service photographers may be complaining that they do not enjoy the same green privileges at the local golf courses that they once did.

It is true that my predecessor did not object as I do to pictures of one’s golfing skill in action. But neither on the other hand did he ever bean a Secret Service man.

My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors.

I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future — for reducing this threat or living with it — there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security — a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.

This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President — two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.


The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my con trol. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In times of “clear and present danger,” the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.

Today no war has been declared — and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions — by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence — on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security — and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.

On many earlier occasions, I have said — and your newspapers have constantly said — that these are times that appeal to every citizen’s sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.

I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.

Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: “Is it news?” All I suggest is that you add the question: “Is it in the interest of national security?” And I hope that every group in America — unions and businessmen and public officials at every level — will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to this same exacting test.

And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.

Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.


It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation — an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people — to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well — the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers — I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: “An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it.” We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed — and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment — the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution — not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants” — but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news — for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security — and we intend to do it.


It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder, and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world’s efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.

And so it is to the printing press — to the recorder of man’s deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news — that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help, man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”


Marx and Meat

Karl Marx, jew, son of a rabbi. A rabbi is a teacher of the jew racial rules book called the Talmud. It is not religion. Read a little of the Talmud and quickly see for yourself.

JFK started the speech by repeating jewry’s tale of Karl Marx’s beginnings, thus making that heinous jew a sympathetic character. Why would Kennedy do such a thing? Most people, being ignorant about history, will take JFK’s statements as truth, as if Marx could have been caressed into being an honest assimilated jew instead of an enemy. But for those of us who know, this kind of presidential propaganda is sickening. However, it’s likely that Kennedy brought up Marx to suggest, without saying the word “Communism,” that Communism is that “secret society.”

Kennedy had to have known that jews created Communism to dupe and undermine, foremost, the Eur-Asians of Russia and China. For us, jews created Capitalism to undermine our republic of free Commerce for all, as the Constitution stipulates. Look them up: Both Communism and Capitalism were created in the 1800s by the jews Karl Marx and his jew comrades. However, JFK let his audience imagine that he was talking about Communism, and in the USA, the general public did not know that Communism=Jews. Thus, jews were being protected by JFK’s speech, and he surely knew what he was doing.

Now, as we turn to the meat of JFK’s speech, I want to say that surely there was no need to increase government operative secrecy.

FDR. Even the chair was kept secret by the jew-owned media during his treasonous four-term reign.

Crypto-jew President Franklin Roosevelt (and link here) had established plenty of secrecy in his treasonous, four-term reign. Crypto-jew President Harry “S” Truman came next and signed the establishment of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a secretive governmental crime operation. Crypto-jew President Dwight David Eisenhower presided over a massive increase in the entire Military Industrial Intelligence Complex, and then he had the audacity to issue his famous “warning” that the Military Industrial Complex could become a threat to our Constitutional republic. Before becoming president, Eisenhower, as general “Ike” (a common jew nickname), had presided over the mass starvation-murders of a million German prisoners. That’s a crime against humanity. Eisenhower should have been hung at Nuremberg, not honest Hitler’s loyal men.

And then Eisenhower presided over the cover-up, the confiscation of documents all over Europe, and the storing of them out of sight of the American people to this day. Jewry rewarded him with two terms in the White House.

JFK followed Eisenhower. JFK needed more governmental secrecy? Absurd.

Now, in JFK’s defense, we can say that the fact of his being murdered — by multiple shooters not Lee Harvey Oswald — seems to be proof that Kennedy was not a jew and that Kennedy attempted to do some good along with the bad. Jewry murdered him for it. What did he attempt? Various historians and investigative writers cite one or both of the following:

  1. JFK’s Executive Order on printing money independent of the jews’ Federal Reserve Bank system.
  2. JFK’s opposition to Israel becoming a nuclear-weapons power.

But if JFK was a true American, we have to ask why he didn’t tell the American people the full truth about jewry’s control of those secret societies. Why didn’t he tell the full truth about jewry’s control of media, Hollywood, Las Vegas, education policy, the medical system, the legal system, and whatever else he knew? If he had told the people, the people would have had a chance to rise up against the enemy network and to protect the “Profile In Courage” president. But JFK had no such courage.

