Update, 1 July 2016: notes on Charles Lindbergh’s speeches


Yes, indeed, 1939.

The impetus for this article is another Consumer Reports magazine, another stroll through history, and another nugget begging comment. (Why “another”? See my recent “Food” article.)

It’s the July 2016 issue of Consumer Reports, page 54. The jew editors of the magazine from that jew organization are praising themselves for selected past articles, and they offer this nugget:

September 1939

Taking a stand. Following a National Health Conference, which revealed that one-third of Americans lacked healthcare or access to treatment, we made a pitch for universal coverage. “In a democracy, the welfare of every individual counts, and every life is valuable. If we are unable to overcome poverty, unable to provide a job for every man and woman willing to work and to guarantee a decent standard of living to everybody, we are collectively responsible for such a condition.”

My comments

* First and foremost, what is that statement a reaction to? It’s a direct response to the pressure put on the U.S. government by the great government of White Germany. (Important note: the U.S. government was, and is, jew-infested. To name just one of the many: Pres. Franklin Roosevelt was a secret jew.) Led by Adolf Hitler, Germany’s government was famously providing all of those benefits: they overcame poverty for all Whites, provided a job for every man and woman willing to work, and guaranteed a better-than-decent standard of living to all Germans — especially families.

olympics-poster.1936I say “famously” because the Summer Olympics of 1936 had been held in Berlin, Germany, and had shown visitors from all over the world what wonderful prosperity was being enjoyed by Germans during that decade. Naturally, many Americans (Whites, of course) were asking why the USA was still mired in the Great Depression (since 1929) while Germany had rocketed out of that Depression after Mr. Hitler rose to full leadership in 1933 — the same year FDR started his 4-term reign in the White House.

How did Germany do it? First and foremost, by removing jews and their theft-by-banking agenda from the country’s money system. Another reason, by celebrating and generously rewarding productive work.

* Secondly, look at what’s wrong with the wording of that magazine quote.

– It says “democracy,” but the USA was established as a republic not a democracy. Our White Founding Fathers knew what democracy was and didn’t want one. In fact, a democracy larger than a small community is impossible (because if you’re voting for someone you don’t personally know well, the “democracy” is a farce).

olympic-stadium.aerial.1936– And what about “every individual counts” and “every life is valuable“? Lies. The jews count only jews as valuable while referring to the rest of humanity as “cattle.” Read parts of their Talmud, their racial rulebook, to quickly learn that. As for us, we should know that Whites are most valuable, and we should know that born-retards (as one example) are not valuable at all but in fact are simple mutant refuse and burdens that ought be eliminated as soon as they are recognized as such. And we should know that nonWhites should not be allowed residency in our country, where they cause far more ills than any “enhancements” they supposedly provide.

Mr. Adolf Hitler and German female athletes enjoy a photo opportunity.

Mr. Adolf Hitler and German female athletes enjoy a photo opportunity.

– Finally, we are “collectively responsible” for any shortcomings of the government and society. Absurd. But that’s how the jews deftly get ignorant Whites (and I was an ignorant White, too, just a decade ago) to unconsciously incorporate a sense of guilt into our subconscious and/or consciousness. Most Whites didn’t, and still don’t, realize that jews pretending to be Whites infest the government and all other major institutions in our country and are responsible for all shortcomings.

On our way from the 1936 Olympics up to 1939

In May 1937, the famous German dirigible (zeppelin, blimp) The Hindenburg erupted in flames upon arrival in New Jersey. The cause: jew sabotage. At the Olympics in Berlin, everyone had seen examples of the safe and reliable German dirigibles. The airships had become an international symbol of Germany and the country’s economic and technological successes thanks to removal of the jews from banking and other vital institutions.



1936 Olympics medals count

1939, what else was going on?

Japan and China were two or three years into war already.

In January, Adolf Hitler gave a major speech in which he said jew financiers were trying to force the start of war in Europe. He hoped public knowledge of that fact would help avoid war.

An image of the actual front page of this newspaper, March 1933.

An image of the actual front page of this newspaper, March 1933.

In July 1939, the German government closed what were, supposedly, the final remaining jew-owned businesses in Germany. (See? The jews had declared war on Germany back in 1933, and Adolf Hitler had come to full power in 1933, yet there were still in 1939 jew businesses allowed to operate — so very lenient!) The problem, of course, was that they were not the final jew-owned businesses in Germany. Mr. Hitler and his fellow top leaders seem to have been unaware of the secret jews, what we call “crypto-jews,” pretending to be Whites and still infesting the country as an anti-German network of info and sabotage.

In September 1939, the Consumer Reports September issue had already been published and distributed. Poland had flatly snubbed Germany’s generous peace proposals while instigating widespread murderous terror attacks on Germans in Poland. So, Adolf Hitler decided to return Poland to German control where Poland was before WW1. This is what the jews call the official beginning of WW2. But the jews never tell us that they, themselves, had declared war on Germany and all Germans worldwide in 1933, thus forcing Germany into self defense throughout the period.