JFK parties with Frank Sinatra (left) and Peter Lawford. Sinatra and Lawford lived charmed lives in jew-controlled entertainment, including jew-mob’s Las Vegas, and both chose jew-founded Cedars-Sinai Hospital in which to die. They were crypto-jews, which means secret jews. “Italian Jews” are jews. The jew Albert Einstein and many rabbis have openly said that jews are loyal only to jewry, never to the country they are living in. Thus, jews are jews, not “Italian jews,” not “German jews,” not “American jews,” etc.

Kennedy didn’t even say the word “jew.” Let me explain further about the perception of Communism at that time. When Kennedy made that speech, the public had already been fed mass doses of “Communism from the Soviet Union is the enemy.” It was only a few years earlier that Senator Joseph McCarthy had conducted his very public effort against “Communists” in the government, Hollywood, and elsewhere in our country. McCarthy chose to use the word “Communists” rather than “jews,” which would have been the exactly accurate name for the Enemy.

The late great American historian Eustace Mullins wrote that he, Mullins, had informed McCarthy of the jews of Communism, but McCarthy chose the “safer” term. And what good did “safer” do him? He was still railroaded, tarred, and feathered by the jew-owned media and the jew-controlled government — with crypto-jew Eisenhower as president.

The lower-level dupes in the press (I used to be one of those, in my former ignorance, working for the former Nashville Banner daily newspaper) and the small segment of the public who might have heard or read JFK’s words would have thought “Communists” and not “jews.” Kennedy knew it. Here comes the nail in the coffin. Kennedy said:

“For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage;”

That is a direct reference to what Soviet leaders had said. It is not meant as a reference to jews. (Jews in the USA had already owned, for example, the New York Times for six decades and had no need for the theft, bribery, nor espionage.) Other statements could be culled from JFK’s speech to further prove my point.

Thus, we can discard this speech as part of what got JFK in trouble with criminal-jewry. The speech was to keep Communism as the boogeyman (thus keeping attention off jewry in the U.S.), and to increase secrecy, thus further enabling criminal jewry. Also, the speech was cover for the jew media (ABC, NBC, CBS, New York Times, Washington Post, Time magazine, etc.) to continue withholding the truth from us.

Why then did jewry murder JFK? We have only his supposed interfering with jewry’s control of our money and his reported interfering in illegal-Israel’s affairs in regard to nuclear weapons.


Revilo P. Oliver, professor, true patriot, and scholar of classical languages including the original languages of the jew “Christian” Bible.

The late great Revilo P. Oliver, writing in the truly patriotic Liberty Bell magazine of the 1970s-1990s, tackled this subject. His amazing article is titled “Killing Kennedy.” (Link to the article only, opens as a pdf file. However, in that pdf, the footnotes are confusingly disorganized and repeated. Link to the entire issue of the October 1992 Liberty Bell, highly recommended, opens as a pdf.)

In this article, Oliver refers to a previous article he had published, which had stirred readers to request that he write more on the assassination. Why is Prof. Oliver an authoritative source? Number One: Oliver was not a jew. Also, Oliver worked for Intelligence during World War 2, before Oliver realized that our government is not ours and is jew infested. Oliver maintained patriotic sources of information. Furthermore, he was a scholar of history in a very deep sense. Thus, readers were correct in clamoring for Oliver to write more on the assassination of JFK.

Referring to his previous article, Oliver wrote:

In my article I indicated the major motive for the assassination of Kennedy: the need to abort the growing dissatisfaction of the American people with a government that was obviously acting in the interests of our enemies, the masters of Communist Russia—a dissatisfaction that had been brought close to the boiling point by the Indignation Meetings held throughout the country, which were sponsored by patriotic Americans in Dallas.
This purpose was achieved and the pro-American movement liquidated by the assassination, followed by a spectacular funeral for which the Army detachment had been diligently rehearsed in advance and at which Jacqueline Kennedy gave a brilliant performance. A well-contrived deluge of wildly irrational bathos in the press and over television sufficed to reduce the majority of Americans to the status of savages who beat their breasts and howl when their big chief dies.

Oliver was not one to withhold his sarcasm for the enemy and for the seemingly willfully ignorant sheeple.

Later in the article, Oliver gets to the subject of the famous Executive Order 11110. More than that, though, Oliver tells us about JFK’s supposed popularity, which is information the jew media never tell us about their myth of “Camelot,” do they?

Now Executive Order No. 11110 is indexed in the Federal Register as pertaining to treasury notes and silver certificates, and the reported tenor of it was quite plausible. It was even possible, though unlikely, that the amount mentioned had been printed, although not put into circulation. The report therefore was not invalidated by a
mistake about Kennedy’s intent and about the effect of Lincoln’s issue of ‘greenbacks.’

It must be remembered that in the autumn of 1963, Kennedy’s popularity had been greatly impaired and he could not have been reelected in 1964 without some heroic effort to regain the favor he had lost. (See the appendix below). It would have been reasonable for him to try some spectacular manoeuvre that would be commended by many of the intelligent Americans whom his conduct in office had alienated and angered—especially a manoeuvre that seemed to avert national bankruptcy and to limit the looting of the country by the Federal Reserve. His administration, furthermore, was riddled by fighting for power within it, and such an order, even if never carried out, would have sufficed to intimidate some factions.

There appeared to be a real rift within the organization of our rulers (as distinct from dissent simulated to entertain the populace). A correspondent kindly informs me that he clearly remembers that, not long before Kennedy was expunged, Eisenhower appeared on television irately to denounce Kennedy for plans to tamper with the sacrosanct Federal Reserve, going so far as to regret that he had not campaigned for Nixon and thus assured his election in place of Kennedy. Since I almost never watch the Jews’ picture-shows, I did not see that program. I do have vague recollections of very adverse criticism of Kennedy by the Super-Sheeny, Avraham ben Elazar, alias Dr. Henry Kissinger, who was probably the Jewish satrap in charge of supervising the government in Washington. This seemed to indicate an internal struggle among our rulers, possibly a struggle between two factions of the ruling race.

They are all jews, folks. From the open jews such as Benjamin Shalom Bernanke of the Federal Reserve (top left), to crypto-jews such as Timothy Geithner of the U.S. Treasury (top right).

As you can see, the Oliver article is a must-read. I have excerpted only a tiny portion of it. Continue reading it to learn about Abraham Lincoln, the Federal Reserve, and Oliver’s assertion that JFK’s action on money would simply be “a new ‘greenback’ swindle.” Kennedy’s Secretary of the U.S. Treasury was C. Douglas Dillon, of course a jew.

In a footnote, Oliver completes his overturning of what we have been “taught” about Executive Order 11110:

And so, needless to say, it was not revoked by Johnson after the assassination made him President. Kennedy’s last Executive Order 11127, 9 November 1963, concerned a strike on the Florida East Coast Railway. Johnson’s first orders were 11128, giving Federal employees a holiday on Monday, 25 November; 11129, extolling Kennedy and renaming the Atlantic Missile Range in his honor; and 11130, appointing the Warren Commission.

Israel’s Nuclear Weapons

The only subject left is the question of whether JFK went against jewry by standing in the way of Israel becoming a nuclear-weapons power.

At this point, in light of all of the above information, it is nearly impossible to believe such a story. However, what if JFK did, temporarily, block Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons? What if JFK did block Israel from finishing the nuclear-weapons production facility widely reported as being started in the late 1950s underground at Dimona? We have no need for that as an additional reason for jewry to kill him. But if true, it would fit with jewry’s historic behavior, though it would not fit JFK’s. By the way, how about that Dimona being started during the 1950s? Started during jew Eisenhower’s presidency, and not a peep from “Ike” about it. That is because Ike was a jew.


The above evidence is surely enough damning evidence about JFK, and yet I have more, which I intend to include in a shorter article to follow this one. (Update, 9 Dec. 2012: Part 2 is here.) For now, let us conclude this article with the following  points.

On the left is Vladimir Lenin, a crypto-jew infamous mass-murderer of White Russians. On the right is son-of-a-rabbi Michael Chertoff, open jew. In the wake of 9/11, Chertoff was the head of the criminal division of the U.S. Dept. of Justice (department of cover-up), and in 2005 was made head of the Dept. of Homeland Security by traitor president G. W. Bush. Lenin and Chertoff model two of the most famous jew physical features: nose shape and skull shape.