Furthermore, Poland was manipulated by the USA and England (both led by secret jews, FDR and Winston Churchill) to give Germany no peaceful option and thereby ignite the shooting war that the jews had so evilly contrived. FDR and Churchill had told the Polish government that the Brits would directly defend them against any advance by Germany — and then they didn’t defend Poland at all, right according to plan.

Charles Lindbergh Jr.

Charles Lindbergh Jr.

In October 1939, Charles Lindbergh Jr., the famous aviator and son of a great Congressman, gave the first of a series of especially notable speeches urging Americans to prevent the government from involving the USA in the war in Europe.

Two years later, on Sept. 11, 1941 (a “9-11″), Lindbergh showed that he had learned a lot, but not enough, in delivering perhaps his best speech. “The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish, and the Roosevelt administration,” he said. He still didn’t know enough to say that all three of those groups were the same group: jews. This fact is obvious to any knowledgeable person who reads the full, flawed, yet important speech. Three months later, FDR’s secret acts of war against Japan finally lured the only admirable slice of the Mongoloid race to attack Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, thus giving the jews the excuse to throw U.S. might into the war against White Germany. (And then Lindbergh, still woefully ignorant, put his talents to work helping the jews murder our cousin Germans.)

Post WW2

That Consumer Reports history page also includes an item from their June 1946 issue, which was a year after the end of WW2.

The item exposed two blatant lies in claims the Bayer company made in an advertisement in a popular U.S. publication. Of course, what the jew Consumer Reports magazine does not say is the Bayer company was a German company until the end of WW2, at which time, since the jews won WW2, the jews took control of every German company, bank, and of course, the government. So, the Bayer lies were by jews.


The media from which most Americans get their opinion-forming information like to isolate events in history, which makes it easier for them to lead Americans to wrongful conclusions.

I like to provide context, by both simultaneous events and previous events. Thus, readers are more likely to arrive at the truth of what happened — in this case, for the pivotal year of 1939. And then, that truth can be applied to what’s happening now.

That’s what we need to change: the now! And by changing the now, we change the future, too.

Join us, White MEN and women. Help us make history right now. See “the best” advice and other articles linked at the bottom of this website.

Whites must, Whites will, win.

8 thoughts on “1939?

  1. I don’t mind telling you I get excited with hope and inspiration every time I see each of your latest articles that are so new and so right.

    In support of your article here is a recent Tomato Bubble article on the same era and a couple of speeches by Adolf Hitler about his decisions in regard to the Soviet Union and other aspects of the war and international relations.

    Off the top, it says:
    • Stalin violated the Soviet-Polish Non-Aggression Pact by invading Poland in 1939
    • Stalin violated the Soviet-Finnish Non-Aggression Pact by invading Finland in 1939

    • Hitler believed that Stalin, in secret collaboration with the British, was planning to totally break the Soviet-German Non Aggression Pact by launching a massive surprise attack upon anti-Communist Germany.

    Here’s the link to that article:

    I strongly recommend reading it (and enjoying the images) to see some of what Adolf Hitler actually said rather than what the Sheenie media and Kikelywood say he said.

    • Thank you!

      Also quoting from that article and the 1941 speech by Adolf Hitler:

      “The German people have never had hostile feelings toward the peoples of Russia. During the last two decades, however, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have attempted to set not only Germany, but all of Europe, aflame. Germany has never attempted to spread its National Socialist world-view to Russia. Rather, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have constantly attempted to subject us and the other European peoples to their rule. They have attempted this not only intellectually, but above all through military means.

      The results of their efforts, in every nation, were only chaos, misery, and starvation.

      I, on the other hand, have tried for two decades to build a new socialist order in Germany, with a minimum of interference and without harming our productive capacity. This has not only eliminated unemployment, but also the profits of labor have flowed increasingly to working people.

      The results of our policies are unique in all the world. Our economic and social reorganization has led to the systematic elimination of social and class barriers, with the goal of a true people’s community.”

      I agree that it is well worth all doubters’ time to take a good look at that article.

      Two cautionary notes:
      1. Tomato Bubble is a very good site but with flaws. Mike King, the site owner and main writer, is pro-Putin and anti-evolution, to name two top problems. But overall, it’s a very helpful site, which is why it has long been listed on the TruthfulSites pages here.

      2. Adolf Hitler used the term “socialist” because it was such a popular term in his era, similar to how popular “democracy” has been in this country during the last 100 years. As we know, socialism was a jew creation right along with the jew communism and the jew capitalism, all birthed in the 1800s. All of those jew creations offered only lies to the people, whereas Adolf Hitler’s version of “socialist” was German “National Socialist” as part of the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP), and as he said above, honestly had “the goal of a true people’s community” for the whole country.

      Final note: It’s easy to see which leader(s) told the truth back then and which were liars — namely Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, Joseph Stalin, and more. All we have to do is read a few texts of speeches or to listen to the actual recordings, easily available on video sites. But most people still seem too lazy to do it, or is it they are afraid — afraid to have their entire worldview turned upside-down?!

      Again, danke schon!

      • Let’s go further in bursting the tomato Bubble.

        King, selling himself with a cat, is pro-God capital “G.”