Communism has been replaced by Terrorism as the boogeyman keeping attention off jewry, which most people don’t realize. (Terrorism is another jew orchestration. Look at 9/11: Jews controlled every agency and company directly involved, from Larry Silverstein to Michael Chertoff.) Likewise, most people don’t know that Communism = Jewry. Marx and Engels, who JFK mentioned, were jews.

In regard to the “secret societies” partial quote by JFK that has been widely repeated on the Internet, it is fair to think that most people believe Kennedy — especially when they hear a clip of the recording of the speech — right?

So, what’s keeping our people from a proper reaction to JFK’s message and warning? I have Questions for my fellow Americans.

  • Which part of “secret society” do our fellow Americans not understand?
  • Which part of “a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” do our fellow Americans not understand?
  • Which part of “..military, government, education …” do our fellow Americans not understand?

JFK didn’t say “jews” because he was deliberately protecting them. Otherwise, he was correct. The secret society is monolithic: “mono” means one. It is one ruthless conspiracy around the world. And just as “monotheism” means one god, “monolithic” means one entity. That entity is the jew race.

The species is “homo sapiens sapiens,” which we call modern humans. The sub-species are called “races.” Blacks, Arabs, and Whites are races. Arabs and Whites are closely related while Blacks are the most distant genetically and in average IQ. Scientific facts. Jews are a race, most of whom pretend to be Whites. Above, Barack Obama Sr., the late Muammar Gaddafi of Libya, and James Laffrey. Three races somewhat different physically, chemically, and mentally. See the Rushton link for proof of that. We have been mis-led to be ignorant of the importance and the reality of Race.

(For readers who see the word “race” and go woozy, read this one recent article as a pdf file by the late J. Philippe Rushton, professor of evolutionary psychology. The reality of race is proved and plain to see. For that link and much more, see the TopLinks page right here on www!)

For Americans who still think that perhaps Muslims are the ultimate enemy, or a group of White men, or other nonjews, consider the following. If jews are not the ultimate enemy, then it would have to be explained how a nonjew power has allowed jews to own the Federal Reserve Bank System, own our media, own Hollywood, flood the top jobs in higher education, flood every president’s administration, and on and on. State your case. Otherwise, get on board, people. Get on board. JFK died in 1963, and he said it was already a worldwide conspiracy throughout governments, military, education, etc. JFK was murdered by them. We’ve spent our entire lives under their network of treason and oppression. Enough already. Enough.

Rise up. Choose the Solution activity that fits your capabilities. Do it. In Self Defense, in defense of our families, in defense of our race, and in defense of our White-founded White-built country. Do it now and untill it’s done. Don’t wait for others to show the way. That’s what too many others are doing already. Step up. Help show the way. They will follow.

Whites Will Win! — again.


James T. Laffrey


Face the Reality Of Race. Truth and Consequences

James Laffrey, White American, not a fake-named Internet coward.

Note: I am proud of my growth from ignorance to wisdom on race — an ignorance forced upon me and my fellow Americans from childhood by the jew-media monopoly and the jew-corrupted government. I awoke to the Reality Of Race at the age of 54 (now 55). Better late than never. I invite everyone to allow race information a hearing. Let yourself learn about race. Allow yourself to read and consider what people of your own race have investigated and published. When one race viciously defends their own race — that is jewry — but pushes the other races to mix their blood and cultures, there is a reason. Ignorant, we lose. Wise, we will win.

‘Human race’ is wrong

Nature has produced many species of mammal animals. Many species have sub-species.

Collie at left. Not “all” rottweilers are vicious.

Dogs are a species. In dogs, we call the sub-species “breeds.” We could call the sub-species “races,” but we don’t. Collies and Rottweilers are two very different sub-species, two different breeds, two “races” of dogs. Those “races” of dogs are very different in both physicality and mentality. Which races of dogs do you want, and not want, around your infants and toddlers?

Horses are a species. Again, we call the sub-species of horses “breeds.” We could call the sub-species “races,” but we don’t. We say “breeds.” Horses to pull farm equipment, horses for racing, Arabian horses for riding, and Clydesdales are examples of quite different “races” of horses in both physicality and mentality. Which horses would you want, or not want, your children to attempt to ride?

Clockwise: plow horse, Clydesdales, Arabian.

Humans are a mammal species, too. We humans also have different sub-species, or breeds, but we officially use the term “races” for our sub-species.

Liars and dupes say, “We are all one race: the human race.” No. We are one species. We are not one race, as anyone with senses can notice.

Our eyes notice the color differences, the physical differences from hair texture, to skull size, nose shape, lip size, leg length, butt shape, and more, such as who runs in violent gangs and who commits the most violent crimes. Our noses can smell differences that occur in patterns by race. Our ears inform us who carry the traits of honesty versus dishonesty, or being fair versus being cheats, or being self-defenders versus murderers. Our races differ in physicality and mentality. No doubt.

Some of the valid science documented during the last 100 years:

  • American physical anthropologist and Professor of Anthropology Carleton Coon‘s textbooks, including the origin of The Races Of Europe, 1939 (link opens as a pdf file).
  • Carleton Putnam‘s assemblage of science in his books, including Race and Reality (opens as a pdf file), 1967.
  • Physicist turned scholar of history, independent broadcaster, and race organizer William Luther Pierce covered history by race and organized facts of biology and archaeology in his great book Who We Are, 1978 (opens as normal text; link here opens as a pdf file).
  • William Gayley Simpson‘s assemblage of the science and undeniable conclusions in his 1978 book Which Way Western Man? An appendix in the book offers a long, superb list of scientists and professors who published the truth about the reality of race.
  • Richard Fuerle‘s Erectus Walks Amongst Us, from 2008 (link opens as clickable web pages), is the most recent politically incorrect book in this group. However, a Fuerle flaw is his kindness to jewry. (This link opens as a pdf.) Excellent images included.
  • Or, jump back in time and read Charles Darwin‘s historic Origin Of Species from 1859. He wrote before the discovery of DNA, yet he was still correct about almost everything. (Link opens quickly as a pdf. Also here. Darwin-online.org.uk discusses the historic book’s history and near lack of images.)

Who You Are, Who You Are Not

From left: German-Irish White, James Laffrey. Jew, Edgar Bronfman Jr. Note the classic jew nose and sloping forehead. Sub-Saharan Black, Barack Obama Sr. Most Blacks in the USA also originate from Africa south of the Sahara desert. Each race has variety, but these three are good, basic examples. Different DNA. Different breeds. Different mentalities. / Question: Can the three men above move to Japan and become Japanese? No, and the Japanese are right in saying “No.” Non-Japanese are forever foreigners in Japan. Can the three men above move to Saudi Arabia and become Saudi Arabs? Of course not. Likewise, non-White foreigners are forever foreign to the country founded by our white Founding Fathers. The more we have mixed, the more our USA has decayed.


All people should learn about their own race. Everybody should sincerely study their race’s past and present, where they are from, what valid science has had to say about their brain’s physical features and average IQ, and what their race has and has not invented or done for their own people, their country, and our world.

With that knowledge, AMERICANS know who invented the USA and built the USA. Whites. And judging by the past and present behavior of all races, the White race is the only race who will maintain and improve such a great country as ours once was.

Blacks, as one example, have by far the lowest average IQ among the main races. In Africa, Blacks invented nothing toward a civilization before Whites shared White inventions there. But Blacks arguably can be credited for inventing some styles of music and dance. However, Blacks generally have not used music to educate and uplift but for escapism, for crying the Blues, for indiscriminate lust, and for inciting rape and murder of Whites. Meanwhile, as Americans, Blacks as a race have abused and torn down what our White-built country gave them — for example, housing. Blacks have been a huge welfare (giveaway) burden on our productive, law-abiding White race. There are exceptions. Two Black co-workers I had in Nashville were exceptions. But in general, what I have said is true and obvious in every big city.

Likewise, immigrants from the south, both legal and illegal. Mexicans, as a good example, properly called “Mestizos,” not Hispanics, have an average IQ about half-way between Blacks and Whites. The unwelcome results of their immigration include violent gang behavior, shabby living style, welfare burden, and maintenance of their foreign culture and language in conflict with our White American culture and language.