        King is pro-DonaldTrump, the CryptoKike international hotelier and tv star now misleading the rightfully angry but sadly stupid masses into the electoral toilet.

        James, keep up the great work, the best work on the internet.

  2. What is even more interesting is that Hitler took a country utterly prostrated by Jews, a country that had had its critical resources eviscerated from its territory, a country whose people had become morally bankrupted, a country that had its treasury bled of all its gold to pay the grossly unfair reparation tax called the Versailles treaty, and led it to greater success than all the other countries suffering from the so called “great depression”. Essentially, Hitler took a country at the very bottom of the economic scale and raised it to the number one position on the globe just a few years after being decimated by Jewish bankers.

    “– It says “democracy,” but the USA was established as a republic not a democracy. Our White Founding Fathers knew what democracy was and didn’t want one. In fact, a democracy larger than a small community is impossible (because if you’re voting for someone you don’t personally know well, the “democracy” is a farce”

    A true democracy cannot work much beyond the level of a colony the size of any one of the original thirteen. That was the primary reason for the size of the original colony: to include only the people that had a vested interest in the regional issues at stake. The idea behind the American colony was that the individuals living in that region, and thus the representative, had the same vested interest in the affairs of the colony as the other people living within its regional confines. Note that the much larger land area states did not come about until after the end of the north’s war of aggression. After that, states grew larger with each inclusion to the union.

    Democracy is a system where the people vote on critical issues as opposed to an elected representative. Perhaps the most interesting idea about the Greek democracy was how at the end of the year, a vote was taken to find the most disliked person who would then be banished from the state. The American republic/representative system was brought forth because of the technical limitations of the day. In the agrarian society of early America, farmers could ill afford the time to travel to a central location to vote, nor could a personal vote be effectively collected and delivered securely. Had the founders had the benefit of our current technology, no doubt the political system would be far different today.

    Many years ago, I wrote a lengthy proposal for an Electronic Voting System (EVS) to be implemented by the individual states. It was a system that was intended to bring about a true democracy. The basic idea was to eliminate the representative system of government where people vote largely on their preference for a broad grin or pretty hairdo and replace it with a vote on the issues. The way state referendums are treated by the representative form of government proves that voting on issues does not work if overriding political power can veto the vote.

    Voters would be required to demonstrate some form of vested interest in their citizenship, e.g. property ownership, business, etc.. Issues would be vetted initially as to their relevance. For instance, would people be interested enough in the issue of transgender toilets to put it to a vote, would such an issue even be worthy of a vote? After the successful vetting of an issue, it would be televised from 30 to 60 days with both sides, pro and con, having their say. After that period of examination, a voter would have one to two weeks to cast their vote at any time over a secure cable connection to their television. (This was written over thirty years ago). A friend of mine commented on a novel idea he had to achieve similar results. His idea was to issue everyone a red and green flashlight and on a given night, everyone would go outside and signal their vote by flashing the light into the sky where the results would be picked up by satellite. In retrospect, I think his simple idea had more merit than my far more complex EVS system.

    What is most interesting is that when I presented my idea to various people, virtually no one liked the idea. I would say, “So you won’t even give a new political approach a chance? You prefer to stay with the present corrupt political system despite what it has done to the country? So how’s that been working out so far? The number one response I heard repeatedly was: “A democratic vote? Why that would be mob rule! People are too stupid to be allowed to vote on issues!” Of course, the individuals saying this did not count themselves as being among the “too stupid”. For some reason, these people seemed to forget that America is already supposed to be a democracy.

    I have long maintained that Germany’s National Socialist system would have ultimately failed at some point as all highly centralized governments do. While Hitler was truly a benevolent dictator who loved his people and held their best interest at heart, how many other leaders of this caliber are evident in history? The fact is, such examples of leadership are exceptionally rare. It would not have taken too many dictators after Hitler before Jews would have again wormed their way into the system to once again begin eating out the system from within, either as “advisors” to the dictator, or with offers of dazzling financial offers to enhance his personal wealth. One of the fundamental principals of Judaism is that “every man has his price” and while ultimately untrue, it is far too often the norm.

    I like your website and was especially intrigued by your piece on the Philadelphia convention. That piece greatly clarified what has long been a purposefully muddied account of the beginnings of the American government.

  3. In Adolf Hitler’s preface to his book, written in prison, he wrote:

    “I know that fewer people are won over by the written, than by the spoken,
    word and that every great movement on this earth owes its growth to great
    speakers and not to great writers.

    “Nevertheless, in order to achieve more equality and uniformity in the
    defence of any doctrine, its fundamental principles must be committed to
    writing. May these two volumes therefore serve as building stones which I
    contribute to the common task.”

    My question is: Do you plan to speak?

    • Excellent quote, there.

      I can’t say I “plan” to speak, at this time, but I always “hope” to speak. A few years ago, I began speaking the YouTube way, but I quit that after the first video mostly because YouTube’s jews simply delete any video that says the full truth.

      In regard to public in-person speaking, that’s where my “hope” to speak remains. Various considerations keep me from it, thus far.

      However, if I were invited by a White person or group, and if expenses were paid and security provided, I would certainly accept.

Comments are closed.