POVERTY in communities is NOT AN EXCUSE.

What did Whites in poverty do as a race? (We are speaking in general, not picking exceptions as distractions.) Whites cleaned up their neighborhoods, maintained them, and did what they could to improve them, and worked for a better future. Germans in the USA did that, despite intense oppression between World War 1 and WW2 (documentation here, continuing here.) Irish in the USA did that, despite suffering widespread prejudice during the biggest wave of Irish immigration escaping jew-British oppression including starvation.

Chinatown in New York City. A Chinese territory within our country. Whites are forced to employ others, but are Chinese forced to employ Whites? Of course not. Neither are the other minorities’ businesses — both in their home countries and here in OUR country.

In general, the non-White races use up what they have, and they have not built for a better future. Are the Chinese an exception? What does the existence of Chinatowns in big cities tell us? It tells us that Chinese work for Chinese, maintaining their foreign language and culture within our country. Furthermore, they and many other Asians send a lot of their U.S. income back to their relatives in Asia. That is not Americanization. That is invasion. Unacceptable.

This Reality Of Race does not mean that Whites should mistreat non-Whites. But the realities of Nature and history must be presented openly and then respected.

Respect for Nature and history demands the following program.

Consequences. Solutions.

Whites must overthrow JEWRY. That’s NUMBER ONE. Jewry is the Common Enemy of Whites and the other races.

  • Introduction to jewry’s historic agenda.
  • Proof that the published agenda is authentic, a book from 1938, opens as a pdf file.
  • Also see the TopLinks page on this site for a variety of historic and current truth.

We Whites cannot expect nor wait for other races in our country to help us. That is not in their histories, and it is not a potential shown by their current behaviors. Jewry has the other races blaming Whites instead of thanking Whites. (Example: the jew-owned music corporations inflicting on us the Black thug music about raping and murdering Whites. And then there’s this murderous network of Black hate against Whites.) Those races won’t change that behavior until we rid our country of jewry and educate those races about reality.

After we overthrow jewry, then we will restore our White-founded country to White majority control. We value our race, as the other races should value theirs, and we must secure our existence and a future for our children in our own country. Therefore:

  • Whites will be honestly educated to oppose interbreeding our race away. (Interbreeding, race-mixing, is the second huge mistake many previous great White societies made, such as the original Roman Empire, Portugal’s Empire, and the Whites of ancient Egypt. Their first mistake was allowing jews among them. Their second mistake was mixing themselves into browns, lowering their average IQ, and extinguishing the greatness that had built the original civilizations.)
  • Minority races will not be allowed to have children, thus bringing their residence here to a close with the current generation. Lawbreakers will be expelled immediately. Meanwhile, we will peacefully encourage and help the law-abiding minorities to return, if they choose, to the lands of their ancestors or other appropriate territory.

Why are we letting Indians (across the country) and jews (especially Las Vegas) run and monopolize casinos? It’s a scam robbing us and enriching Indians and jews while doing zero productive work.

Are American Indians a special case? No. Archaeological evidence, which the Indian tribes and the jew-media try to hush up, tells us that Whites were on this continent before the Indians’ Asian ancestors migrated to this continent — start here and here, and expand to here. While American Indian tribes lived primitive lives and occasionally conquered each other, Whites built a civilization. American Indians, in general, know and respect the fact that they have been conquered and are now a small minority in a country built by the inventive, creative, industrious, problem-solving, and generous White race.

Not generous? Oh, yes we are. We let the other races in, and now we let them discriminate against us. Why do they come here, why do they stay, why do more want to come here if we are so bad?

Yes, Whites also have faults, such as suicidal gullibility, but Whites exhibit the above-listed traits together beyond comparison with other races.

One generation of honest media operation and honest education will reverse the destruction jewry has caused among us.

The wise observer sees very clearly that jewry does everything they accuse Whites of having done. Jews accuse Whites of being the villains of the Earth when in fact jews are the villains, from Rome, to the “Civil” War, to the Russian jew-Bolshevik revolution, to the double destruction of Germany, to 9/11, and ongoing wars, Terror, joblessness, bankruptcies, and home foreclosures.

The Germanic example

Jewry, for a century already, has viciously and often openly promoted the genocide of White Germanic people by murder, starvation, and sterilization. No honest historian can disagree with that well documented fact. As usual, jewry reversed the truth by way of their illegal monopoly of the media. Only the jew race deserves their anti-human reign to end on our Earth. Therefore, we must do our part to solve the jew problem in the USA and not push our part of the problem onto other countries.

Justice for jewry

Jews have murdered so many millions of innocent people in the USA since their instigation of our “Civil” War that true justice will be impossible to obtain. However, toward the full amount of justice achievable, we vow the following. (To WordPress, please note that I am not “inciting violence” for which you would delete my website, again. I am stating that a future government should perform these remedies.)

  • Every jew who has been a part of the Federal Reserve’s creation of massive recessions and Depressions, deliberately causing bankruptcies, homelessness, starvation deaths, suicides, and other premature deaths, deserves the death penalty. This includes the “Financial Crisis” created by jewry in 2008 and continuing to this day.
  • Every jew directing and facilitating the kidnaps, trafficking, sexual abuse, and murders of our young females and males deserves the death penalty.
  • Every jew who has been a leader or otherwise high-office holder in the government of the United States or of any other governmental entity in any of the 50 states and territories of the United States deserves the death penalty.
  • Sterilization. Every jew in the USA not executed deserves to be sterilized.
  • Expel. Every jew in the USA not executed or imprisoned here will, after sterilization, be expelled.

Sound mind. Majority rule.

Nobody of sound mind thinks it wrong that the majority race in each other country can control their own country.

What kind of people do you see here? Whites. The other races never created such a country because they couldn’t. Whites demand progress, fairness, justice, and personal freedom — and make it happen. Now, we must reassert ourselves and make it happen again.

Japan for Japanese. China for Chinese. Mongolia for Mongolians. Black African countries for Black Africans. Arab countries for Arabs. Thus, we are right to say, This White country for Whites. Our country was founded by Whites as a White country. Just one long lifetime ago, our country still was very clearly a White country with very small minority populations. Jewry gained control and opened the floodgates of incompatible immigration with the deliberate goal of undermining White control. We can and we will reverse that.

Friendly countries will be treated as friends, but with no “foreign entanglements,” as Founding Father and first president George Washington correctly advised. We will help friends, as helpfulness is in our nature. Friends will need help against jewry. But we will not accept “entanglements” nor threats against our own country. Our Self-Defense must remain forever vigilant.

That is a final and longterm solution. Anything less will leave big problems unsolved to rear their ugly violent heads against future generations. We want fair and lasting peace, and this is the way. This is The American Final Solution. For Once and For All.


James T. Laffrey


Make It So.

Direct LINKS To The Top Truth

The latest page added to this WhitesWillWin! website is the TopLinks page, as of 4 November 2012.

These are direct links to the Top Truth about Race, Jews, Religion, and a couple of ideas on how to solve this jew-infestation problem in our lifetimes. (Meanwhile, please note that the Final Solution is right here.)

Now, I present excerpts from the new page of absolutely vital links, featuring the information that should be taught to us in high schools and universities but, as we know, is not. Thus, our race and our country are in catastrophic decline.


We White People Must Learn Who We Are.

William Luther Pierce, physicist turned educator and organizer for our White race.

Have you ever read history from the point of view of race rather than by country? I never had until I found William Pierce‘s great work of history titled Who We Are. Finally, I allowed myself to read and learn about the “taboo subject” of race.

  • This link opens Who We Are as one long normal webpage with no images. Originally written as a series of magazine articles, the series was later assembed into this continuous “book” form.
  • This link opens as a free pdf file with no images. It seems that the images are lost, though at least one copy confiscated by government thugs may still be in government storage.


We Must Learn Who Jews Are.

In 2008, as Barack Obama was running for president, I knew nothing of importance about jews. In other words, I was a normal, mis-educated, race-ignorant American. However, after a month in office, Obama’s utter betrayal of Americans was obvious, and I began my research to explain how such a thing could be. Now, I know. Please join me.

Some of the jews who have lied to us our whole lives through. Click to enlarge.

Since jews own all of the big media, from newspapers to tv to movie companies to big publishers and big websites, jews decide what information we receive and don’t receive about jews. …

Proof in names and photos:

  • SubvertedNation.com offers a great Lists page of jews in every vital institution of our country.
  • Another great site is Jewish Faces http://jewishfaces.com. Seeing is believing. Photos of jews by name in the government, banking, and popular media. What quicker way could there be to understand the Truth.
  • (See other links on the TopLinks page.)
  • Finally: The jews’ heinous anti-human agenda is so huge as to be impossible to keep secret. In fact, their agenda was leaked more than 100 years ago: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Of course, the elders of zion were, and are, all jews. Here is an excellent introduction to and presentation of the Protocols. Jews continue to spew lies to sow doubt about the authenticity of the Protocols. They are authentic, as the following great book explains while exposing the jews’ manipulation of an actual court trial on this very question: Jewish World Conspiracy, published in 1938 (link opens as a pdf file) by Karl Bergmeister. I consider it proof.


We Must Clear Our Heads Of Mind Poison

As Earth-shattering as the two subjects above are to most Americans, it is my duty as a White American man of honesty, intelligence, and integrity, to share my hard-earned, heartfelt wisdom.

Thomas Jefferson, Aug. 10, 1787:

Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear.

I realize that most Americans are not able to take this third step with me. That is ok. Leaders are who I seek to develop and/or attract. The strongest minds among us can and will take this third step after seeing the evidence.

Thomas Jefferson, Dec. 6, 1813:

History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.

Our Founding Fathers were the best of the Whites who created our country, and Thomas Jefferson was (arguably) the best of them. Normally, the White way is to revere the best and to build on the shoulders of the best, always seeking improvement.

Thomas Jefferson, April 13, 1820:

Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him [Jesus] by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence; and others again of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism, and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being.

Why, then, 200 years later, are most White Americans still sucking the teat of religion instead of standing on the shoulders of Jefferson and the other greats of our race?

Revilo P. Oliver, professor, scholar of history, racial realist

Short articles on the history of religion(s) abound in the Liberty Bell magazine, most written by the great scholar Revilo P. Oliver, professor at the University of Illinois for three decades. Newcomers to Oliver’s writings may mistake his sarcasm for praise or agreement with jew lies, but veterans will nod and smile in appreciation. Here is a long list of selected articles for perusal by title.

  • Liberty Bell magazine archive here (all files are pdf files), but issues are listed by month and year of publication with no subject info. I suggest starting here for an Oliver article touching on Norse mythology. For Christian/Jew history, start here Jan. 1983, or here May 1987.
  • By Their Fruits Ye Shall Know Them.” This article is part of an archive at a different website. Oliver exposes what really happened with the Dead Sea Scrolls and what the one scroll allowed into an honest researcher’s hands revealed. As usual, Oliver spices the article with his sarcastic wit against the one enemy race.
  • Making a Home Run, part 1.” Oliver reveals the history of jew Popes in the Vatican, and as always, offers extra history, and spices the article with his irreverent and sarcastic vocabulary of terms referring to the enemy race.
  • Nicholas Carter offers a long article on jew and biblical history in the Liberty Bell magazine of June 1989.


Alfred Crozier, in 1912, wrote the most important book about U.S. money ever.

Alfred Owen Crozier, one of the greatest Americans jewry wants kept down the memory hole.

100 years ago, the true patriot American named Alfred Owen Crozier published his historic book on our money system and absolutely correctly predicted, in detail, the ensuing recessions, depressions, bankruptcies, homelessness, and who would benefit from all the misery. Crozier’s historic work is titled U.S. Money VS. Corporate Currency. Do not let the dry title cause a moment of hesitation. It is a total expose, and that is why you almost certainly never heard of it before. Thanks to the White invention of the Internet, we can share this essential American book freely and almost instantly.

Here is a direct link to a free pdf file of the book. Please read it, or at least skim it. It is that important.


That’s a sample. Enjoy the entire list, and add your nominations for other vital links, by visiting the TopLinks page now.


James T. Laffrey


Make It So.